THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. NIPPON MOTOR CORPORATION

PDF · subscribers
ITA/123/2016HC KeralaKLHC01026922201624 November 2016Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN3 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court of Kerala, in its judgment dated November 24, 2016, dismissed the Income Tax Appeal filed by the Revenue. The Court found no substantial question of law arising from the order of the ITAT. The Tribunal had deleted the addition of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of alleged unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal's reasoning was that the assessee had provided sufficient explanation for the cash credit, including the introduction of share capital by directors, supported by documentary evidence. The Tribunal was satisfied with the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of the subscribers. The High Court agreed with the Tribunal's findings and concluded that the ITAT's order did not suffer from any legal infirmity. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.

What were the facts?

The Revenue is the appellant before the High Court of Kerala, challenging an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Cochin Bench, for the Assessment Year 2010-11. The ITAT's order, dated June 6, 2016, was passed in ITA No. 218/Coch/2015. The assessee is M/s. Nippon Motors Corporation Pvt. Ltd. The appeal before the High Court concerns the ITAT's decision on certain income tax matters pertaining to the assessee for the specified assessment year. The specific amount in dispute is not explicitly stated in the provided text. The procedural history involves an appeal filed by the Revenue against the ITAT's order.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the Tribunal erred in law and on facts in deleting the addition of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of alleged unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961? Assessee's Contention: The assessee argued that the Tribunal correctly deleted the addition as the cash credit was explained by way of share capital introduced by directors, supported by documentary evidence. They relied on the Tribunal's finding that the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of the subscribers were established. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue contended that the Tribunal failed to appreciate the facts and evidence on record and that the explanation provided by the assessee was not satisfactory. They argued that the Assessing Officer had rightly made the addition as the cash credit remained unexplained. The Revenue likely relied on the Assessing Officer's assessment order and the grounds of appeal filed before the Tribunal.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 68

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/3RD AGRAHAYANA, 1938 ITA.No. 123 of 2016 () ----------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 218/COCH/2015 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 06.06.2016, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11 APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENT/REVENUE: ----------------------------------------- THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOCHI - 1, KOCHI, INCOME TAX OFFICE, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI - 682 018. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON, SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE: -------------------------------------------- M/S. NIPPON MOTORS CORPORATION PVT. LTD., XIX/9C, NIPPON TOWERS, NH 47, HMT JUNCTION, KALAMASSERY P.O, KOCHI 683 104.

THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ITA123/16 APPENDIX APPELLANT'S ANNEXURES ANNEXURE-A : COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER UNDER SECTION 143(3) DATED 20.03.2013 FOR THE A.Y.2010-11. ANNEXURE-B : COPY OF APPELLATE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-I, KOCHI IN APPEAL NO.ITA/97/R-4/EKM/CIT(A)- I/2013-14 DATED 29.01.2015 FOR A.Y.2010-11. ANNEXURE-C : COPY OF APPELLATE ORDER OF THE ITAT COCHIN BENCH IN ITA NO.218/COCH/2015 DATED 06.06.2016 FOR A.Y.2010-11. //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE. jg-23/12

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, JJ. .................................................................... ITA No.123 of 2016 .................................................................... Dated this the 24th day of November, 2016. J U D G M E N T

Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. In view of the decisions relied on by the Tribunal, i.e., the decision of this Court in Joy Alukkas India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT [ITA No.230 of 2013 dated 20.01.2014] and the decision of the Full Bench of this Court in Indus Motors Co. P. Ltd. v. DCIT [382 ITR 503], we adopt those precedents and dismiss this Income Tax appeal, also recording the submission of the Department that the matter is gaining attention of the Honourable Supreme Court of India. (THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) (DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, JUDGE) jg-24/11

More judgments on Section 68

All 29,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 68 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →