BHARPUR DASS vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
What did the High Court hold?
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petitions on the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents. Mr. Chawla, appearing for the respondents, stated on instructions that the refunds, as determined in the order under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated November 21, 2023, would be released within a period of three weeks from the date of the order (July 29, 2024). The Court recorded and accepted this statement. Consequently, no further adjudication on the merits of the refund determination was undertaken by the High Court. The operative direction was for the release of refunds within the stipulated timeframe.
What were the facts?
The petitioners, Bharpur Dass and Shubh Dass, filed writ petitions before the Delhi High Court. The petitions challenged an order passed under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated November 21, 2023. The respondents, the Commissioner of Income Tax and another authority, were represented by their counsel. The core of the dispute, though not explicitly detailed, appears to relate to the release of refunds determined by the Section 154 order. The procedural history indicates that the matter reached the High Court via writ petitions.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the respondents are obligated to release the refunds as determined by the order under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated November 21, 2023. The assessee (petitioners) sought a direction for the release of refunds. The revenue (respondents) contended that the refunds would be released as determined by the Section 154 order. The revenue, through its counsel Mr. Chawla, made a specific statement regarding the timeline for releasing the refunds.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
$~148 & 149 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10331/2024
BHARPUR DASS
.....Petitioner
Through: Appearance not given.
versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Aseem Chawla, SSC along with Ms. Pratishtha Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Jain, Sr. Panel Counsel with Mr.Manish Singh and Ms.Tarjana, Advocates for R-2 149 + W.P.(C) 10332/2024
SHUBH DASS
.....Petitioner
Through: Appearance not given.
versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Aseem Chawla, SSC along with Ms. Pratishtha Chaudhary, Adv.
Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, SPC and Ms. Kalpana Jha, Adv. for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
O R D E R %
29.07.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 22:45:32
CM APPL. 42322/2024 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 10331/2024 CM APPL. 42324/2024 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 10332/2024
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 10331/2024 & W.P.(C) 10332/2024
Mr. Chawla, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, on instructions states that in terms of the order under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [„Act‟] dated 21 November 2023, the refunds as determined shall be duly released within a period of three weeks from today. The statement so made is recorded and accepted.
The writ petitions stand disposed of on the above terms.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J. JULY 29, 2024/RW This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 22:45:32
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sampat Raj Jain vs. The State Of Assam And 3 Ors.Gauhati · 3 Nov 2026
- Sri Hardik Gowda vs. Sri Jayaram PKarnataka · 3 Nov 2026
- Shiv Ram vs. State Of Hp And OrsHimachal Pradesh · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Ampl Resources PVT. LTD., Through Sri Om Prakash Pareek, Authorised Signatory vs. The State Of JharkhandJharkhand · 3 Nov 2026
- Saleem vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 3 Nov 2026