TEJI DEVI FAMILY TRUST vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

PDF · subscribers
CW/5881/2022HC RajasthanRJHC02029585202210 May 2022Bench: PRAKASH GUPTA,SAMEER JAIN3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that the writ petition was to be finally disposed of in terms of the order dated 04.05.2022 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ashish Agarwal. The Supreme Court, in its order, directed that impugned Section 148 notices issued under the unamended Section 148 of the IT Act, which were the subject of writ petitions before various High Courts, shall be deemed to have been issued under Section 148A of the IT Act as substituted by the Finance Act, 2021. These notices were to be construed as show-cause notices under Section 148A(b). The Assessing Officer was directed to provide information and material relied upon by the Revenue within thirty days, allowing assessees two weeks to reply. The requirement of conducting an enquiry under Section 148A(a) was dispensed with as a one-time measure for notices issued from 01.04.2021 till date. Thereafter, Assessing Officers were to pass orders under Section 148A(d) and then issue notices under Section 148 (as substituted). All defenses available to assessees and Revenue under the Finance Act, 2021, and law were preserved. The Supreme Court's order was made applicable PAN India and governed pending writ petitions.

What were the facts?

The petitioner, Teji Devi Family Trust, through its trustee Shri Naresh Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench. The petition challenged notices issued by the Income Tax Officer, Ward 5(1), Jaipur. The Central Board of Direct Taxes was also a respondent. The petitioner argued that the issue in their petition was covered by a recent Supreme Court order in the case of Union of India & Others Vs. Ashish Agarwal. The Supreme Court's order dealt with notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which were challenged before various High Courts.

What were the issues?

1. Whether notices issued under the unamended Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, prior to the substitution by the Finance Act, 2021, should be deemed to have been issued under Section 148A of the Act and treated as show-cause notices. Assessee's Contention: The petitioner contended that the issue raised in their writ petition was covered by the Supreme Court's order in Union of India & Others Vs. Ashish Agarwal (Civil Appeal No. 3005/2022 and batch). This order provided a specific mechanism for dealing with such notices. Revenue's Contention: The judgment does not explicitly record any specific contentions from the revenue in this particular writ petition. However, the Supreme Court's order in Ashish Agarwal was passed in appeals filed by the Union of India (Revenue), indicating their involvement in challenging High Court orders that quashed similar notices.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 148,Section 148A,Section 149

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5881/2022 Teji Devi Family Trust, Having Its Address At 211, Kanwar Nagar, Jaipur 302002 In The State Of Rajasthan Through Its Trustee Shri Naresh Kumar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Income Tax Officer, Ward 5(1), Jaipur Having Its Address At New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan Dass Road, Jaipur 302005 2. Central Board Of Direct Taxes, Ministry Of Finance, Having Its Address At North Block, New Delhi-110011 Through Its Chairman. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddharth Ranka, Advocate HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 10/05/2022 When this case came up for hearing today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue raised in this petition is covered by order dated 04.05.2022 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India & Others Vs. Ashish Agarwal (Civil Appeal No. 3005/2022 and batch of appeals). Following directions have been issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the aforesaid case: “10. In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, the present Appeals are ALLOWED IN PART. The impugned common judgments and orders passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in W.T. No. 524/2021 and other allied

(2 of 3) [CW-5881/2022] tax appeals/petitions, is/are hereby modified and substituted as under:- (i) The impugned section 148 notices issued to the respective assessees which were issued under unamended section 148 of the IT Act, which were the subject matter of writ petitions before the various respective High Courts shall be deemed to have been issued under section 148A of the IT Act as substituted by the Finance Act, 2021 and construed or treated to be show-cause notices in terms of section 148A(b). The assessing officer shall, within thirty days from today provide to the respective assessees information and material relied upon by the Revenue, so that the assessees can reply to the show-cause notices within two weeks thereafter; (ii) The requirement of conducting any enquiry, if required, with the prior approval of specified authority under section 148A(a) is hereby dispensed with as a one-time measure vis-à-vis those notices which have been issued under section 148 of the unamended Act from 01.04.2021 till date, including those which have been quashed by the High Courts. Even otherwise as observed hereinabove holding any enquiry with the prior approval of specified authority is not mandatory but it is for the concerned Assessing Officer to hold any enquiry, if required; (iii) The assessing officers shall thereafter pass orders in terms of section 148A(d) in respect of each of the concerned assessees; Thereafter after following the procedure as required under section 148A may issue notice under section 148 (as substituted); (iv) All defences which may be available to the assessees including those available under section 149 of the IT Act and all rights and contentions which may be available to the concerned assessees and Revenue under the Finance Act, 2021 and in law shall continue to be available. 11. The present order shall be applicable PAN INDIA and all judgments and orders passed by different High Courts on the issue and under which similar notices which were issued after 01.04.2021 issued under section 148 of the Act are set aside and shall be governed by the present order and shall stand modified to the aforesaid extent. The present order is passed in exercise of powers

(3 of 3) [CW-5881/2022] under Article 142 of the Constitution of India so as to avoid any further appeals by the Revenue on the very issue by challenging similar judgments and orders, with a view not to burden this Court with approximately 9000 appeals. We also observe that present order shall also govern the pending writ petitions, pending before various High Courts in which similar notices under Section 148 of the Act issued after 01.04.2021 are under challenge. 12. The impugned common judgments and orders passed by the High Court of Allahabad and the similar judgments and orders passed by various High Courts, more particularly, the respective judgments and orders passed by the various High Courts particulars of which are mentioned hereinabove, shall stand modified/substituted to the aforesaid extent only. All these appeals are accordingly partly allowed to the aforesaid extent. In the facts of the case, there shall be no order as to costs.” Accordingly, this writ petition is also finally disposed of in terms of order dated 04.05.2022 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Ashish Agarwal (supra), as stated above. The authorities concerned shall proceed to decide the matter in accordance with the directions issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in para 10 of the aforesaid order. Consequent upon the disposal of the writ petition, the stay application filed therewith does not survive and the same also stands disposed of accordingly. (SAMEER JAIN),J (PRAKASH GUPTA),J KuD/MR/8

More judgments on Section 148

All 35,022 judgments and leading authorities on Section 148 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →