COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II, HYDERABAD vs. M/S. GULF OIL CORPORATION LIMITED
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed in terms of CBDT Circular No.9 of 2024, dated 17.09.2024. This circular enhances the monetary limits for filing appeals by the Income Tax Department to reduce litigation, fixing the limit for appeals before the High Court at Rs.2.00 crore. The judgment notes that the tax effect in the instant appeal is well below this monetary limit. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed on this procedural ground. The court also stated that if the appeal falls within any exception provided in Circular No.5 of 2024, the Income Tax Department would be at liberty to seek revival of the appeal. No costs were awarded. The judgment does not address any substantive issues related to the assessment.
What were the facts?
The Revenue, Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Hyderabad, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order dated 25.09.2007 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Hyderabad Bench. This order was in relation to ITA No.403/Hyd/06 for Assessment Year 2004-05. The ITAT's order was itself preferred against an order dated 20.03.2006 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-III, Hyderabad, which in turn was against an order dated 15.12.2005 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 2(3), Hyderabad. The assessee is M/s Gulf Oil Corporation Ltd., Sanatnagar, Hyderabad. The appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the ITAT's decision.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable in light of the monetary limits prescribed by CBDT Circular No.9 of 2024, amending Circular No.5 of 2024, for filing appeals before the High Court. The Revenue's contention, as represented by Ms. K Mamata, Senior Standing Counsel, is that the appeal is being filed in accordance with the law. The judgment does not record specific arguments from the Revenue regarding the merits of the case, but rather focuses on the procedural aspect of the monetary limit. The Respondent (assessee) has not presented any arguments in the judgment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTIGE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA INCOME TAX TRIBUNA L APPEAL NO: 39 OF 2010 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under section 2604 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 , against the order dated 25-09-2007 passed in lTA.No.403/Hyd/06 for the Assessment Year 2004,05 on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ,A,, Hyderabad' preferred against the order dated 20-03.2046 passed in ITA No.302/ACtT-2(3)/ClT(A)-lll/05-06 on the file of the commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-lll, Hyderabad, preferred against the order dated 15-12-2005 {-- !J passed in No.G-165/AC2(3) on the file of the Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle 2(3), HYderabad. Commissioner of lncome Tax-ll, Hyderabad ...Appellant AND M/s Gulf Oil Corporation Ltd., Sanatnagar, Hyderabad ...Respondent Counsel for the APPellant Ms K Mamata, Senior Standing Counsel for lncome Tax Department Counsel for the Respondent : Sri Y Ratnakar The Court delivered the following Judgment : ,. *' ra L Between: I I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.39 OF 2OlO Heard Ms.X.Mamata, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Ta-x, apperrnng on behalf of the appellant. 2. The instant appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, has been preferred by the Revenue as the appellart against the :, \q order dated 25.09.2007 passed by the Income Ta-x Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad '4" Bench, Hyderabad, I.T.A.No.403/Hvd/06 for the 11-l Assessment Year 21004 O5 3. Central Boa.rd of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issued Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.Og.2024, amending the previous Circular No.5 of 2024 dated 15.03.2024, by further enhancing the monetar5z limits for filing appeals by the Income Tax Department before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunals, High Courts and Supreme Court as a measure for reducing litigation. In paragraph 2 of the said Circular, we find that the monetary limit fixed for filing an appeal before the High Court is Rs.2.OO crore. '1.. JUDGMENT'. @er tio t'bie iri Ju-sr,ce Psom Kosrtyl
Page 2 of 3 4 6 As a sequel, miscellaleous applications pending if any, sha11 stand closed. In the instant appeal, tax effect is well below the monetary limit' :> sd/- AV.s-s eRgti$EX* SECTION OFFICER To, VA/gh \qr L 2 3 4 The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal' Hyderabad Bench 'A" Hyderabad The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-lll' Hyderabad The Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax' Circle 2(3)' Hyderabad One CC to Ms K Mamata' Senior Standing Counsel for lncome Tax Department [OPUCI //TRUE COPY// Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri Y Ratnakar' 6. Two CD CoPies .& ," I 5. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed in terms of the aforesaid Circular No.9 of 2024 d,ated 17.09.2024' However, if the appeat comes within the exception of Circular No'5 of 2024 ' it would be open to the Income Tax Department to seek revival of the appeal._ No costs. I I i :
HIGH COURT DATED:301O112025 JUDGMENT ITTA.No.39 of 2010 DISMISSING THE ITTA \, i I I l I I *S4 K,* 16 APn zlE I T,A E I $ t- 1 )o .b Esp,11c t o i 4.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Saleem vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 3 Nov 2026
- Ms R Ess Iron And Steel PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And OrsGauhati · 3 Nov 2026
- Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee And Anr vs. Galactic Television And Communications PVT LTD And OrsDelhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Society For Human Resource Management Shrm vs. Strategic Hrm & Ors.Delhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Sanjay Kumar Jain & Anr. vs. Nandi Ayurved & Ors.Delhi · 3 Nov 2026