V BINU vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS-III)

PDF · subscribers
WP(C)/8191/2015HC KeralaKLHC01054031201517 March 2015Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR4 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

As the provided text is an excerpt from a writ petition filing and does not contain the judgment of the Tribunal, it is impossible to ascertain what the Tribunal decided, the reasoning behind its decision, or the ratio decidendi. Consequently, there are no operative directions, findings on any issues, or any mention of issues left undecided. The text does not provide any basis for determining the Tribunal's holding.

What were the facts?

The petitioner, V. Binu, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala challenging an order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals-III). The petition also impleads the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax as respondents. The specific assessment year(s) and the nature of the order or action under challenge are not detailed in the provided text. The procedural history leading to this writ petition is also not elaborated. The amount in dispute, if any, is not mentioned.

What were the issues?

The provided text does not contain sufficient information to identify the specific issues the Tribunal had to decide, nor does it record the arguments presented by the petitioner or the revenue. Therefore, it is not possible to frame the questions of law or mixed law and fact, name the relevant provisions, or detail the contentions of each side, including any authorities, circulars, or precedents relied upon. The judgment is silent on these aspects.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/26TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 8191 of 2015 (Y) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- V.BINU, AGED 45 YEARS, S.B.BHAVAN, ANACODE, VAVARAMBALAM KOITHOORKONAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.T.K.ANANDA KRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS-III) INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, KERA BHAVAN, KOCHI 682016 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, CENTRAL CIRCLE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695001 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-I THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695001 R BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 8191 of 2015 (Y) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1- THE TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 18.12.2010 EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE PERIOD 2005-2006 EXT.P3-TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE PERIOD 2006-2007 EXT.P4-TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE PERIOD 2007-2008 EXT.P5- TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE PERIOD 2008-2009 EXT.P6-TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE PERIOD 2009-2010 EXT.P7- TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL NO. 165 OF 2011 EXT.P8- TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL NO. 166 OF 2011 EXT.P9- TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL NO. 167 OF 2011 EXT.P10- TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL NO. 168 OF 2011 EXT.P11- TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL NO. 169 OF 2011 EXT.P12- TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P13- TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER IN REPLY TO EXHIBIT P12 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL. --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.8191 OF 2015 (Y) ----------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of March, 2015 J U D G M E N T Against Exts.P2 to P6 assessment orders under the Income Tax Act, the petitioner has preferred Exts.P7 to P11 appeals before the 1st respondent and the same is stated to be pending before the 1st respondent. In the meanwhile, Ext.P12 demand notice has been served on the petitioner for recovery of the amounts confirmed against him by the assessment orders. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also the learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents. 3. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petition with the following directions: 1. The 1st respondent shall consider and pass orders on Exts.P7 to P11 appeals within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner.

W.P.(C).No.8191/2015 2 2.It is made clear that no recovery steps for recovery of amounts confirmed against petitioner pursuant to Exts.P2 to P6 assessment orders shall be kept in abeyance till orders are passed by the 1st respondent as directed above and communicated to the petitioner. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE prp

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →