SHRI THOUFEEK AHAMED vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

PDF · subscribers
WP(C)/34621/2014HC KeralaKLHC01080239201419 December 2014Author: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON4 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court did not decide the merits of any substantive issue related to the Income Tax Act. Instead, the judgment states that the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn. This implies that the petitioner chose not to press the petition before the court. Therefore, no finding was made on any specific tax-related question, and no operative directions were issued regarding the tax assessment or appeal. The court did not leave any issue undecided as the matter was withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The petitioner, Shri Thoufeek Ahamed, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala challenging an order. The respondents are the Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3), the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), and another Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3). The specific order or action under challenge and the assessment year(s) are not explicitly stated in the provided text. The procedural history indicates that the writ petition (civil) was filed and came up for admission on December 19, 2014. The judgment does not mention any amount in dispute.

What were the issues?

The primary issue before the High Court was whether the petitioner was entitled to any relief under its writ jurisdiction. The petitioner's contentions are not detailed in the provided text. The revenue's arguments are also not recorded. The judgment does not frame specific questions of law or mixed law and fact, nor does it name any specific provisions of the Income Tax Act that were central to the arguments.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (2 matters)

WP(C).No. 34621 of 2014
TC 30/11

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2014/28TH AGRAHAYANA, 1936 WP(C).No. 34621 of 2014 (C) ---------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------- SHRI THOUFEEK AHAMED AGED 35 YEARS TC 30/1120, AMBALAMUKH, PETTA PO TOLL JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 023. BY ADV. SRI.M.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ---------------- 1. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(3), 2ND FLOOR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN KAUDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 023. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS) OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOUDIYAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 023. 3. SHRI.T.G.JAISON LAL INC0ME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), 2ND FLOOR AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOUDIYAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 023. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19- 12-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 34621 of 2014 (C) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 11/7/2014 PASSED BY THE IST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF FORM OF APPEAL & GROUNDS OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION DATED 6/8/2014 FILED BY THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT P3A COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD IN RESPECT OF EXHIBIT P2 & P3 EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 2/12/2014 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P5 COPY OF REPLY DATED 9/12/2014 SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE IST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P6 COPY OF POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 10/12/2014 IN RESPECT OF EXHIBIT P5 /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE SJ

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No.34621 of 2014 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 19 th day of December, 2014 JUDGMENT As against Ext.P1 assessment order passed by the 1st respondent, the petitioner submitted Ext.P2 appeal along with Ext.P3 petition for stay, which is pending consideration before the 2nd respondent. 2. In response to Ext.P4 show cause notice issued by the 1st respondent proposing to impose penalty, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P5 reply. In spite of the fact that petitioner has turned up before the 1st respondent seeking to explain the facts and figures, he was never entertained and this made the petitioner to approach this Court by filing the writ petition. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 4. After hearing both the sides, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P3 petition for stay, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within 'one month' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

W.P.(C) No.34621 of 2014

Coercive proceedings, if any, shall be kept in abeyance till such time. With regard to the proposal for imposing penalty, Ext.P5 reply submitted by the petitioner in response to Ext.P4 shall be considered, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. It shall be done within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the concerned authority for further steps. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →