KRBL LIMITED vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 13(1), DELHI AND ORS
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court, while acknowledging the revenue's intention to file an appeal against the ITAT order, noted that sufficient time had passed and that, as per law, an appeal effect order should be passed within three months of the appeal order. Considering the limited prayer in the writ petition, the Court disposed of the petition with a direction to the respondents-Revenue to consider the issuance of the refund of Rs. 35,63,56,882/- along with interest, passing an appeal effect order pursuant to the ITAT order dated May 9, 2022, and issuing the additional refund of Rs. 20,36,43,118/- along with interest. The necessary appeal effect order and refund payments were to be made within six weeks. The rights and contentions of all parties were left open.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, KRBL Limited, filed a writ petition seeking directions for the issuance of refunds and interest due. The petitioner claimed an admitted refund of Rs. 35,63,56,882/- pursuant to an appeal effect order dated April 5, 2021, arising from a CIT(A) order. Additionally, they sought an additional refund of Rs. 20,36,43,118/- along with interest, and the release of Rs. 60,00,000/- seized during a search, both pursuant to an ITAT order dated May 9, 2022. The petitioner had made representations to the respondents on May 20, 2022, and July 11, 2022, for the appeal effect order and refund release, but without success. The revenue stated they were in the process of filing an appeal against the ITAT order.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the respondents-Revenue should be directed to issue the refund of Rs. 35,63,56,882/- along with up-to-date interest, being due pursuant to the appeal effect order dated April 5, 2021, arising from the CIT(A) order. The petitioner argued that this refund is admittedly due. 2. Whether the respondents-Revenue should be directed to pass an appeal effect order pursuant to the ITAT order dated May 9, 2022, and issue an additional refund of Rs. 20,36,43,118/- along with up-to-date interest. The petitioner contended that the ITAT decided all issues in their favour, leading to the deletion of all additions and entitlement to a refund of taxes paid under protest amounting to Rs. 56,00,00,000/- along with interest under Sections 244A/244A(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. They also argued that non-issuance of refund violates Article 265 of the Constitution of India and Sections 237 and 240 of the Act. The revenue stated they were in the process of filing an appeal against the ITAT order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Neutral Citation Number: 2022/DHC/004599 W.P.(C) 15067/2022 Page 1 of 3 $~96 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 15067/2022 KRBL LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through : Ms. Ananya Kapoor with Mr.Sumit Lalchandani, Advocates. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 13(1), DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue along with Mr.A.Renganath, Advocate. % Date of Decision: 01st November, 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA J U D G M E N T MANMOHAN, J (ORAL): CM APPL. 46552/2022 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 15067/2022 1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondents to issue the refund of Rs.35,63,56,882/- along with up-to-date interest being admittedly due to the Petitioner pursuant to appeal effect order dated 05th April, 2021 arising out of order of CIT(A), pass the appeal effect Digitally Signed By:JASWANT SINGH RAWAT Signing Date:02.11.2022 18:31:18 Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number: 2022/DHC/004599 W.P.(C) 15067/2022 Page 2 of 3 order pursuant to the ITAT order dated 09th May, 2022 as well as issue additional refund of Rs. 20,36,43,118/- along with up-to-date interest and to release the refund of Rs.60,00,000/- seized at the time of search along with up-to-date interest due to the Petitioner pursuant to the ITAT order dated 09th May, 2022. 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the ITAT vide order dated 09th May, 2022, decided all issues in favour of the Petitioner and the entire additions were deleted. She states that the Petitioner is now entitled to a refund of remaining taxes paid under protest amounting to Rs.56,00,00,000/- along with applicable interest under Sections 244A/244A(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’). 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner has filed letters dated 20th May, 2022 and 11th July, 2022 with the Respondents for passing of an appeal effect order pursuant to the ITAT order and also for release of refunds legally due to the Petitioner, but to no avail. She submits that non-issuance of refund is in violation of Article 265 of the Constitution of India and also against Sections 237 and 240 of the Act. 4. Issue notice. Mr.Ajit Sharma, learned senior standing counsel accepts notice on behalf of the Respondents-Revenue. He states that the Revenue is in the process of filing an appeal against the order of the ITAT. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that the Respondents-Revenue has had sufficient time to file an appeal against the order of the ITAT. In any event, in accordance with the mandate of law, the appeal effect order has to be passed within three months of passing the appeal order. Digitally Signed By:JASWANT SINGH RAWAT Signing Date:02.11.2022 18:31:18 Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number: 2022/DHC/004599 W.P.(C) 15067/2022 Page 3 of 3 6. Keeping in view the limited prayer sought in the present writ petition, the same is disposed of along with the pending application with a direction to the Respondents-Revenue to consider:- (i) Issue of refund of Rs.35,63,56,882/- along with up-to-date interest being due to the Petitioner pursuant to appeal effect order dated 05th April, 2021 arising out of order of CIT(A); (ii) Passing an appeal effect order pursuant to ITAT order dated 09th May, 2022; and (iii) Issue of additional refund of Rs.20,36,43,118/- along with up-to-date interest. 7. The necessary appeal effect order and payments of refunds shall be made within a period of six weeks. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open. MANMOHAN, J MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J NOVEMBER 01, 2022 KA Digitally Signed By:JASWANT SINGH RAWAT Signing Date:02.11.2022 18:31:18 Signature Not Verified
More judgments on Section 244A
- Shailesh Khodabhai Ramani, Rajkot vs ITO, Ward-2(1)(3), RajkotITA 366/RJT/2024[2012-13]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Shailesh Khodabhai Ramani, Rajkot vs ITO, Ward-2(1)(5), RajkotITA 257/RJT/2024[2011-12]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 3453/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6805/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Pratibha Sanjai Srivastava, Ahmedabad vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2)(1), AhmedabadITA 2565/AHD/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2021-2022
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Anjanarani Jena vs. The Commissioner,CGST, Cx And CustomsOrissa · 10 Nov 2026
- M/S Alok Kumar Sethi, Bhubaneswar vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 10 Nov 2026
- Natuk Mra vs. The Union Of INDIA And 3 OrsGauhati · 10 Nov 2026
- Tatvam Procon Private Limited, Gujarat vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 10 Nov 2026
- Swapna Acharya vs. Superintendent, GST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar-1Orissa · 10 Nov 2026