MUTTIL PANCHAYATH PRAVASI HARITHA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY vs. UNION OF INDIA
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that a petitioner who has already invoked the statutory remedy of appeal cannot maintain a writ petition. Consequently, the Court directed the 4th respondent (Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/Income-Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre) to consider the application for condonation of delay expeditiously. If the delay is condoned, the 4th respondent is further directed to consider the stay petition (Ext.P15) expeditiously and dispose of the same. This entire exercise is to be completed within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. Until such time, there will be a stay of recovery proceedings pursuant to the assessment order (Ext.P6). The issue of violation of natural justice was not decided on merits.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Muttil Panchayath Pravasi Haritha Co-operative Society, filed a writ petition challenging an assessment order (Ext.P6). The petitioner contended that the assessment order was passed in violation of the principles of natural justice. The assessment order is appealable under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner had already filed an appeal (Ext.P14) against the assessment order before the 4th respondent (Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/Income-Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre), along with an application for condonation of delay. A stay petition (Ext.P15) was also filed. The High Court heard the parties.
What were the issues?
1. Whether a writ petition can be maintained when a statutory appeal is available and has been invoked by the petitioner? (Question of law) The petitioner argued that the assessment order was passed in violation of natural justice. The revenue, represented by Adv. Keerthivas Giri, the learned standing counsel for the income tax department, did not appear to have made specific arguments on the maintainability of the writ petition, but the court's decision implies a contention that the statutory remedy should be pursued. The judgment does not record specific arguments from the revenue regarding the violation of natural justice or the maintainability of the writ petition.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 16TH JYAISHTA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 20375 OF 2024 PETITIONER: MUTTIL PANCHAYATH PRAVASI HARITHA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY AGED 62 YEARS W-316, MUTTIL, WAYANAD- 673 122, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, M.ALI, S/O ABDURAHMAN KUTTY, AGE 62 YEARS, ALIF HOUSE, MUTTIL POST, KALPETTA, WAYANAD, PIN – 673 122. BY ADVS. P.A.MOHAMMED SHAH RENOY VINCENT SHAHIR SHOWKATH ALI CHELSON CHEMBARATHY ABEE SHEJIRIK FASLA N.K MUHAMED JUNAID V. ADITH KRISHNAN.U. SHERIN SHERIYAR AFEEFA NAFEESA C.C. RESPONDENTS: 1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI, PIN – 110 001. 2 THE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON, NORTH BLOCK , NEW DELHI, PIN – 110 001. 3 THE NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE MAYUR BHAWAN, CONNAUGHT LANE, BARAKHAMBA, NEW DELHI, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (NAFAC)., PIN – 110 001.
WP(C) NO. 20375 OF 2024 : 2 : 4 ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME-TAX OFFICER NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE (NATIONAL E- ASSESSMENT CENTRE), NEW DELHI, P, PIN – 110 001. 5 THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (KERALA), CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, I.S. PRESS ROAD, KOCHI, PIN – 682 018. 6 ASSESSING OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, KALPETTA, WAYANAD, PIN – 673 122. 7 INCOME TAX OFFICER INTELLIGENCE & CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION, OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER INTELLIGENCE & CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MANACHIRA, KOZHIKODE, PIN – 673 001. 8 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS), INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE (NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE), NEW DELHI, PIN – 110 001. BY ADVS. P.G. JAYASHANKAR PGJ KEERTHIVAS GIRI T.C. KRISHNA, SENIOR PANEL COUNSEL. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 20375 OF 2024 : 3 : JUDGMENT
The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging Ext.P6 assessment order, contending, inter alia, that the same has been passed in violation of the principles of natural justice. 2. Ext.P6 assessment order is appealable under Section 246 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner has already preferred Ext.P14 appeal against Ext.P6 before the 4th respondent. The appeal has been filed along with an application for condonation of delay. The petitioner has also preferred Ext.P15 stay petition. 3. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Adv. Keerthivas Giri, the learned standing counsel for income tax department.
WP(C) NO. 20375 OF 2024 : 4 : 4. A petitioner who has already invoked the statutory remedy of appeal cannot maintain this writ petition. 5. Ext.P6 being a statutory appeal, there will be a direction to the 4th respondent to consider the application for condonation of delay, as expeditiously as possible. If the delay is condoned, the 4th respondent shall consider Ext.P15 stay petition expeditiously thereafter and dispose of the same expeditiously. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such time there will be a stay of recovery proceedings pursuant to Ext.P6. Sd/- MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE SRJ
WP(C) NO. 20375 OF 2024 : 5 : APPENDIX OF WP(C) 20375/2024 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE AUDIT CERTIFICATE DATED 24.09.2018 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER SOCIETY DURING THE RELEVANT FINANCIAL YEAR. Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED NIL INTIMATING THE DISPATCH OF THE PAN CARD. Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE NEW PAN CARD WITH NUMBER AAMAM5979P ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER SOCIETY DATED NIL. Exhibit P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 10.01.2019 RECEIVED BY THE PETITIONER SOCIETY FROM THE 7TH RESPONDENT. Exhibit P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER WHICH WAS ATTACHED WITH THE DOCUMENTS PRODUCED BEFORE THE 7TH RESPONDENT DATED 21.01.2019. Exhibit P6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 26.12.2023 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 147 READ WITH SECTION 144 READ WITH SECTION 144B. Exhibit P7 THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DEMAND DATED 26.12.2023 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE ACT. Exhibit P8 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPUTATION SHEET DATED 26.12.2023 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE ACT. Exhibit P9 THE TRUE COPIES OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICES ISSUED UNDER SECTION 274 READ WITH 272A(1)(D). Exhibit P10 THE TRUE COPIES OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICES ISSUED UNDER SECTION 274 READ WITH 271AAC(1) OF THE ACT DATED 26.12.2023.
WP(C) NO. 20375 OF 2024 : 6 : Exhibit P11 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 21.03.2022 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 148A(B) OF THE ACT. Exhibit P12 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 06.04.2022 ISSUED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 148A (D) OF THE ACT. Exhibit P13 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 06.02.2023 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. Exhibit P14 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 14.03.2024 FILED IN FORM 35A BEFORE THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) OR THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS). Exhibit P15 A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION DATED 15.03.2024 FILED BEFORE THE RESPONDENT. Exhibit P16 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 10.05.2024 ISSUED BY THE 8TH RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 250 OF THE ACT. Exhibit P17 A TRUE COPY OF THE GROUNDS FOR APPEAL IN WORD FILE FORMAT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 30.05.2024. Exhibit P18 TRUE COPY OF SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE DATED 10.04.2024 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 274 READ WITH 272A(1)(D). Exhibit P19 TRUE COPY OF SHOW-CAUSE NOTICES DATED 10.04.2024 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 274 READ WITH 271AAC(1) OF THE ACT DATED.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Alok Kumar Sethi, Bhubaneswar vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 10 Nov 2026
- Natuk Mra vs. The Union Of INDIA And 3 OrsGauhati · 10 Nov 2026
- Tatvam Procon Private Limited, Gujarat vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 10 Nov 2026
- Swapna Acharya vs. Superintendent, GST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar-1Orissa · 10 Nov 2026
- M/S. Ashok Panda, Dhenkanal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax , CT And GST Circle, DhenkanalOrissa · 10 Nov 2026