MAHIPAL SOLAR SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JODHPUR-1
What did the High Court hold?
The Court noted that assessment orders had been passed after the writ petitions were filed, and appeals had been preferred against these orders. The counsel for the petitioners submitted that it would be more appropriate for the petitioners to raise all their permissible objections in the pending appeals. Consequently, the Court disposed of the writ petitions as withdrawn, granting the petitioners liberty to raise all permissible objections in the appeals filed against the final assessment orders. The stay applications were also disposed of.
What were the facts?
The petitioners, Mahipal Solar Solutions Pvt. Ltd. and Naveen Mahipal, filed writ petitions before the Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur. The petitions challenged certain actions or orders by the Income Tax Department. During the pendency of these writ petitions, assessment orders were passed against the petitioners. Subsequently, the petitioners preferred appeals against these final assessment orders. The counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be better advised to raise all their objections in the pending appeals.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the writ petitions are maintainable given that assessment orders have been passed and appeals have been preferred against them. Assessee's Contention: The assessee's counsel submitted that the petitioners would be better advised to raise all permissible objections in the pending appeals filed against the final assessment orders. The judgment does not record any specific arguments from the revenue's side regarding the maintainability of the writ petitions.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Order 13/07/2022 In view of the fact that the assessment orders have been passed after the writ petitions came to be filed and appeals have been preferred there against, learned counsel Mr. Mathur submits
(2 of 2) [CW-12839/2021] that the petitioners would be better advised to raise all the permissible objections in the pending appeals. Hence, the writ petitions are disposed of as withdrawn giving the petitioners liberty to raise all the permissible objections in the appeals filed against the final assessment orders. The stay applications are also disposed of. (KULDEEP MATHUR),J (SANDEEP MEHTA),J 24,25-Jayesh/Ravi-
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shree Hanumant Steel Traders vs. Assistant CommissionerChhattisgarh · 1 Nov 2026
- V3 Enterprises PVT LTD vs. The State Of ApAndhra Pradesh · 1 Nov 2026
- Zenith Metaplast(P) Limited vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 1 Nov 2026
- Susmita Das vs. The Principal Commissioner CGST And Central Excise , Bhubaneswar Commissionerate,KhurdaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Saroj Kumar Mahanandia vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026