MEERA SINGH vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed all the Writ Petitions. It declared Explanations A(a)(ii)/A(b) to the Notifications dated March 31, 2021, and April 27, 2021, to be ultra vires the Relaxation Act, 2020, and consequently, bad in law and null and void. The Court quashed all the impugned notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officers were granted liberty to initiate fresh reassessment proceedings in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Act as amended by the Finance Act, 2021, and after complying with the required legal formalities. The decision was based on the common question of law and similarity of facts, relying on previous judgments from the Allahabad High Court, Rajasthan High Court, Delhi High Court, and this Court itself.
What were the facts?
The petitioners, Upasana Resources Pvt Ltd and others, are aggrieved by notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. They contend that these notices are barred by limitation and that the respondent Income Tax Authority failed to observe the statutory formalities prescribed under Section 148A of the Act, which became applicable from April 1, 2021. The petitioners are seeking to quash these reassessment notices issued after March 31, 2021. They also challenge Explanations A(a)(ii)/A(b) to Notifications No. 20 and 38, which extended the applicability of Section 148, 149, and 151 as they stood before March 31, 2021, to periods beyond that date, deeming these extensions ultra vires the parent legislation, the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the impugned notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, post March 31, 2021, are barred by limitation and whether the statutory formalities under Section 148A were observed. 2. Whether Explanations A(a)(ii)/A(b) to Notification No. 20 [S.O. 1432 (E) dated 31st March, 2021] and Notification No. 38 [S.O.1703 (E)] dated 27th April, 2021, to the extent they extend the applicability of Section 148, Section 149, and Section 151 of the Act as they stood on March 31, 2021, to the period beyond March 31, 2021, are ultra vires the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020. Assessee's Contentions: The notices under Section 148 are barred by limitation and statutory formalities under Section 148A were not followed. The Explanations to the Notifications extending the old provisions are ultra vires the Relaxation Act, 2020. Revenue's Contentions: No specific contentions for the revenue are recorded in the judgment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side Present :- Hon’ble Mr. Justice Md. Nizamuddin W.P.O. No. 457 of 2022 UPASANA RESOURCES PVT LTD Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. With W.P.O. No. 459 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 460 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 462 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 464 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 466 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 467 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 468 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 469 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 539 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 540 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 541 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 542 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 543 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 545 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 546 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 547 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 548 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 549 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 550 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 551 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 552 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 553 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 554 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 555 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 556 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 557 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 558 of 2022 For the Petitioners :- Mr. Subash Agarwal, Mr. Brijesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Swapna Das, Mr. Siddharth Das, Advocates
For the Respondents :- Ms. Sucharita Biswas, Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Mr. S.N. Dutta, Advocates Dated : 1st February, 2022
MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J. Heard Learned Counsels appearing for the parties.
2 In view of involvement of common question of law and similarity of facts in all these Writ Petitions, with the consent of the parties all these Writ Petitions have been heard together and are being decided by the present common judgement and order. Common facts and issues involved in all these Writ Petitions as appear on perusal of relevant record and upon considering the submissions of the parties are that the petitioners are aggrieved by the issuance of impugned notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the ground that the same are barred by limitation and the respondent Income Tax Authority concerned, before issuing the impugned notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, have not observed the statutory formalities under Section 148 A of the Income Tax Act as prescribed by the Finance Act, 2021 which are applicable with effect from 1st April, 2021 before issuance of notices under Section 148 of the Act on or after 1st April, 2021. Issues arising in all the present Writ Petitions are purely legal and in all these Writ Petitions the assessees/petitioners have sought relief of quashing of the impugned re-assessment notices issued post 31st March, 2021 by the respondent Income Tax Authority concerned under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, assessees/petitioners have also sought relief by way of a declaration declaring Explanations A(a)(ii)/A(b) to the Notification No. 20 [S.O. 1432 (E) dated 31st March, 2021 and Notification No. 38 [S.O.1703 (E)] dated 27th April, 2021 to the extent that the same extend the applicability of the “provisions of Section 148, Section 149 and Section 151 of the Act, as the case may be, as they stood as on the 31st March, 2021, before the
3 commencement of the Finance Act, 2021” to the period beyond 31st March, 2021 as ultra vires the parent legislation, viz., The Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (hereinafter referred to as ‘ Relaxation Act, 2020’). At the outset, all the counsels appearing for the parties jointly submitted that the issues involved in these Writ Petitions are covered by the decision of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court dated 30th September, 2021 in the case of ‘Ashok Kumar Agarwal –vs- Union of India through its Revenue Secretary North Block & Ors.’ (Writ Tax No. 524/2021) decided in favour of assessees/petitioners on 30.09.2021 and order of Rajasthan High Court dated 25th November, 2021 in the case of Bpip Infra Private Limited-vs.- Income Tax Officer, Ward 4 (1), Jaipur (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13297/2021) and the order of Delhi High Court 15th December, 2021 in the case of Man Mohan Kohli –vs- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. In (W.P. (C) 6176 of 2021) and judgement and order of this Court dated 17th January, 2022 in the case of Manoj Jain Vs. Union of India & Ors. In WPA No. 11950 of 2021 and in the case of Bagaria Properites and Investment Private Limited & Anr. In WPO 244 of 2021. In view of judgement and order of this Court dated 17th January, 2022 in the case of Manoj Jain Vs. Union of India & Ors. In WPA No. 11950 of 2021 and in the case of Bagaria Properties and Investment Private Limited & Anr. in WPO No. 244 of 2021, all these Writ Petitions herein are disposed of by allowing the same. Explanations A(a)(ii)/A(b) to the Notifications dated 31st March, 2021 and 27th April, 2021 are declared to be ultra vires the
4 Relaxation Act, 2020 and are therefore bad in law and null and void. All the impugned notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act are quashed with liberty to the Assessing Officers concerned to initiate fresh re- assessment proceedings in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Act as amended by Finance Act, 2021 and after making compliance of the formalities as required by the law. Urgent certified photo copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Md. Nizamuddin, J.) TR/
More judgments on Section 148
- Bha Associates Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs ACIT, Central Circle- 29, New DelhiITA 5208/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: Disposed6 Nov 2026AY 2015-16
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Jack And Jill vs. The Union Of INDIA And OrsGauhati · 5 Nov 2026
- Ms Akher Ali vs. The Union Of INDIAGauhati · 5 Nov 2026
- Paonta Hp Centre vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 5 Nov 2026
- M/S Multitech Agro INDIA (Opc) PVT LTD vs. The State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 5 Nov 2026
- Gopa Satya Madhava Subbarao vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 5 Nov 2026