INNOVATIVE FILM ACADEMY PRIVATE LIMITED(OPC) vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the petition in part. It held that in the given circumstances, the petitioner must be granted another opportunity to produce the relevant confirmation certificates. The Court reasoned that this would allow the Assessing Officer to examine the certificates as intended by the communication dated March 16, 2026, and verify if they relate to the material already on record. Consequently, the Assessment Order dated March 24, 2026, and the Penalty Notices dated March 24, 2026, were quashed. The petitioner was granted liberty to upload the confirmation certificates pursuant to the communication dated March 16, 2026, as and when enabled by the authority subsequent to this order.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Innovative Film Academy Private Limited (OPC), filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenging an Assessment Order dated March 24, 2026, passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for Assessment Year 2024-25. The petitioner also challenged penalty notices issued under Sections 274 read with 271AAC(1), 271D, and 271E of the Act, dated March 24, 2026, which were consequential to the assessment order. The petitioner's grievance stemmed from an inability to upload confirmation certificates after being granted a limited opportunity by a communication dated March 16, 2026, which allowed only two days for submission.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the petitioner should be granted another opportunity to produce confirmation certificates, as permitted by the communication dated March 16, 2026, and have them examined by the Assessing Officer, considering the limited time provided and subsequent blocking of access to upload? The assessee argued that they attempted to secure the confirmation certificates in good faith after receiving the communication dated March 16, 2026. However, they could not upload them by the deadline of March 18, 2026, as their access was blocked. The impugned order was passed shortly thereafter. The assessee sought restoration of proceedings to provide these certificates. The revenue, through its standing counsel, was heard on the matter.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144B,Section 271AAC(1),Section 271D,Section 271E,Section 274
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 20615 OF 2026 (T-IT)
BETWEEN:
INNOVATIVE FILM ACADEMY PRIVATE LIMITED(OPC) NO.135, OUTER RING ROAD, VARTHUR HOBLI, MARTHAHALLI, BANGALORE-562109 PAN AADCI7377L ALSO AT SARAVANA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O LATE TJ VENUGOPAL, NO. 22/131, F BLOCK, BDA MIG FLATS, DOMLUR 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-560071 REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT.2013
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR S V., ADVOCATE) AND:
INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, RAMNAGAR 562159
NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/ INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO. 401, 2ND FLOOR, E-RAMP,
Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI - 110003.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M. THIRUMALESH, ADVOCATE)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S 144B OF THE ACT 24/03/2026, ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2025-26/1087822212(1) ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2024-25 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A. II) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 274 R.W.S 271AAC(1) OF THE ACT ITBA/PNL/S/271AAC(1)/2025-26/1087822295(1) THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2024-25 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A1. III) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 274 R.W.S 271D OF THE ACT ITBA/PNL/S/271D/2025-26/1087822297(1) THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2024-25 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A2. IV) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 274 R.W.S 271E OF THE ACT ITBA/PNL/S/271E/2025-26/1087822299(1) THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2024-25 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A3.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner's grievance is with the Assessment Order dated 24.03.2026 [Annexure-A] under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This Assessment Order is for the assessment year 2024-25. The petitioner has also called in question the Penalty Notices [as per Annexures A1 to A3] which are consequent to Annexure - A. Mr. Ravi Shankar S V, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner seeks interference for restoration of the proceedings with an opportunity provide confirmation certificates as permitted in the Communication dated 16.03.2026.
Mr. Ravi Shankar S V submits that, upon receipt of this Communication which allowed only two days' time [i.e., until 18.03.2026], the petitioner bonafide attempted secure Confirmation
Certificates from third parties. The petitioner could not upload the Certificates after 18.03.2026 because the access was blocked and the impugned order is within 6 days thereafter. Mr. M. Thirumalesh, the learned Standing counsel who accepts notice for the respondents, is heard on the afore.
This Court is of the view that in the circumstances, there must be another opportunity to the petitioner to produce the relevant Confirmation Certificates so that the Assessing Officer can, as intended in the Communication dated 16.03.2026, examine those Certificates to verify whether it relates to the material already placed on record by the petitioner. Hence, the following. ORDER
[A] The petition is allowed in-part.
[B] The impugned Assessment Order dated 24.03.2026 [Annexure - A] and the Penalty Notices dated 24.03.2026
[Annexures - A1 to A3] are quashed reserving liberty to the petitioner to upload Confirmation Certificates pursuant to the Communication dated 16.03.2026 as and when enabled by the Authority consequent this Order.
Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
More judgments on Section 144B
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Mohammed Javed Bhati, Sikar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, SikarITA 994/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sri Mohanraj vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 4 Nov 2026
- Shobha Kumari vs. State Of Bihar And AnrPatna · 3 Nov 2026
- Distributory Committee vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner 1Andhra Pradesh · 3 Nov 2026
- Smt. T.Leela vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 3 Nov 2026
- Divikolu Subba Rao vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 3 Nov 2026