JYOTI CARIAPPA SAIKIA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 5, DELHI & ANR.

PDF · subscribers
W.P.(C)/15103/2023HC DelhiDLHC01046922202321 February 2025Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR2 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the High Court hold?

The Delhi High Court held that the writ petitions have become infructuous. This conclusion was based on the submission made by the learned counsel for the writ petitioner. The submission stated that pursuant to the completion of assessment proceedings under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the returned income has been duly accepted. The Court accepted this submission and consequently ordered the disposal of the petitions as infructuous. No specific findings were made on the merits of the original grounds of challenge in the writ petitions, as they were rendered moot by the subsequent developments in the assessment proceedings. The operative direction was to dispose of the petitions.

What were the facts?

The petitioner, Jyoti Cariappa Saikia, filed five writ petitions before the Delhi High Court. These petitions challenged actions or orders related to assessment proceedings. The respondent in all petitions was the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 5, Delhi, and another respondent. The counsel for the petitioner stated that the assessment proceedings under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, have been completed and the returned income has been accepted. Consequently, the writ petitions have become infructuous.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the writ petitions have become infructuous due to the completion of assessment proceedings under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and acceptance of the returned income? (Question of fact and law) Assessee's contention: The petitioner's counsel argued that the completion of assessment proceedings under Section 153C and the acceptance of the returned income have rendered the writ petitions infructuous. Therefore, the petitions should be disposed of on this basis. Revenue's contention: No specific contention was recorded for the revenue in the provided text.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 153C

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (4 matters)

W.P.(C) 15086/2023
W.P.(C) 15102/2023
W.P.(C) 15103/2023
W.P.(C) 15104/2023

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

$~46 to 50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 15086/2023 & CM APPL. 60281/2023 (Stay)

JYOTI CARIAPPA SAIKIA

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Wadhwa, Ms. Ragini Handa and Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Advs.

versus

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 5, DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through: Mr. Vipul Agrawal, SSC and Mr. Gaoraang Ranjan, Adv. 47 + W.P.(C) 15102/2023 & CM APPL. 60351/2023 (Stay)

JYOTI CARIAPPA SAIKIA

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Wadhwa, Ms. Ragini Handa and Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Advs.

versus

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 5, DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through: Mr. Vipul Agrawal, SSC and Mr. Gaoraang Ranjan, Adv. 48 + W.P.(C) 15103/2023 & CM APPL. 60353/2023 (Stay)

JYOTI CARIAPPA SAIKIA

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Wadhwa, Ms. Ragini Handa and Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Advs.

versus

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 5, DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through: Mr. Vipul Agrawal, SSC and Mr. Gaoraang Ranjan, Adv. 49 + W.P.(C) 15104/2023 & CM APPL.60355/2023 (Stay)

JYOTI CARIAPPA SAIKIA

.....Petitioner This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:10:50

Through: Mr. Ajay Wadhwa, Ms. Ragini Handa and Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Advs.

versus

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 5, DELHI & ANR.

....Respondents Through: Mr. Vipul Agrawal, SSC and Mr. Gaoraang Ranjan, Adv. 50 + W.P.(C) 15105/2023 & CM APPL.60357/2023 (Stay)

JYOTI CARIAPPA SAIKIA

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Wadhwa, Ms. Ragini Handa and Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Advs.

versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 5, DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through: Mr. Vipul Agrawal, SSC and Mr. Gaoraang Ranjan, Adv. CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR

O R D E R %

21.02.2025

Learned counsel for writ petitioner submits that pursuant to the completion of assessment proceedings under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act 1961, the returned income has been duly accepted and thus, the writ petitions have been rendered infructuous. Consequently, they shall stand disposed of as such.

YASHWANT VARMA, J.

HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. FEBRUARY 21, 2025/nd This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:10:50

More judgments on Section 153C

All 9,619 judgments and leading authorities on Section 153C →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →