CENTRE FOR INNOVATION IN SCIENCE AND SOCIAL ACTION vs. UNION OF INDIA,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court disposed of the writ petition with a direction. If the petitioner files a stay petition in its appeal (Ext.P6) within two weeks from the date of the order, the first appellate authority shall consider and pass orders on the stay petition after hearing the petitioner. Crucially, any proceedings for recovery of the amounts demanded in Ext.P5 shall remain suspended until the first appellate authority passes an order on the stay petition. The court did not decide on the merits of the appeal or the rectification application, focusing solely on the interim relief of staying recovery.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Centre for Innovation in Science and Social Action, a public charitable institution, filed its income tax return for assessment year 2022-23 claiming exemption and refund. The return was processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, resulting in a demand of Rs. 14,99,860/-. The petitioner appealed this demand and also filed an application for rectification under Section 154. The petitioner apprehended recovery proceedings pending the appeal and had not been able to upload a stay petition. The Income Tax Department, through its Standing Counsel, agreed to keep recovery proceedings in abeyance if a stay petition was filed within two weeks.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to a stay of recovery proceedings pending the disposal of its appeal before the first appellate authority? Assessee's Contention: The petitioner, a charitable institution, filed an appeal against an order demanding Rs. 14,99,860/- for AY 2022-23 and also filed a rectification application. It apprehended recovery proceedings while the appeal was pending and faced difficulties uploading a stay petition. The petitioner sought a direction to stay recovery proceedings. Revenue's Contention: The revenue, through its Standing Counsel, submitted that if the petitioner filed a stay petition within two weeks, recovery proceedings could be kept in abeyance until a decision was taken on the stay petition by the first appellate authority.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 16TH PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 8819 OF 2024 PETITIONER: CENTRE FOR INNOVATION IN SCIENCE AND SOCIAL ACTION REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY DR.MR.C.SURESH KUMAR ,DEEPTHI, WEST OF TEMPLE, PARASSALA P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN – 695 502. BY ADV MARY BENJEMIN RESPONDENTS: 1 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI, PIN – 110 001. 2 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC,BANGALORE, PIN – 560 500. 3 INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), O/O THE INCOME TAX OFFICER ,EXEMPTION WARD, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, FIRST FLOOR, KOWDIAR P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 003. 4 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, DELHI, PIN – 110 001. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 8819 OF 2024 2 JUDGMENT The petitioner claims to be a public charitable institution entitled to exemption from payment of income tax under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961. According to the petitioner, for the assessment year 2022-23, the petitioner filed a return of income claiming exemption from income tax liability and refund of tax deducted at source. It is submitted that the returns filed by the petitioner were processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act resulting in demand for a sum of Rs.14,99,860/- for the assessment year 2022- 23(Ext.P5). The petitioner has preferred an appeal against Ext.P5. According to the petitioner, it has also filed an application for rectification under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act. The petitioner apprehends that pending consideration of the appeal by the first appellate authority, proceedings may be taken to recover the amounts determined as payable by the petitioner through Ext.P5. It is submitted that the petitioner has not been able to upload a stay petition in the appeal filed against Ext.P5. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Income Tax Department would submit that if the petitioner were to file a stay petition in Ext.P6 appeal within a period of two weeks from today, any
WP(C) NO. 8819 OF 2024 3 proceedings for recovery of amounts determined as payable in terms of Ext.P5 can be kept in abeyance till a decision is taken on the stay petition by the first appellate authority. 3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Income Tax Department, this writ petition will stand disposed of directing that if the petitioner files a stay petition in Ext.P6 appeal, within a period of two weeks from today, the first appellate authority shall consider such stay petition and pass orders on the same after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Till such time as orders are passed on the stay petition to be filed by the petitioner as above, any proceedings for recovery of amounts determined as payable by the petitioner in terms of Ext.P5 shall remain suspended. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE DK
WP(C) NO. 8819 OF 2024 4 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 8819/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE INCOME TAX RETURNS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE YEAR 2019-2020 ON 31.10.2019 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 04.05.2020 OF THE YEAR 2019-2020 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT DATED 04.04.2023 IN W.P.(C) NO. 12016 OF 2023 Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT NO. 910496120311222 DATED 31.12.2022 OF INCOME TAX RETURNS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2022- 23 Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2022-23 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED NIL Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST EXHIBIT P2,BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 09.12.2023 Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE RECTIFIED ORDER DATED 09.01.2024 U/S154, ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE, ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Shree Jagannath Associates, Angul vs. The Chief Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, CuttackOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Sampat Raj Jain vs. The State Of Assam And 3 Ors.Gauhati · 3 Nov 2026
- Sri Hardik Gowda vs. Sri Jayaram PKarnataka · 3 Nov 2026
- Shiv Ram vs. State Of Hp And OrsHimachal Pradesh · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Ampl Resources PVT. LTD., Through Sri Om Prakash Pareek, Authorised Signatory vs. The State Of JharkhandJharkhand · 3 Nov 2026