THE CHIRAKKAL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. vs. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

PDF · subscribers
WP(C)/180/2015HC KeralaKLHC01046020201506 January 2015Author: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR4 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The provided text does not contain the High Court's decision on any issues, the reasoning behind its findings, or the ratio decidendi. Consequently, there are no operative directions issued by the court, nor are there any issues expressly left undecided. The judgment excerpt is insufficient to determine what the Tribunal held.

What were the facts?

The petitioner, The Chirakkal Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., represented by its Secretary, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala. The respondents are the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), the Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Kannur, and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Kozhikode. The writ petition challenges an order or action by one of the respondents, though the specific order and assessment year(s) are not detailed in the provided text. The procedural history leading to this writ petition is also not elaborated upon in the excerpt.

What were the issues?

The provided text does not contain the specific issues that the High Court had to decide, nor does it detail the arguments presented by the petitioner or the respondents. Therefore, it is not possible to frame the questions of law or mixed law and fact, or to outline the contentions of each side, including any authorities, circulars, or precedents relied upon. The judgment excerpt is silent on these aspects.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/16TH POUSHA, 19361 WP(C).No.180 of 2015 (V) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- THE CHIRAKKAL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. P.O.CHIRAKKAL KANNUR - KANNUR - 670011, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY CHANDRAN P. BY ADVS.DR.K.P.PRADEEP SRI.I.V.PRAMOD RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE,GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK,NEW DELHI - 110001, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 2. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 1,KANNUR, AAYAKKAR BHAVAN,KANNOTHUMCHAL, CHOVVA,KANNUR - 670006. 3. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), KOZHIKODE,AAYAKAR BHAVAN,REVENUE BUILDING, MANANCHIRA,KOZHIKODE - 673 008. R1 TO R3 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: pk

WP(C).No.180 of 2015 (V) ----------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ------------------------------------ EXT.P-1:TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE NO.8671/2011/O DATED 16.12.2011 ISSUED BY THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KANNUR TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P-2:TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.AAAACO458M DATED 28.11.2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012 - 13. EXT.P-3:TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 13.12.2014 FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2012 - 13 AGAINST EXT.P2 ASSESSMENT ORDER. EXT.P-4:TRUE COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION DATED 23.12.2014 IN EXT.P3 APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P-5:TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE IN PAN AAAACO458M DATED 28.11.2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE pk

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.180 OF 2015 (V) ----------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of January, 2015 J U D G M E N T Against Ext.P2 assessment order, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P3 appeal and Ext.P4 stay petition before the 3rd respondent Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). It is the case of the petitioner that even prior to considering the stay petition, recovery steps are sought to be pursued for recovery of the amounts confirmed by Ext.P2 assessment order. 2. Heard Sri.K.P.Pradeep, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.Jose Joseph, learned Standing counsel for the respondents. 3. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petition with the following directions: 1. The 3rd respondent shall consider and pass orders on the stay petition within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after

W.P.(C).No.180/2015

hearing the petitioner. 2.Recovery steps for recovery of amounts confirmed against petitioner by the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance till orders are passed by the 3rd respondent as directed above and communicated to the petitioner. 3. The order to be passed by the 3rd respondent shall be a reasoned one adverting to the contentions of the petitioner regarding existence of a prima facie case for a stay of recovery pending disposal of the appeal. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE prp

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →