SYED HUMAYUN vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing all the impugned notices and orders. The decision was based on the concession made by the Revenue before the Apex Court in the case of 'Union of India and Others v. Rajeev Bansal', which was followed by a Division Bench of the same High Court in 'Income Tax Officer, Ward-6[3][1] and Others v. Venkatala Iyappa Rajanna'. The Division Bench had opined that reassessment proceedings commenced with notices under Section 148 for the Assessment Year 2015-16, issued after 01.04.2021, must be dropped. Since the notices in the present case were issued on 29.06.2021 and 27.07.2022, the same principle was applied. The Court explicitly stated that other issues canvassed by the petitioner were not examined and were left open.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Syed Humayun, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenging various notices and orders issued by the Income Tax Department for the Assessment Year 2015-16. These included a notice under Section 148 dated 29.06.2021, a show cause notice under Section 148A(b) dated 23.05.2022, an order under Section 148A(d) dated 27.07.2022, a notice under Section 148 dated 27.07.2022, an intimation letter dated 28.07.2022, a re-assessment order under Section 147 r.w.s. 144, 144B dated 08.05.2023, a penalty notice under Section 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) dated 08.05.2023, a penalty order under Section 271(1)(b) dated 01.03.2024, and a penalty order under Section 271(1)(c) dated 07.03.2024. The petitioner also sought to declare Section 147A of the Act as ultra vires. The core of the dispute revolved around the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated after 01.04.2021 for AY 2015-16.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the Notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year 2015-16, issued after 01.04.2021, could be sustained in light of the concession made by the Revenue before the Apex Court in 'Union of India and Others v. Rajeev Bansal'. Assessee's Contention (Implied): The issuance of notices under Section 148 for AY 2015-16 after 01.04.2021 is invalid due to the Revenue's concession before the Supreme Court, as confirmed by a Division Bench of this Court in 'Income Tax Officer, Ward-6[3][1] and Others v. Venkatala Iyappa Rajanna'. Revenue's Contention: Not recorded in the judgment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 148,Section 148A,Section 147,Section 144,Section 144B,Section 274,Section 271(1)(c),Section 271(1)(b),Section 147A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 18633 OF 2026 (T-IT) BETWEEN:
SYED HUMAYUN AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, S/O SYED NOOR MUHAMMAD, FLAT NO. D203, 2ND FLOOR, SAF SNOWDROPS APARTMENT, KONANAKUNTE CROSS, BANGALORE 560062 PAN ABEPH2795Q …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVI SHANKAR S V.,ADVOCATE) AND:
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 6(1)(1)
JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD) CIRCLE 6(1)(1)
NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/ INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT,
Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO. 401, 2ND FLOOR, E RAMP, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI 110003
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BANGALORE 3 BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA,
PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX KARNATAKA AND GOA REGION, NO.1 CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU 560001
UNION OF INDIA REP BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, KARTAVYA BHAVAN 1, NEW DELHI 110 001
CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN, KARTAVYA BHAVAN - 1 NEW DELHI 110 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.M. DILIP, ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE NOTICE U/S 148 OF THE ACT, DATED 29/06/2021 (DIGITALLY
SIGNED ON 30/06/2021) ITBA/AST/S/148/2021-22/1033843923(1), ISSUED BY 2015-16 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE - A. II) QUASHING THE NOTICE U/S 148A(B) OF THE ACT, 23/05/2022 ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1043117346(1), ISSUED BY 2015-16 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A1. III) QUASHING THE ORDER U/S 148A(D) OF THE ACT, 27/07/2022, ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1044152103(1) ISSUED BY 2015-16 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE A2. IV) QUASHING THE NOTICE U/S 148 OF THE ACT DATED 27/07/2022 ITBA/COM/F/17/2022- 23/1043981859(1) ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 MARKED AS ANNEXURE A3.V) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE INTIMATION LETTER DATED 28/07/2022 FOR NOTICE U/S 148 OF THE ACT ITBA/AST/S/91/2022- 23/1044211550(1), ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 MARKED AS ANNEXURE - A4.VI) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT
OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER PASSED U/S 147 R.W.S 144, 1448 DATED 08/05/23023 BEARING ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1052661214(1) PASSED NO.2 ANNEXURE A5.VII) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE PENALTY NOTICE U/S 274 R.W.S 271(1)(C) OF THE ACT DATED 08/05/23023 BEARING ITBA/PNL/S/270A/2023-24/1052661371(1), NO.2 ANNEXURE - A6.VIII) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE PENALTY ORDER U/S 271(1)(B) OF DIN 01/03/2024 ACT ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(B)/2023-24/1061851200(1), ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE - A7.IX) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER PASSED U/S 271(1)(C) OF THE ACT DATED 07/03/2024 NO.ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(C)/2023-24/1062176267(1) NO.3 ANNEXURE - A8.X) ISSUE AN APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, DECLARING THAT SECTION
147A OF THE ACT IS ULTRA VIRES THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND CONSEQUENTLY STRIKE DOWN THE SAME, ENCLOSED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE - A9.XI) AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE OPERATION OF THE NOTICE U/S 148 OF THE ACT, DATED 29/06/2021 (DIGITALLY SIGNED ON 30/06/2021) BEARING DIN NO ITBA/AST/S/148/2021-22/1033843923(1), ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE - A.B) STAY THE OPERATION OF THE NOTICE U/S 148A(B) OF THE ACT, 23/05/2022 NO ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1043117346(1), ISSUED BY 2015-16 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE A1.C) STAY THE OPERATION OF THE ORDER U/S 148A(D) OF THE ACT, 27/07/2022, ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1044152103(1) ISSUED BY 2015-16 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE A2.D) STAY THE OPERATION OF THE NOTICE U/S 148 OF THE ACT 27/07/2022 ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1043981859(1) ISSUED BY 2015-16 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE A3.E) STAY THE OPERATION OF THE INTIMATION LETTER DATED
28/07/2022 FOR THE NOTICE U/S 148 OF THE ACT ITBA/AST/S/91/2022- 23/1044211550(1) ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 MARKED AS ANNEXURE - A4.F) STAY THE OPERATION OF THE ORDER PASSED U/S 147 R.W.S 144, 144B 08/05/23023 ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1052661214(1) ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE A5.G) STAY THE OPERATION OF THE PENALTY NOTICE U/S 274 R.W.S 270A OF THE ACT DATED 08/05/2023 BEARING DIN NO.ITBA/PNL/S/270A/2023-24/1052661371(1) BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE - A6.H) STAY THE OPERATION OF THE PENALTY ORDER U/S 271(1)(B) OF THE ACT DATED 01/03/2024 BEARING DIN NO. ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(B)/2023-24/1061851200(1) BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE - A7.I) STAY THE OPERATION OF THE PENALTY ORDER U/S 271(1)(C) OF THE ACT DATED 07/03/2024 BEARING DIN NO. ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(C)/2023-24/1062176267(1) NO.3 ANNEXURE - A8.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B-GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is aggrieved by the Notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [for short, the Act’] and other order/notices1. The details of the impugned Show Cause Notice and the subsequent Order/Notices are as follows: Sl. No. Notices/ Orders Date Provisions of Income Tax Act, 1961 Annexures
29.06.2021
Show Cause 23.05.2022 148A[b] A1
Order 148A[d] A2
Intimation letter for under Section 148 of the Act 28.07.2022 - A4
1 The petitioner has challenged the validity of Section 147A of the Act. However, the petitioner is restricting the petition for redressal of its grievance with the impugned notices/order.
Re- assessment Order 147 r/w/s 144, 144B A5
r/w/s. A6
Order 01.03.2024 271(1)(b) A7
Order 07.03.2024 A8
The impugned Show Cause Notice and the subsequent Order/ Notice are for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The question for consideration is whether the Notice under Section 148 of the Act for this Assessment Year after 01.04.2021 could be sustained in view of the concession made by the Revenue with the Apex Court in the ‘Union of India and Others v. Rajeev Bansal’2.
There is also the fact that enquiry under Section 148A of the Act is after the issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Act, but this aspect will not be germane for the assessment year 2015-16. Insofar as this assessment year the question of Notice under Section 148 of the Act being issued after 01.04.2021
2 [2024] SCC Online SC 2693
has come up for consideration before a Division Bench of this Court in ‘Income Tax Officer, Ward- 6[3][1] and Others v. Venkatala Iyappa Rajanna’3. The Division Bench, referring to the afore decision of the Apex Court, has opined that in view of the concession made by the Revenue, the reassessment proceedings commenced with the Notices under Section 148 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 after 01.04.2021 must be dropped.
Crucially, in the present case, the Notices under Section 148 of the IT Act are issued on 29.06.2021 and 27.07.2022. Therefore, the afore decision must be applied, and because the petition is being disposed of based on this decision, it must be observed that the issues canvassed otherwise by the petitioner is not examined and are left open. Hence the following:
3 2025 SCC OnLine Kar 25214
ORDER
The writ petition is allowed quashing the following subject to the observation as aforesaid. Sl. No. Notices/ Orders Date Provisions of Income Tax Act, 1961 Annexures
29.06.2021
Show Cause 23.05.2022 148A[b] A1
Order 148A[d] A2
Intimation letter for under Section 148 of the Act 28.07.2022 - A4
Re- assessment Order 147 r/w/s 144, 144B A5
r/w/s. A6
Order 01.03.2024 271(1)(b) A7
Order 07.03.2024 A8
Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
More judgments on Section 148
- Bha Associates Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs ACIT, Central Circle- 29, New DelhiITA 5208/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: Disposed6 Nov 2026AY 2015-16
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Jack And Jill vs. The Union Of INDIA And OrsGauhati · 5 Nov 2026
- Ms Akher Ali vs. The Union Of INDIAGauhati · 5 Nov 2026
- Paonta Hp Centre vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 5 Nov 2026
- M/S Multitech Agro INDIA (Opc) PVT LTD vs. The State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 5 Nov 2026
- Gopa Satya Madhava Subbarao vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 5 Nov 2026