MS ASHISH AGENCIES vs. COMMISSIONER IT

PDF · subscribers
ITR/1/2008HC Himachal PradeshHPHC01001275200824 November 2009Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. AHUJA4 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court disposed of all the appeals by stating that the substantial questions of law raised were no longer res integra. This was in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax versus Ghanshyam (HUF), (2009) 315 ITR 1(SC). The judgment does not elaborate on the specific findings of the ITAT or the reasoning of the High Court beyond this reference. Therefore, the specific findings on the two issues framed, the reasoning leading to them, and the ratio decidendi are not detailed in the provided text. The operative directions are to dispose of the appeals in light of the Supreme Court's decision.

What were the facts?

These appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla, challenge common orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The respondents are various individuals (Shri Narain Dass (late), Sabir Dass, Shri Dhundi Ram, Smt. Krishna Devi, Shri Sita Ram, Shri Lachhu Ram, Shri Lumbru Ram, Shri Shyam Lal, and Shiva Nand). The core issue revolves around the taxability of interest included in enhanced compensation received by the assessees. The ITAT had ruled that this interest could not be taxed until appeals against the enhanced compensation award were finally decided, and that interest actually received was not taxable in the year of receipt as it had not yet accrued, despite the assessees not following a specific accounting method for such interest.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was correct in holding that the interest comprised in the amount of enhanced compensation received unconditionally by the assessee could not be taxed as income until the appeals, if any, against the award of enhanced compensation were finally decided by the higher Courts? (Question of law turning on Section 45(5) of the Income Tax Act). 2. Whether the ITAT was correct in holding that the interest on enhanced compensation actually received by the assessee was not taxable in the year of receipt on the ground that such interest had not yet accrued, ignoring the fact that the assessee was not following any method of accounting for such interest and hence, under Section 5 of the Income Tax Act, read with Section 145 and Section 45(5), such interest was taxable on the basis of receipt? (Question of mixed law and fact turning on Sections 5, 145, and 45(5) of the Income Tax Act). Assessee's contentions: Not recorded in the judgment. Revenue's contentions: Not recorded in the judgment.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 5,Section 145,Section 45(5)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA ITAs No.47,48,49,50,54,55,56 of 2007 and 1,9 & 11 of 2008

Date of decision : December 9, 2011

ITA No.47/2007

Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla

…Appellant.

Versus Shri Narain Dass (late) through Chinta Devi V&PO Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur Bushehr, District Shimla.

…Respondent. ITA No.48/2007

Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla

…Appellant.

Versus Sabir Dass, resident of V&PO Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur Bushehr, District Shimla.

…Respondent. ITA No.49/2007

Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla

…Appellant.

Versus Shri Dhundi Ram son of Shri Totu Ram, resident of V&PO Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur Bushehr, District Shimla.

…Respondent. ITA No.50/2007

Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla

…Appellant.

Versus Smt. Krishna Devi wifie of Shri J.R. Negi, Resident of V&PO Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur Bushehr, District Shimla.

…Respondent. ITA No.54/2007

Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla

…Appellant.

Versus Shri Sita Ram son of Shri Mulku, Resident of V&PO Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur Bushehr, District Shimla.

…Respondent.

…2…

ITA No.55/2007

Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla

…Appellant.

Versus Shri Lachhu Ram, resident of V&PO Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur Bushehr, District Shimla.

…Respondent. ITA No.56/2007

Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla

…Appellant.

Versus Shri Lumbru Ram c/o Shri Thoin Ram, resident of V&PO Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur Bushehr, District Shimla.

…Respondent. ITA No.1/2008

Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla

…Appellant.

Versus Shri Lumbru Ram c/o Shri Thoin Ram, resident of V&PO Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur Bushehr, District Shimla.

…Respondent. ITA No.9/2008

Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla

…Appellant.

Versus Shri Shyam Lal son of Shri Shiva Nand, resident of V&PO Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur Bushehr, District Shimla.

…Respondent. ITA No.11/2008

Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla

…Appellant.

Versus Shiva Nand, resident of V&PO Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur Bushehr, District Shimla.

…Respondent.

…3…

Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge.

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Appellants : Mr. Vishal Mohan, Advocate.

For the Respondents : Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate.

Rajiv Sharma, Judge

Since common questions of law and facts are involved in all the appeals, the same were taken up together and are being disposed of by a common judgment. 2. Following common substantial questions of law were framed in all these appeals: i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble ITAT was correct in holding that the interest comprised in the amount of enhanced compensation received unconditionally to the assessee could not be taxed as income until the appeals if any, against the award of enhanced compensation were finally decided by the higher Courts?

ii) Whether the Hon’ble ITAT was correct in holding that the interest on enhanced compensation actually received by the assessee was not taxable in the year of receipt on the ground that such interest had not yet accrued, ignoring the fact that the assessee was not following any method of accounting for such interest

Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

…4…

and hence, under Section 5 of the Income Tax Act, read with Section 145 and Section 45(5), such interest was taxable on the basis of receipt?

3.

It is jointly represented by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties that the substantial questions of law raised in these appeals are no more res integra, in view of the law laid down by their Lordships of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax versus Ghanshyam (HUF), (2009) 315 ITR 1(SC). Consequently, all the appeals are disposed of.

( R.B. Misra ), J.

December 9, 2011(sd)

( Rajiv Sharma ), J

More judgments on Section 5

All 847 judgments and leading authorities on Section 5 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →