THE AYIROOPPARA FARMERS SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

PDF · subscribers
WP(C)/35922/2017HC KeralaKLHC01083867201710 November 2017Author: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR4 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The provided text is an excerpt from a High Court judgment and does not contain the findings or decisions of the Tribunal. Therefore, it is not possible to state what the Tribunal decided, the reasoning behind its decision, or the ratio decidendi. No operative directions or issues left undecided are recorded in this excerpt.

What were the facts?

The petitioner, Ayirooppara Farmers Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala challenging an order passed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1), and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The assessment year(s) are not explicitly stated in the provided text. The nature of the order or action under challenge is not detailed, nor is the amount in dispute. The procedural history leading to this writ petition is not elaborated upon in the given excerpt.

What were the issues?

The provided text does not contain the specific issues that the Tribunal had to decide, nor does it detail the arguments presented by the assessee (petitioner) or the revenue (respondents). Therefore, it is not possible to frame the questions of law or mixed law and fact, or to list the contentions and authorities relied upon by each side.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017/19TH KARTHIKA, 1939 WP(C).No. 35922 of 2017 (M) ---------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------- THE AYIROOPPARA FARMERS SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD.no.2154, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, POTHENCODE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695584.

BY ADVS.SRI.V.G.ARUN SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR SRI.JAIBY PAUL SRI.ARJUN RAGHAVAN SRI.ADITHYA RAJEEV RESPONDENTS: -------------- 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2(1), OFFICE OF THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-2, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695003.

2.

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695003.

R1& R2 BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-11- 2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 35922 of 2017 (M) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------- EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 03.03.2015, ISSUED BY THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2014-2015 DATED 29.12.2016.

EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 29.12.2016.

EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FILED AGAINST EXT-P2 ASSESSMENT ORDER ALONG WITH COVERING LETTER DATED 09.01.2017.

EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 10.01.2017, FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN EXT-P4 APPEAL.

EXHIBIT P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECTIFICATION ORDER NO.AAAAA8288K/W-2(1)/ TVM/2017-18 DATED 22.08.2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.AAAAA8288K/W-2(1)/TVM/2017-18 DATED 14.09.2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P8 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.AAAAA8288K/W-2(1)/TVM/2017-18 DATED 30.10.2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ;NIL ----------------------- TRUE COPY P.S TO JUDGE AL/-

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J. ................................................................... W.P.(C).No.35922 Of 2017 ..................................................................... Dated this the 10th day of November, 2017 J U D G M E N T Against Ext.P2 assessment order under the Income Tax Act, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P4 appeal together with Ext.P5 stay petition before the 2nd respondent. It is the case of the petitioner that even prior to considering the stay petition, recovery steps are taken by the respondents against the petitioner for recovery of the amounts confirmed by Ext.P2 assessment order. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also the learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petition with the following directions: 1. The 2nd respondent shall consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 stay petition within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of

W.P.(C).No.35922 Of 2017

this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. 2. Recovery steps for recovery of amounts confirmed against petitioner by Ext.P2 assessment order shall be kept in abeyance till orders are passed by the 2nd respondent as directed above and communicated to the petitioner. 3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgement, together with a copy of the writ petition before the 2rd respondent for further action. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR

JUDGE mns/10.11.17

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →