NEWMOUNT VINIMAY PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side Present :- Hon’ble Mr. Justice Md. Nizamuddin W.P.O. No. 2049 of 2022 KHUSBAOO BEARING PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. With W.P.O. No. 2050 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 2051 of 2022, W.P.O. No. 2052 of 2022 For the Petitioners :- Ms. Swapna Das, Mr. Siddharth Das, Advocates

For the Respondents :- Mr. Smarajit Roy Chowdhury, Advocate Dated : 10th May, 2022

MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J. In compliance of my earlier orders, petitioner in these writ petitions have paid the costs and filed receipts, which are taken on record. Taking note of a judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court dated May 4, 2022 in the case of Union of India & Ors. V. Ashish Agarwal in Civil Appeal No. 3005 of 2022, it is clarified that by the earlier orders of this Court, the impugned notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and all proceedings under Section 147 of the old Act, which were quashed

2 with liberty to the assessing officer concerned to proceed in accordance with law, would now mean as per the law and guidelines laid down in the aforesaid judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Paragraphs 10, 11 and 12 of the aforesaid judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, which, according to me, have much relevance, are quoted below:- “10. In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, the present Appeals are ALLOWED IN PART. The impugned common judgements and orders passed by the High Court of judicature at Allahabad in W.T. No. 524/2021 and other allied tax appeals/petitions, is/are hereby modified and substituted as under:- (i) The impugned section 148 notices issued to the respective assesses which were issued under unamended section 148 of the IT Act, which were the subject matter of writ petitions before the various respective High Courts shall be deemed to have been issued under section 148A of the IT Act as substituted by the Finance Act, 2021 and construed or treated to be show-cause notices in terms of section 148A(b). The assessing officer shall, within thirty days from today provide to the respective assesses information and material relied upon by the

3 Revenue, so that the assesses can reply to the show- cause notices within two weeks thereafter; (ii) The requirement of conducting any enquiry, if required, with the prior approval of specified authority under Section 148A(a) is hereby dispensed with as a one-time measure vis-à-vis those notices which have been issued under Section 148 of the unamended Act from 01.04.2021 till date, including those which have been quashed by the High Courts. Even otherwise as observed hereinabove holding any enquiry with the prior approval of specified authority is not mandatory but it is for the concerned Assessing Officers to hold any enquiry, if required; (iii) The assessing officers shall thereafter pass orders in terms of Section 148A(d) in respect of each of the concerned asessees; Thereafter after following the procedure as required under Section 148A may issue under Section 148 (as substituted); (iv) All defences which may be available to the assessees including those available under Section 149 of the IT Act and all rights and contentions which may be available to the concerned assessees and Revenue under the Finance Act, 2021 and in law shall continue to be available.

4 11. The present order shall be applicable PAN INDIA and all judgements and orders passed by different High Courts on the issue and under which similar notices which were issued after 01.04.2021 issued under Section 148 of the Act are set aside and shall be governed by the present order and shall stand modified to the aforesaid extent. The present order is passed in exercise of powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India so as to avoid any further appeals by the Revenue on the very issue by challenging similar judgements and orders, with a view not to burden this Court with approximately 9000 appeals. We also observe that present order shall also govern the pending writ petitions, pending before various High Courts in which similar notices under Section 148 of the Act issued after 01.04.2021 are under challenge. 12. The impugned common judgements and orders passed by the High Court of Allahabad and the similar judgements and orders passed by various High Courts, more particularly, the respective judgements and orders passed by the various High Courts particulars of which are mentioned hereinabove, shall stand modified/substituted to the aforesaid extent only.” Accordingly, the respondent-assessing authorities concerned will now proceed with those

5 quashed notices and proceedings in accordance with the guidelines and law laid down as per aforesaid order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. It has been pointed out by Mr. Smarajit Roy Chowdhury appearing for the respondents that due to inadvertence in the order dated 26th April, 2022 instead of his name, the name of Mr. Tilak Mitra has been recorded and further that it has been recorded that “none appears for the respondents” while he had appeared in the matter. Let the order dated 26th April, 2022 be corrected accordingly. (Md. Nizamuddin, J.) TR/