COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2 NEW DELHI vs. M/S HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD. A.Y. 2012-13
What did the High Court hold?
The Delhi High Court held that the appeals filed by the Revenue were rendered infructuous. This was because the ITAT, by its order dated October 29, 2021, had recalled its earlier order dated December 9, 2020, specifically concerning Grounds 6 and 7, which were the primary basis for the Revenue's appeals. The Court disposed of the present appeals and applications as infructuous. It clarified that if the appellant (Revenue) wished to challenge the liability to deposit advance tax and interest thereon, it was at liberty to file separate appeals. The ratio decidendi is that an appeal challenging an order becomes infructuous if the order itself is subsequently recalled by the original adjudicating authority on the very grounds under challenge.
What were the facts?
The Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) 2, New Delhi (Revenue) filed several Income Tax Appeals (ITAs) before the Delhi High Court against orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). These appeals, filed in June 2022, challenged ITAT orders dated December 9, 2020, primarily concerning Grounds 6 and 7. The assessment years involved span from 2010-11 to 2016-17. The Revenue's counsel presented a photocopy of a subsequent ITAT order dated October 29, 2021, which recalled its earlier order concerning Grounds 6 and 7, pursuant to an application filed under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The respondent in these appeals is Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. (Assessee).
What were the issues?
The primary issue before the Delhi High Court was the impact of the ITAT's subsequent order recalling its earlier decision on Grounds 6 and 7. The Revenue argued, through its counsel, that the ITAT had recalled its order on the specific grounds that formed the basis of the present appeals. The Assessee's counsel was also present. The Court had to decide whether the appeals filed against the initial ITAT order were rendered infructuous by the subsequent recall order. The core of the dispute revolved around the finality of the ITAT's decision on Grounds 6 and 7, which were the subject of the Revenue's appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
$~27-33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 255/2022 & C.M.No.34237/2022 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2 NEW DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Kunal Sharma, Sr.Standing Counsel for the Revenue with Ms.Zehra Khan and Mr.Shray Nargotra, Advocates. versus HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD. A.Y. 2015-16 ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kavita Jha with Mr.Udit Naresh, Advocates. 28 + ITA 256/2022 & C.M.No.34238/2022 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2 NEW DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Kunal Sharma, Sr.Standing Counsel for the Revenue with Ms.Zehra Khan and Mr.Shray Nargotra, Advocates. versus M/S HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD. A.Y. 2012-13 ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kavita Jha with Mr.Udit Naresh, Advocates. 29 + ITA 257/2022 & C.M.No.34239/2022 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2 NEW DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr Mr.Kunal Sharma, Sr.Standing This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2026 at 01:48:42
Counsel for the Revenue with Ms.Zehra Khan and Mr.Shray Nargotra, Advocates. versus HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD. A.Y. 2016-17 ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kavita Jha with Mr.Udit Naresh, Advocates. 30 + ITA 258/2022 & C.M.No.34240/2022 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2 NEW DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Kunal Sharma, Sr.Standing Counsel for the Revenue with Ms.Zehra Khan and Mr.Shray Nargotra, Advocates. versus HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD. A.Y. 2014-15 ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kavita Jha with Mr.Udit Naresh, Advocates. 31 + ITA 259/2022 & C.M.No.34241/2022 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2 NEW DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Kunal Sharma, Sr.Standing Counsel for the Revenue with Ms.Zehra Khan and Mr.Shray Nargotra, Advocates. versus This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2026 at 01:48:42
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD. A.Y. 2013-14 ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kavita Jha with Mr.Udit Naresh, Advocates. 32 + ITA 260/2022 & C.M.No.34242/2022 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2 NEW DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Kunal Sharma, Sr.Standing Counsel for the Revenue with Ms.Zehra Khan and Mr.Shray Nargotra, Advocates. versus M/S HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD. A.Y. 2011-12 ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kavita Jha with Mr.Udit Naresh, Advocates. 33 + ITA 261/2022 & C.M.No.34243/2022 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2 NEW DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Kunal Sharma, Sr.Standing Counsel for the Revenue with Ms.Zehra Khan and Mr.Shray Nargotra, Advocates. versus HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD. A.Y. 2010-11 ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kavita Jha with Mr.Udit Naresh, Advocates. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2026 at 01:48:42
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R % 04.08.2022 Present Income Tax Appeals have been filed challenging the common Order dated 09th December, 2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 6921/Del/2014, ITA No. 937/Del./2014, ITA No. 6376/Del./2016, ITA No. 6377/Del./2016, ITA No. 6799 /Del./2017, ITA No. 5506/Del./2018 and ITA No. 8263/Del./2019. Today, learned counsel for the Appellant has handed over in Court, a photocopy of the order dated 29th October, 2021 passed by the ITAT recalling its order vis-a-vis Grounds 6 and 7 in an application filed under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It is pertinent to mention that the present appeals filed on 16th June, 2022 challenge the initial order of the ITAT dated 09th December, 2020 primarily with regard to Grounds 6 and 7. Consequently, this Court disposes of the present appeals and applications as infructuous. It is clarified that if the appellant so desires, it is at liberty to file separate appeals challenging the liability to deposit advance tax and interest thereon. MANMOHAN, J MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J AUGUST 4, 2022 KA This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2026 at 01:48:42
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Anjanarani Jena vs. The Commissioner,CGST, Cx And CustomsOrissa · 10 Nov 2026
- M/S Alok Kumar Sethi, Bhubaneswar vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 10 Nov 2026
- Natuk Mra vs. The Union Of INDIA And 3 OrsGauhati · 10 Nov 2026
- Tatvam Procon Private Limited, Gujarat vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 10 Nov 2026
- Swapna Acharya vs. Superintendent, GST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar-1Orissa · 10 Nov 2026
