Sri Nagaraju Vanka vs. The Income Tax Officer
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the writ petitions, referencing a previous identical writ petition (W.P.No.30153 of 2023) that was allowed and disposed of by an order dated 30.10.2023. The Court stated that in view of the identical nature of the matter already decided, it was inclined to allow these writ petitions in terms of the order passed in W.P.No.30153 of 2023. The reasoning cited was that the proceedings were not drawn in accordance with the amended provisions but under the unamended provisions, which was not sustainable. The Court noted that the right of the respondents would stand reserved as envisaged in paragraphs 37 & 38 of the earlier batch order (W.P.No.25903 of 2022 and batch), which allowed petitions on procedural flaws and reserved the Revenue's right to proceed further from the stage of the Supreme Court's order in Ashish Agarwal. Miscellaneous applications pending were closed, and no order as to costs was made.
What were the facts?
The petitioners, identified as Primary Agricultural Co-operative Societies and individuals, filed multiple writ petitions before the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. These petitions challenged orders passed under Section 148A(d) and notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for assessment years 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2018-19. The petitioners contended that these actions were illegal, arbitrary, and passed in gross violation of natural justice without application of mind. They sought a writ of mandamus to set aside these orders and notices and to suspend consequential proceedings. The respondents were the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and the Assessment Unit, National Faceless Assessment Centre.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the order passed by the Respondent under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the notice issued under Section 148 of the Act for the assessment year 2016-17 (in WP No. 33950/2023 and WP No. 34004/2023), and for assessment year 2015-16 (in WP No. 33954/2023 and WP No. 33955/2023), are illegal, arbitrary, and passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice without application of mind. Assessee's Contention: The petitioners argued that the reopening proceedings were initiated under the unamended provisions of the Act, despite the amended provisions (effective from 01.04.2021) requiring notices under Section 148A and faceless proceedings. They contended that the reopening was initiated by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer, violating the amended procedure. They relied on a previous batch of writ petitions decided by the same bench on 14.09.2023 (W.P.No.25903 of 2022 and batch). Revenue's Contention: The learned counsel for the Department did not dispute that similar objections had been decided in the aforesaid batch matters. However, they submitted that other objections were also raised by the petitioners.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
[ 3379 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION Nos. 33950 33954 33955 AND 34004 0F 2023 wRtT PETITION NO.33950 0F 2023 Between: The Primary Agrl. Co-op Socie 503201 . Rep., by its Secretary, Gangaram. Limited, Varni Village, Varni Mandal, Nizamabad - ri Daram Pedda Gangadhar, S/o. Sri Daram Pedda ty S ...PETITIONER AND 1. The Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle - 1, 6-2-15613, Subhash Nagar, Nizamabad - 503002. 2. Assessment Unit, National Faceless Assessment Centre, lncome Tax Department, Ministry of Finance, Room No.401, 2* Floor, E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Delhi - 110003. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction, especially one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS holding that the order passed by 1't Respondent u/s.148A(d) of the Act, d1.29.O3.2O23 with DIN & Notice No.ITBtuAST/F1148N2O22- 23t1O51622386(1) and the notice dated 30.03.2023 issued under section 148 of the Act with DIN & Notice No:ITBA/AST/S1148-]12022-23/1051624160(1)for the
2 assessment year 2O16_11, as being illegal, arbitrary and passed in gross violation of principres of naturar justice without apprication of mind, and consequently set aside the same. IA NO: 10F 2 23 Petition under section 15'1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to suspend the operation of the notice issued by rhe Respondent u/s. 14g of the Act, dt.30.03.2023 for the i)Assessment yeat 2o16_1r with DIN and Notice No.ITBA/AST/Sl14B 1t2O22-23t1O5162416O(1) and ail consequentiat proceedings thereto. WRIT PETITION NO:33954 0F 2023 Between: ili,,,,##li,%H,.":"T,tIH*:ff ,,X8!lXl,iff.X#t#3i.3,[,f E:33: AND 1. The lncome Tax Officer 503002 ...PETITIONER , Ward - 1, 6-2-15613 Subhash Nagar, Nizamabad _ Assessment Unit, Nationql_ Faceles^s Assessment Ce4tre, lncome Tax uepartment, Ministrv of Finance, noom r,lt. ifii, z-..Fro"il"E:Fr;;; Jawahadat Nehru Srddium, oetni _l ro'do'i ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 0t the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or direction, especially one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS hording that the order passed by 1'r Respondent u/s.148A(d) of the Act, dt. 08.04.2022 with DtN & Notice No:|TBA/AST/F t14BAI2O22_ 2 i I
-) 2311042667088( 1 ) ano the notice dated 12.o4.2022 issued under section 148 0f the Act with DrN & Notice No: ,rBA/AST/ 5r148-112022-23/1042717089(1) for the assessment year 2015-16, as being iregar, arbitrary and passed in gross vioration of principles of natural justice without application of aside the same. -._v !r,r,,v\r( dup cauon of mind, and consequenfly set petition under section 151 cpc prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the notice issued by the Respondent u/s.148 of the Act, dt'12'04 2022 for the assessment year 2015-16 with DrN & Notice No. rrBA/ ASTrs/148-112022-23/10427170s9(1) and a, consequentiar proceedings thereto. IANo:1oF2023 Between: AND 1 . The lncome 503002. 2. Assessment Department. Jawaharlal N WRIT PETITION NO: 339550F 2023 I 3l#;:3"1,y,#g?"i,B;i"',1ily*,,^81*?13!a:!id,;p,t67years, 8-17-1, S.N L ...PETITIONER Tax Officer, Ward - 1, 6-2-1S6t3, Subhash Nagar, Nizamabad - "ffibd;j"::tr#qi;fu fr '.i,."T.#,?sn,,Fi"Jl""fl R,Iil ...RESPONDENTS petition under Articre 2% of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or direction, especia,y one in the nature of wRrr oF MANDAMUS hording that the order passed by Respondenr u/s.148A(d) of the Acr, dt' 07'o4 2022 with DrN & Notice No:,rBA/AST/F 1148A/2022-2311042636419(1)
,l ,/'/' and the notice dated 07.o4.2022 issued under section 14g of the Act with DIN and Notice No: ITBA/AST/S/1 48_1 12o22-23t 1 042636442(1) for the assessmenr year 2015-16, as being illegal, arbitrary and passed in gross violation of principles of natural iustice without application of mind and consequently set aside the same. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the notice issued by the Respondent u/s.14g of the Act, dt. 07.04.2022 for the assessment year 2o1s-16 with DIN & Notice No:lrBA/ Asrlsl148-112022-2311042636442(1) and all consequential proceedings thereto. WRIT PETITION NO: 34004 0F 2023 Between: Primary Ag Nizamabad Ramulu. riculturg^ _Cooperative Credit Society Limited., Jakora, Varni Mandal, - 503201. Rep., by its Secretary, Sri Ramakrishnaiah'Rajula, S/o. S; ...PETITIONER AND 1. 2 The Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle - 1, 6-2-156t3, Subhash Nagar, Nizamabad - 503002. Assessment Unit, National Faceless Assessment Centre, lncome Tax o,9oa$m911. Ministry..of finqryu, BggT No 401, 2N rOor- e-namp- Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Dethi - 110 003 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or direction, especially one in the nature of wRlr oF MANDAluus holding that the order passed by Respondent u/s.148A(d) of the Act, dt.29.03.2023 with DIN & Norice No:|rBA/AST/F t1 4\At2o22-23l1 051 622063(1 )
Z /-s and the notice dated 30.03.2023 issued under section 148 of the Act with DIN & Notice No:ITBtuAST/S/148_112022-2311051624114{1) for the assessment year 2O16-17, as being illegal, arbitrary and passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice without application of mind, and consequently set aside the same. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the notice issued by the Respondent u/s.148 of the Act, dt.30.03.2023 for the assessment year 2016-17 wilh DIN and Notice No:ITBA/AST/S1148_112022-2311051624114(1) and all consequential proceedings thereto. Counsel for the Petitioner in all the Writ Petitions: SRI A. V. RAGHU RAM Counsel for the Respondents in all the Writ Petitions: SMT. SUNDARI R. PISUPATI, SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL FOR INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER J
7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI W.P.Nos.3395O 33954,33955 and 34OO4 of 2o23 COMMON ORDER (per Hon'ble Sri Justice P.SAM KOSfiy) When these matterr are taken up for hearing today, it has been informed by the parties that an identical Writ petition i.e., W.P.No.3O153 of 2023 has already been allowed and disposed of uide order, dated 3O.1O.2023. 2. In view of the fact that the identical matter has already been allowed by this court, we are inclined to allow these writ Petitions in terms of the order passed in W.p.No.3O lS3 of 2023 decided on 3O.1O.2O23 on similar terms. 3. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any in these Writ Petitions, shall stand closed. No order as to costs. SD/. P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGI?TRAR \,,t SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle - 1,6-2-15613, Subhash Nagar, Nizamabad - 503002. 2. The Assessment Unit, National Faceless Assessment Centre, lncome Tax Department, Ministry of Finance, Room No.401 , 2nd Floor, E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Delhi. 3. One CC to SRI A. V. RAGHU RAM, Advocate [OPUCI 4. One CC to SRI SUNDARI R. PISUPATI, Senior Standing Counsel for lncome Tax Department [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies Along with a copy of the Order dated 30.10.2023 in W.P.No.30153 ot 2023. MP GJ \i^/
7 I HIGH COURT DATED:1611212023 COMMON ORDER W.P.Nos.33950, 33954,33955 AND 34004OF 2023 ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS "{=^ ffo 1 1 JAI'J 2024 * €sparctr€o * 14 r(: S E H 1 oo 1
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSTTY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY W.P. No. 3O153 of 2O23 ORf,)ER: per Ho a'bte Si Justice P.SAM KOSHY) Heard Mr. A.V.A. Siva Kartikeya, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. B. Sapna Reddy, learned Junior Standing Counsel for Income Tax appearing for the respondents. Perused the entire record. 2. The instant petition has been filed chaltenging the Assessment Order passed by respondent No. 1 under section f48A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as'the Act') dated 25.04.2022 for the Assessment Year 2Ol8-19. 3. One of the contentions that the petitioner has raised in the present writ petition is that under the amended provisions of the Act which came into effect from 01.04'2021, the respondents while proceeding under Section 148 of the Act were required to issue notice under Section 148A and provide an opportunity of hearing to the assessee. As per the amended provision of law, the proceedings to be drawn are also in a faceless manner. Whereas, it has been contended by the petitioner that in the instant case, reopening has been initiated by the Juridictional Assessing Oflicer. In respect of the said objection that the petitioner had raised, he relied upon the recent batch of writ
) petitions decided by this very Bench on 14.O9 .2023 vide W.P.No.25903 of 2022 and batch to the limited extent. 4. lrarned counsel for the Department would not dispute of batch matters. having decided the said objection in the aforesaid However, learned counsel submits that apart from the aforesaid objection, there have been other various objections also which the petitioner has raised in the writ petition. 5. So far as this contention of the learned counsel for the Department is concerned, this Bench, while disposing of W.P.No.25903 of 2022 and batch had taken note of the same in paragraph Nos.37 & 38 which is reproduced herein under: "37. The preliminary objection raised by the petitioner is sustained and all these writ petitions stands allowed on this very jurisdictional issue. Since the impugned notices and orders are getting quashed on the point ofjurisdiction, we are not inclined to proceed further and decide the other issues raised by the petitioner which stands reserved to be raised and contended in an appropriate proceedings." 38. Since the Hon'ble Supreme Court had, in the case of Ashish Agarwal, supra, as a one-time measUre exercising the powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, permitted the Revenue to proceed under the substituted provisions, and this Court allowing the petitions only on the procedural flaw, the right conferred on the Revenue would remain reserved to proceed further if they so want from the stage of the order of the Supreme Court in the case ofAshish Agarwal, supra. 6. In view of the same, we are inclined to allow the present writ petition also on similar terms. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition stands allowed on the objection of the petitioner that the proceedings have not been drawn in accordance with the amended provision but under the unamended provision which is otherwise not sustainable.
As has been held by this Bench in the aforesaid batch matters, the right of the respondents would stand reserved as is envisaged in paragraph Nos.37 & 38 of the said batch. No order as to costs. 7 . Consequentiy, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. P.SAM KOSHY, J LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY, J Dated: 30.lO.2023 aqs
More judgments on Section 148A
- Rajesh Kumar Khandelwal, Jaipur vs ITO Ward 5(1), JaipurITA 21/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Kamleshkumar Somalal Bhatt, Himatnagar vs Income Tax Ofifcer, Ward 1, HimatnagarITA 2130/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Nitinbhai Nanalal Badani, Rajkot vs CIT (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal…ITA 658/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Greenlam Industries LTD And Another vs. The UOI And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Jyoti Consultants, Agrahat vs. Pr. Commissioner GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Sahoo Supply Agency vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And CustomsOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Gopal Aromatic PVT. LTD., Cuttack vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 3 Nov 2026