ROBINDRA SHARMA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 5 DELHI

PDF · subscribers
W.P.(C)/16191/2025HC DelhiDLHC01081033202517 October 2025Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Assessing Officer (AO) to consider the petitioner's prayer for the release of the seized amount of Rs. 29,00,000 along with interest in accordance with the law. The AO was given a period of six weeks from the date of the order to decide the matter and communicate the decision to the petitioner. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the AO's decision, they are at liberty to pursue available legal remedies. The court did not decide on the merits of the claim for release or interest but mandated a decision by the AO.

What were the facts?

The petitioner, Robindra Sharma, filed a writ petition seeking the release of Rs. 29,00,000 seized during search and seizure proceedings. The petitioner also claimed applicable interest under Section 132B(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, both till the date of assessment and at 12% from the date of assessment until payment. The High Court referred to two previous orders: one in W.P.(C) 10732/2025 concerning the release of jewellery and cash, and another in W.P.(C) 14777/2025 where seized cash of Rs. 70,00,000 was released, but the issue of interest was pending. The respondent, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 5, Delhi, accepted notice.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the seized amount of Rs. 29,00,000 should be released to the petitioner along with applicable interest under Section 132B(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, considering the pendency of assessment proceedings? Assessee's Contention: The petitioner seeks the immediate release of the seized amount and interest, implying that retention without a pending demand or concluded assessment is unjustified. Revenue's Contention: The respondent, represented by learned Senior Standing Counsel, accepted notice, and the court proceeded to direct the Assessing Officer to consider the prayer.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

132B(4)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 16191/2025 CM APPL. 66265/2025 ROBINDRA SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin Gupta and Mr. Ayush Chauhan, Advs. along with petitioner in person versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 5 DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, SSC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR O R D E R %

17.10.2025 1. This petition has been filed with the following prayer:- “(a) Pass an appropriate Writ/Order/Direction, directing the Respondent to immediately release the seized amount of Rs. 29,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Nine Lakhs only) which was seized during the course of the search and seizure proceedings, along with the applicable interest under Section 132B(4) of The Income Tax Act, 1961 till the date of assessment and 12% interest from the date of assessment till the date of payment thereof, to the Petitioner” 2. In effect, the petitioner is seeking the release of amount of Rs. 29 lakhs along with the interest, seized during the course of search and seizure proceedings. Our attention has been drawn to order dated 24.07.2025 in W.P.(C) 10732/2025 and order dated 13.10.2025 in W.P.(C) 14777/2025, which read as under:- W.P.(C) 10732/2025 “3. This petition has been filed with the following prayers: “a) That this Hon’ble High Court be pleased to give directions to This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/10/2025 at 12:54:25

the Respondents to immediately release the jewellery items seized pertaining/belonging to the petitioner, in the favour of petitioner of Rs. 43,96,417/- grossly weighing at 1246.48 grams and the net weight being 1165.61 grams, valued by the Respondents/-(as per the valuation report dated 22.04.2015 of the department valuer)as per the details mentioned in Annexure P-1; b) That this Hon’ble High Court be pleased to give directions to the Respondents to immediately release the cash amounting to Rs. 3.5 lacs which was seized during the course of the search and seizure proceedings in the case of the Petitioner along with the applicable interest; c) Such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case..” 4. In effect the petitioner is seeking release of jewellery items and cash amount of Rs. 3.5 lakhs, which were seized. 5. Counsel for the petitioner states that as of today there is no demand pending which needs to be satisfied by the petitioner as such there is no reason for the respondents to retain the jewellery and the cash. She also states that the application was made on 09.06.2023 for the release of the jewellery and the cash of Rs. 3.5 lakhs which has not been decided. 6. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as the application has been filed by the petitioner for the release of jewellery and cash, it would be appropriate to direct the respondent to decide the application of the petitioner within a period of eight weeks, as an outer limit. The respondent will communicate the decision to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of”. W.P.(C) 14777/2025 “1. This petition has been filed with the following prayer:- (a) Pass an appropriate Writ/Order/Direction, directing the Respondent to immediately release the seized amount of Rs.70,00,000/- (Rupees Seventy Lakhs only) which was seized during the course of the search and seizure proceedings, along with the applicable interest under Section 132B(4) of The Income Tax Act, 1961 till the date of assessment and 12% interest from the date of assessment till the date of payment thereof, to the Petitioner; and” 2. On the last date of hearing, the learned counsel for the respondent had sought time to take instructions. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the seized amount of Rs.70.00 Lacs has been released to the petitioner on 03.10.2025. His only submission is that the interest thereon This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/10/2025 at 12:54:25

has not been granted. 3. On this, Mr Sunil Agarwal, submits that the issue of grant of interest shall be considered by the Assessing Officer (AO) within a period of six weeks from today, as an outer limit. 4. If that be so, we dispose of the writ petition by directing the AO to consider the issue of grant of interest in accordance with law and communicate its decision to the petitioner. If the petitioner is entitled to the interest, the same shall be released within four weeks thereafter, but if the petitioner is aggrieved by any order to be passed, liberty shall be with the petitioner to seek the remedy, as available in accordance with law. 5. The petition is disposed of.” 3. Mr. Siddharth Sinha, learned Senior Standing Counsel, accepts notice for the respondent. As the issue is with regard to the release of the amount, we dispose of the writ petition directing the Assessing Officer to consider the prayer made by the petitioner for the release of the seized amount along with interest in accordance with law and decide the same within a period of six weeks from today. 4. The decision thereof be communicated to the petitioner. If aggrieved, liberty is with the petitioner to seek such remedy as available in law. 5. The writ petition is disposed of. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J VINOD KUMAR, J OCTOBER 17, 2025 cd This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/10/2025 at 12:54:25

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →