C NARAYANASWAMY AND BROS (HUF) vs. UNION OF INDIA

PDF · subscribers
WP/22464/2026HC KarnatakaKAHC01049462202628 July 2026Bench: B M SHYAM PRASAD10 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court allowed the petition in part. While the petitioner agreed not to pursue the challenge to the vires of Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Court interfered with the reassessment proceedings based on the ground of lack of due opportunity. The Court noted that the revenue's counsel could not dispute that the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) mandates a minimum of seven days for responding to a show cause notice, and the petitioner was granted only six days. Consequently, the Court quashed the Reassessment Order dated 20.02.2026 (Annexure-B5), the Computation Sheet dated 20.02.2026 (Annexure-B6), the Demand Notice dated 20.02.2026 (Annexure-B7), and the Penalty Notices dated 20.02.2026 (Annexures-B8 and B9). The proceedings were restored to the Income Tax Officer, with liberty to the petitioner to file a response to the Show Cause Notice dated 28.01.2026. All other questions, except the challenge to Section 147A, were left open for consideration. The petitioner was directed to appear before the third respondent on 05.10.2026.

What were the facts?

The petitioner, C Narayanaswamy and Bros (HUF), filed a writ petition challenging various notices and orders issued by the Income Tax Department for Assessment Year 2020-21. These included notices under Section 142(1), a reassessment order under Section 147 read with Sections 144 and 144B, a computation sheet, demand notice under Section 156, show cause notices under Section 274 read with Sections 272A(1)(d) and 271AA(1), and notices and orders under Section 148A and Section 148. The petitioner also challenged the vires of Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The procedural history involves multiple notices and an assessment order culminating in a demand and penalty notices.

What were the issues?

1. Whether Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, void, and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India? (Question of constitutional law) 2. Whether the proceedings culminating in the reassessment order and subsequent notices were vitiated by a lack of due opportunity for the petitioner? (Question of mixed law and fact) Assessee's Contentions: The petitioner initially challenged the vires of Section 147A of the IT Act. However, the petitioner's counsel stated they would not pursue this grievance. The primary contention then became that the proceedings were flawed due to a lack of due opportunity. Specifically, the petitioner argued that the Show Cause Notice dated 28.01.2026 provided less than the seven days stipulated by the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for filing a response, as the response was due by 03.02.2026. Revenue's Contentions: The revenue's counsel did not dispute the petitioner's contention regarding the short period provided for response to the Show Cause Notice, acknowledging that the SOP prescribes a minimum of seven days and the petitioner was given only six days (excluding the date of notice). They agreed to consider restoring the proceedings with an opportunity for the petitioner to file a reply.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147A,Section 142(1),Section 147,Section 144,Section 144B,Section 156,Section 274,Section 272A(1)(d),Section 271AA(1),Section 148A,Section 148

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 22464 OF 2026 (T-IT) BETWEEN:

C NARAYANASWAMY AND BROS (HUF) REPRESENTED BY MR. NARAYANASWAMY, KARTA OF ERSTWHILE HINDU UNDIVIDED FAMILY (HUF) WHO IS REPRESENTED BY KOUSHAL, SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER FOR MR. NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS ILTHORE VILLAGE, HEGGANAHALLY POST DEVANAHALLY TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562110, KARNATAKA PAN AACHC9914 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANNAMALAI S., ADVOCATE) AND:

1.

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, KARTAVYA BHAVAN -1, NEW DELHI-110 001.

Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HC-KAR

2.

CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001.

3.

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(3)(1), BANGALORE, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU KARNATAKA 560095

4.

ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO. 401, 2ND FLOOR, E-RAMP JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI 110003.

5.

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(1)(1), BANGALORE BMTC BUILDING, 80FT ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, BENGALURU-560095. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NIRMAL MATHEW, CGSC FOR R1; SRI. M. DILIP A/W SRI. VINAYAKA S. PANDIT, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R5)

HC-KAR THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO HOLD THAT THE SECTION 147A OF THE ACT IN ANNEXURE

IS ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY, UNREASONABLE, VOID, UNFAIR AND VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLES 14 OF CONSTITUTION AND ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION AND QUASH THE SECTION 147A OF THE ACT AT ANNEXURE A; ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE NOTICE DATED 31.07.2025 UNDER SECTION 142(1) OF THE ACT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2020-21 BEARING DIN NO. ITBA/AST/F/142(1)/2025-26/1079140047(1) SAME IS ENCLOSED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE B1; ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE NOTICE DATED 27.08.2025 UNDER SECTION 142(1) OF THE ACT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2020-21 BEARING DIN NO. AND THE ITBA/AST/F/142(1)/2025-26/1080063936(1) SAME IS ENCLOSED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE B2; ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE NOTICE DATED 02.01.2026 UNDER SECTION 142(1) OF THE ACT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2020-21 BEARING DIN NO. ITBA/AST/F/142(1)/202526/1084361264(1) AND THE SAME IS ENCLOSED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE B3; ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 28.01.2026 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR HC-KAR 2020-21 BEARING DIN NO. ITBA/AST/F/147(SCN)/2025-26/1085203723(1) AND THE SAME IS ENCLOSED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE B4; ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 20.02.2026 UNDER SECTION 147 READ WITH SECTION 144 READ WITH SECTION 144B OF THE ACT PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2020-21 BEARING DIN NO. ITBA/AST/S/147/2025-26/1086304818(1) AND THE SAME IS ENCLOSED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE B5 .ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE COMPUTATION SHEET DATED 20.02.2026 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2020-21 BEARING DIN NO.ITBA/AST/S/330/2025- 26/1086306717(1) AND THE SAME IS ENCLOSED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE B6; VIII. ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE DEMAND NOTICE UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE ACT DATED 20.02.2026 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2020-21 BEARING DIN NO. ITBA/AST/S/156/202526/1086307025(1) AND THE SAME IS ENCLOSED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE B7; IX. ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 20.02.2026 UNDER SECTION 274 READ WITH SECTION 272A(1)(D) OF THE ACT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2020-21 BEARING DIN NO. ITBA/PNL/S/272A(1)(D)/2025-26/1086274840(1) AND THE SAME IS ENCLOSED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE B8; ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR HC-KAR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 20.02.2026 UNDER SECTION 274 READ WITH SECTION 271AA(1) OF THE ACT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2020-21 BEARING DIN NO. ITBA/PNL/S/271AA(1)/2025-26/1086313578(1) AND THE SAME IS ENCLOSED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE B9 .ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE NOTICE DATED 29.03.2024 UNDERSECTION 148A(B) OF THE ACT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2020-21 BEARING DIN NO. ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2023-24/1063589650(1) AND THE SAME IS ENCLOSED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE C1; ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 13.04.2024 UNDER SECTION 148A(D) OF THE ACT PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2020-21 BEARING DIN NO. ITBA/AST/F/148A/2024-25/1064078569(1) AND THE SAME IS ENCLOSED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE C2; ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE NOTICE DATED 13.04.2024 UNDER SECTION 148 OF THE ACT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2020-21 BEARING DIN NO. ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2024-25/1064078610(1) AND THE SAME IS ENCLOSED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE C3.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

HC-KAR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD

ORAL ORDER

The petitioner, while calling in question the vires of Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [for short, 'the IT Act'], has called in question the Notices issued under Section 142(1) of the IT Act and the conclusion of the proceedings resulting in the Reassessment Order dated 20.02.2026 and the further Demand and Penalty Notices under Section 156 and Section 274 read with Section 272A(1)(d) and 271AA(1) of the IT Act. The details of the impugned Notices and the Orders are as follows.

Sl. No.

Notices/ Orders/ computation sheet

Date Provisions of Income Tax Act, 1961

Annexures 1 Notice 31.07.2025 142(1) B1 2 Notice 27.08.2025 142(1) B2 3 Notice 02.01.2026 142(1) B3 4 Notice 28.01.2026 --- B4 5 Reassessment Order 20.02.2026 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s 144B B5 6 Computation Sheet 20.02.2026 ---- B6 7 Notice 20.02.2026 156 B7 8 Notice 20.02.2026 274 r.w.s. 272A(1)(d) B8 9 Notice 20.02.2026 274 r.w.s B9 HC-KAR 271AA(1) 10 Notice 29.03.2024 148A(b) C1 11 Order 13.04.2024 148A(d) C2 12 Notice 13.04.2024 148 C3

2 Mr. S. Annamalai, the learned counsel for the petitioner, is categorical in stating that the petitioner will not pursue the grievance with Section 147A of the IT Act and that this Court could consider restoring the proceedings interfering with the impugned Reassessment Order and the later proceedings on the short ground of lack of due opportunity. In this regard, the learned counsel submits that the petitioner is issued with the Show Cause Notice on 28.01.2026 with opportunity to the petitioner to file response by 03.02.2026 [less than seven days] when the Standard Operating Procedure [SOP] contemplates a minimum period of seven days.

3 Mr. M. Dilip, a learned Standing counsel who accepts notice for the second to fifth respondent, and Mr. Nirmal Mathew, the learned Standing HC-KAR Counsel who accepts notice for the first respondent, are heard for disposal of the petition. The learned Standing counsels submit that this Court could consider restoring the proceedings with opportunity to the petitioner to file reply to the Show Cause Notice if the petitioner does not pursue the grievance as against the constitutionality of Section 147A of the IT Act.

4 On the petitioner's grievance with the aforesaid Show Cause Notice, Mr. M. Dilip and Mr. Nirmal Mathew cannot dispute that the SOP prescribes a minimum period of seven days and the petitioner is only extended six days when the date of notice is excluded. It is in these circumstances that this Court is persuaded to interfere to set aside the Reassessment Order dated 20.02.2026 [Annexure - B5] and the subsequent proceedings. Hence, the following.

HC-KAR ORDER [A] The petition is allowed-in-part and the following are quashed restoring the proceedings to the Income Tax Officer, Office of the Income Tax Officer [the third respondent] reserving liberty to the petitioner to file response and the documents to the Show Cause Notice on 28.01.2026 [Annexure-B4].

Sl. No.

Notices/ Orders/ computation sheet

Date Provisions of Income Tax Act, 1961

Annex ures 1 Reassessment Order 20.02.2026 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s 144B B5 2 Computation Sheet 20.02.2026 ---- B6 3 Notice 20.02.2026 156 B7 4 Notice 20.02.2026 274 r.w.s. 272A(1)(d) B8 5 Notice 20.02.2026 274 r.w.s 271AA(1) B9

[B] The petitioner shall, without further notice appear before the third respondent on 05.10.2026 HC-KAR [C] The petitioner is reserved with liberty as and when enabled pursuant to this order, to file response to the Show Cause Notice dated 28.01.2026.

[D] It is needless to observe that all questions except insofar as the petitioner's grievance with regard to Section 147A of the IT Act are left open for consideration.

Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →