SRI RAMA MEDICAL AND SURGICAL AGENCIES vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX HYD.
What did the High Court hold?
The Tribunal held that once credits are reflected in the books of accounts in the corresponding assessment years, they must be taken into account while making the block assessment. This principle, established in a prior High Court decision (I.T.T.A.No.21 of 1999), dictates that such credits cannot be disallowed. As a corollary to this finding, the Tribunal reasoned that the interest that has accrued on these credits must also be considered. Therefore, the appeals were allowed, directing that the appellant is entitled to the deduction of interest on credits noted in search operations, provided these credits were reflected in the books of accounts in the corresponding assessment years. The operative direction is to allow the deduction of interest. No issue was expressly left undecided.
What were the facts?
The appeals challenge a common order dated August 2, 2002, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Hyderabad Bench 'B', concerning block assessment proceedings. The core dispute revolves around the disallowance of credits identified during search operations. The appellant argued that these credits were already reflected in the books of accounts for the corresponding assessment years, and therefore, should not have been disallowed in the block assessment. Consequently, the appellant claimed interest on these credits. The judgment notes that a similar issue regarding the disallowance of credits in the context of the same search was previously decided by the High Court in I.T.T.A.No.21 of 1999.
What were the issues?
1. Whether, in the context of block assessment following search operations, credits reflected in the books of accounts for the corresponding assessment years can be disallowed? (Question of law, concerning Section 158BB of the Income Tax Act, 1961). 2. If credits reflected in the books of accounts are not to be disallowed, should the interest accrued on such credits be taken into account for the purpose of block assessment? (Question of mixed law and fact, concerning Section 158BB of the Income Tax Act, 1961). Assessee's contentions: The credits were already reflected in the books of accounts for the relevant assessment years, and thus, there was no basis for their disallowance in the block assessment. Consequently, interest accrued on these credits should be allowed. Revenue's contentions: The judgment does not record specific contentions made by the revenue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
I.T.T.A.Nos.1, 20, 25, 27 & 28 OF 2003
COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy)
In this batch of Income Tax Appeals field under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, a common order, dated 02.08.2002, passed by the Hyderabad Bench ‘B’ of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) in I.T.A.Nos.235 to 239/Hyd/2002, is challenged.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and Sri S. R. Ashok, learned counsel for the respondent.
The controversy is about the disallowance of the credits, which were taken note of during the search operations. The appellant pleaded that the credits were, in fact, reflected in the books of accounts in the corresponding assessment years and there was no basis for disallowing them in the block assessment. As a corollary of this, it claimed interest on such credits.
The matter pertaining to the disallowance of credits in respect of the appellant itself, that too in relation to the very search, was dealt with by this Court in I.T.T.A.No.21 of 1999. Through order dated 29.12.2011, a Division Bench of this Court took the view that once credits are reflected in the books of accounts in the corresponding assessment years, the same needs to be taken note of while making the block assessment. From this premise, it flows that the interest that has accrued on the credits must also be taken into account. Hence, we allow the appeals and direct that the appellant is entitled to deduction of interest on such of the credits noted in search operations, which were reflected in the books of accounts in the corresponding assessment years.
There shall be no order as to costs.
The miscellaneous petitions filed in the appeals shall stand disposed of.
_____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.
______________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J. 20.08.2014 KH
More judgments on Section 158BB
- The ITO, Ward-3(2)(1), Ahmedabad vs Rumalji Bhikhaji Thakor Legal Heir of Late…ITSSA 545/AHD/2019[2012-13]Status: Disposed24 Apr 2026AY 2012-13
- Shailesh Goyal, Tonk vs ACIT, Centre Circle Jaipur, JaipurITA 496/JPR/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Jul 2025AY 2016-17
- Rajendra Popat Shinde Lh Minaxi Rajendra… vs DCIT Circle Dhule, MaharastraITSSA 1/PUN/2019[1988-89]Status: Disposed26 Jun 2025AY 1988-89
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Malbros International Pvt Ltd, FaridkotITA 993/CHANDI/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed25 Jun 2025AY 2016-17
- M/S. Electronics Components vs ACIT, New DelhiITSSA 28/DEL/2009[]Status: Disposed29 May 2025
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Alok Kumar Sethi, Bhubaneswar vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 10 Nov 2026
- Natuk Mra vs. The Union Of INDIA And 3 OrsGauhati · 10 Nov 2026
- Tatvam Procon Private Limited, Gujarat vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 10 Nov 2026
- Swapna Acharya vs. Superintendent, GST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar-1Orissa · 10 Nov 2026
- M/S. Ashok Panda, Dhenkanal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax , CT And GST Circle, DhenkanalOrissa · 10 Nov 2026