THE C.W.T.,PATIALA vs. MAHARAJA AMARINDER SINGH KARTA OF HUF
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned order of the Tribunal, and restored the matter to the Tribunal for adjudication afresh. The Court noted that similar questions had been remitted to the Tribunal in prior cases (ITR No. 5 of 1996, GTR No. 1 of 1983, and ITR Nos. 216 and 218 of 1999). Given that the revenue's contention regarding the remittal was not contested by the assessee, and following the precedent of previous remittals, the High Court found it appropriate to remand the matter back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision on the substantial questions of law concerning the nature of the property. The specific amount in dispute was not recorded.
What were the facts?
The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala (the revenue) filed multiple appeals (WTA Nos. 21, 15, 16, 22, 27, and 31 of 2002) against the order dated 25.05.2001 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). The appeals concerned the nature of property held by Sh. Amarinder Singh, specifically whether it was Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) property or individual property. The revenue contended that the issue had been remitted to the Tribunal for adjudication in prior proceedings. The assessee, represented by Maharaja Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF or Sh. Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF, did not contest the revenue's assertions regarding the prior remittal.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the property in the hands of Sh. Amarinder Singh is HUF property or individual property, as per the provisions of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The revenue argued that the substantial question of law regarding the nature of the property (HUF vs. individual) had already been remitted to the Tribunal for adjudication in terms of earlier orders, specifically ITR No. 5 of 1996 and GTR No. 1 of 1983. The revenue requested the High Court to follow this precedent. The assessee's counsel did not contest the revenue's assertions regarding the prior remittal and could not submit anything to the contrary.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Wealth Tax Act, 1957
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Wealth Tax Appeal No. 21 of 2002 Wealth Tax Appeal No. 21 of 2002 Wealth Tax Appeal No. 21 of 2002 Wealth Tax Appeal No. 21 of 2002 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH Wealth Tax Appeal No. 21 of 2002. Wealth Tax Appeal No. 21 of 2002. Wealth Tax Appeal No. 21 of 2002. Wealth Tax Appeal No. 21 of 2002. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala ...Appellant ...Appellant ...Appellant ...Appellant Versus Versus Versus Versus Maharaja Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF Maharaja Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF Maharaja Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF Maharaja Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF ...Respondent ...Respondent ...Respondent ...Respondent AND AND AND AND Wealth Tax Appeal No. 15 of 2002. Wealth Tax Appeal No. 15 of 2002. Wealth Tax Appeal No. 15 of 2002. Wealth Tax Appeal No. 15 of 2002. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala ...Appellant ...Appellant ...Appellant ...Appellant Versus Versus Versus Versus Sh. Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF Sh. Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF Sh. Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF Sh. Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF ...Respondent ...Respondent ...Respondent ...Respondent AND AND AND AND Wealth Tax Appeal No. 16 of 2002. Wealth Tax Appeal No. 16 of 2002. Wealth Tax Appeal No. 16 of 2002. Wealth Tax Appeal No. 16 of 2002. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala ...Appellant ...Appellant ...Appellant ...Appellant Versus Versus Versus Versus Sh. Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF Sh. Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF Sh. Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF Sh. Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF ...Respondent ...Respondent ...Respondent ...Respondent AND AND AND AND Wealth Tax Appeal No. 22 of 2002. Wealth Tax Appeal No. 22 of 2002. Wealth Tax Appeal No. 22 of 2002. Wealth Tax Appeal No. 22 of 2002. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala ...Appellant ...Appellant ...Appellant ...Appellant Versus Versus Versus Versus Maharaja Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF Maharaja Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF Maharaja Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF Maharaja Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF ...Respondent ...Respondent ...Respondent ...Respondent KANCHAN 2015.01.08 13:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Wealth Tax Appeal No. 21 of 2002 Wealth Tax Appeal No. 21 of 2002 Wealth Tax Appeal No. 21 of 2002 Wealth Tax Appeal No. 21 of 2002 2 AND AND AND AND Wealth Tax Appeal No. 27 of 2002. Wealth Tax Appeal No. 27 of 2002. Wealth Tax Appeal No. 27 of 2002. Wealth Tax Appeal No. 27 of 2002. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala ...Appellant ...Appellant ...Appellant ...Appellant Versus Versus Versus Versus Maharaja Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF Maharaja Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF Maharaja Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF Maharaja Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF ...Respondent ...Respondent ...Respondent ...Respondent AND AND AND AND Wealth Tax Appeal No. 31 of 2002. Wealth Tax Appeal No. 31 of 2002. Wealth Tax Appeal No. 31 of 2002. Wealth Tax Appeal No. 31 of 2002. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. Date of Decision : 06.01.2015. The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala ...Appellant ...Appellant ...Appellant ...Appellant Versus Versus Versus Versus Sh. Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF Sh. Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF Sh. Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF Sh. Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF ...Respondent ...Respondent ...Respondent ...Respondent CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S. WALIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S. WALIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S. WALIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S. WALIA Present: Ms. Savita Saxena, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate for the respondent. *** Rajive Bhalla, J.(Oral) Rajive Bhalla, J.(Oral) Rajive Bhalla, J.(Oral) Rajive Bhalla, J.(Oral) By way of this order, we shall dispose of WTA Nos. 21, 15, 16, 22, 27 and 31 of 2002 titled as 'The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patiala Vs. Maharaja Amarinder Singh Karta of HUF'. The revenue is before us challenging order dated 25.05.2001 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (here-in-after referred to as the 'Tribunal'). The substantial questions of law essentially relate to the nature of the property in the hands of Sh. Amarinder Singh, namely, whether it is HUF or individual property. Counsel for the revenue submits that the said question has been KANCHAN 2015.01.08 13:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Wealth Tax Appeal No. 21 of 2002 Wealth Tax Appeal No. 21 of 2002 Wealth Tax Appeal No. 21 of 2002 Wealth Tax Appeal No. 21 of 2002 3 remitted to the Tribunal for adjudication in terms of order dated 23.09.2004 passed in ITR No. 5 of 1996, which is in turn based upon order dated 20.05.2004 passed in GTR No. 1 of 1983. Counsel for the assessee while opposing the prayer for remand is not in a position to contest the correctness of the aforesaid assertions or submit anything on the contrary. We have heard counsel for the parties, perused the questions of law and as similar questions have already been remitted to the Tribunal in ITR No. 5 of 1996 decided on 23.12.2007 based on findings in GTR No. 1 of 1983, decided on 20.05.2004 and order dated 12.12.2013 in ITR Nos. 216 and 218 of 1999, we allow the appeal, set- aside the impugned order and restore the matter to the Tribunal for adjudication afresh. (RAJIVE BHALLA) (RAJIVE BHALLA) (RAJIVE BHALLA) (RAJIVE BHALLA) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE (B.S. WALIA) (B.S. WALIA) (B.S. WALIA) (B.S. WALIA) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE January 06, 2015. January 06, 2015. January 06, 2015. January 06, 2015. kanchan KANCHAN 2015.01.08 13:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Ritika Ispat PVT. Limited, Balanda, Sundargarh vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- M/S.Ritika Ispat PVT. LTD.,Balanda, Sundergarh vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Biswanath Pradhan vs. The Principal Commnr., CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- M/S.Ritika Ispat PVT. LTD.,Balanda, Sundergarh vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- M/S Shree Sai Jagannath, Rourkela, Sundargarh vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, BhubaneswarOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
