M/s Bhavya Constructions Private Limited vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

PDF · subscribers
WP/204/2025HC TelanganaHBHC01000323202528 April 2025Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA4 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court, in its order dated 29.09.2026, acknowledged the writ petition and the interim application. While the substantive issues of the writ petition were not decided on merits, the Court granted an interim stay of the impugned order and proceedings. This interim relief was granted in light of the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Diary No. 2196 of 2026 and batch, decided on 10.04.2026. The Court directed that the writ petition be listed along with a batch of similar matters. The operative direction was to grant an interim stay of the impugned order and proceedings, pending further orders.

What were the facts?

The petitioner, M/s Bhavya Constructions Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. The petition challenges an order dated 27.04.2023 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle - 1(1), Hyderabad, for the Assessment Year 2016-17. Additionally, the petition challenges a notice dated 27.04.2023, issued by the same authority under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the same assessment year. The petitioner seeks to declare these actions as arbitrary, illegal, bad in law, void-ab-initio, and violative of principles of natural justice and constitutional provisions. The petitioner also filed an interim application seeking a stay on all further proceedings and recovery pursuant to the Section 148 notice, pending the disposal of the writ petition.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the order dated 27.04.2023 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the notice dated 27.04.2023 issued under Section 148 of the Act for Assessment Year 2016-17 are arbitrary, illegal, bad in law, void-ab-initio, and violative of the principles of natural justice and constitutional provisions (Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 265) and Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Assessee's Contentions: The petitioner argues that the impugned order and notice are illegal, arbitrary, and violative of natural justice and constitutional rights. The petitioner relies on the Supreme Court's order in Diary No. 2196 of 2026 and batch, decided on 10.04.2026, for seeking an interim stay. Revenue's Contentions: The judgment does not record any specific contentions made by the revenue at this stage. The revenue is represented by Ms. Bokaro Sapna Reddy (Jr. SC for Income Tax).

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 148A,Section 148

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA WRIT PETITION NO: 204 OF 2025 Between: M/s Bhavya Constructions Private Limited, 8-2-2931821N 1 to 3, Plot No.- A-1, 1st Floor, Bhavya's Spoorthi Bhavan, Road No.- 1, Film Nagar, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 096, Telangana. Represented by its Managing Director, tvlr. Aditya Venigalla, S/o Mr. V-Ananda Prasad ...PETITIONER AND 1. The Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle - 1('l ), Hyderabad, Room No.- 722,7th Floor, lT Towers, AC Guards, Masab Tank, Hyderabad - 500 004, Telangana. 2. The Principal Chief Commissioner of lncome Tax,, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. Room No.- 922, ?lh Floor, 'B' Block, l.T.Towers, 10-2-3, AC Guards, Hyderabad - 500 004, Telangana. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax,, Circle - 'l(2), Hyderabad, lT Towers, AC Guards, lVasab Tank, Hyderabad - 500 004, Telangana. 4. Assessment Unit, lncome Tax Department, National e-Assessment Center New Delhi, Room No.- 4O1, 2nd Floor. E-Ramp. Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, New Delhi - 110 003 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or Direction, declaring- a.the order daled 27.04.2023, passed u/s 148A(d) of the Act, vide DIN and Notice No. ITBA/AST/Ft148Al2O23-2411O52407422(1 ), by the 1st Respondent, for the Assessment Year 2016 - 17 and b.the notice dated 27.04.2023, issued by the

1 st Respondent, u/s 148 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 , vide DIN and Notice- ITBA/AST/Si148 1|2023-2411052407550(1), for the Assessment Year 2016 - 17 as arbitrary, illegal, bad in law, void-ab-initio, violative of the principles of natural justice apart from being violative of Articles 14, 1S(1)(g) and 265 of the constitution of lndia and sec;. 14BA of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 , and consequently set aside the same in the interests of justice and to pass l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petilion under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supporl of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings, including any recovery, pursuant to the notice dated 27104t2023, issued by the 1st Respondent, u/s 148 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961, vide DtN & Notice- ITBA/AST/S/148_112023-2411052407550(1), for the Assessment Year 2016 - 17,, pending disposal of the abpve Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. A V A SIVA KARTIKEYA Counsel for the Respondents: MiS . BOKARO SAPNA REDDY (JR. SC FOR INCOME TAX) The Court made the following: ORDER List along with batch. Meanwhile, there shall be interim stay of the impugned order, in the light of the order granted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide its order Diary No.2196 of 2026 and batch decided on 10-4-2026. SD/. K.BHAVANI SWAMY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle - 1(1), Hyderabad, Room No.- 722,7th Floor, lT Towers, AC Guards, Masab Tank, Hyderabad - 500 004, Telangana. 6

TJ TKS 2. The Principal Chief Commissioner of lncome Tax,, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. Room No.- 922, }th Floor, 'B' Block, l.T.Towers, 10-2-3, AC Guards, Hyderabad - 500 004, Telangana. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax,, Circle - 1(2), Hyderabad, lT Towers, AC Guards, Masab Tank, Hyderabad - 500 004, Telangana. 4- Assessment Unit, lncome Tax Department, National e-Assessment Center New Delhi, Room No.- 401,2nd Floor. E-Ramp. Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, New Delhi - 110 003 5. The Section Officer, Writ D.B. Section, High Court for the State of Telagana, at Hyderabad. 6. The Section Officer, Posting Section, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. 7. One CC to Sri A V A Siva Kartikeya, Advocate [OPUC] 8. One CC to I\//s. Bokaro Sapna Reddy (Jr. SC for INCOI\/E TAX) [OPUC] 9. Two CD Copies d \

HIGH COURT DATED: 2910912026 ORDER WP.No.204 ot 20251 INTERIM STAY TWO DRAFTS LIST ALONG WITH BATCH P. L,/ iU 1! 0[T 21ffi '\.r.,J, '\:4. \\. -- 'i\- . ..(i- t---.-:-- (n

More judgments on Section 148A

All 3,543 judgments and leading authorities on Section 148A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →