HARRISONS MALAYALAM LTD, vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,EKM
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court of Kerala held that the issue raised in the Income Tax Appeal is covered against the assessee by the decision in Popular Vehicles and Services Pvt. Ltd., CIT, [2018] 406 ITR 150 (Ker.). Consequently, the questions of law are answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue. The appeal is rejected. The specific findings on the substantive issues that led to the ITAT order are not detailed, as the High Court's decision is based solely on the applicability of the precedent. No issues were expressly left undecided.
What were the facts?
This Income Tax Appeal (ITA No. 343 of 2010) was filed by Harrisons Malayalam Ltd. against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Cochin Bench, dated September 24, 2007. The appeal was filed before the High Court of Kerala. The respondent in the appeal is the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1 (I), Ernakulam. The judgment does not specify the assessment year(s) or the amount in dispute. The procedural history leading to this appeal is not detailed in the provided text.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the issue raised in the appeal is covered against the assessee by the decision in Popular Vehicles and Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT [2018] 406 ITR 150 (Ker.)? (Question of law) Assessee's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific contentions made by the assessee. The appeal is decided based on a precedent. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue would likely argue that the issue is covered by the aforementioned precedent, supporting the decision of the lower authorities. The judgment does not explicitly state the Revenue's arguments but implies their stance through the reliance on the precedent.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Vinod Chandran, J. The issue raised in the above I.T.Appeal is covered against the assessee in Popular Vehicles and Services Pvt.Ltd., C.I.T., [2018] 406 ITR 150 (Ker.). Hence following the aforesaid decision, the questions of law are answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue. The I.T.Appeal would stand rejected. K.VINOD CHANDRAN JUDGE ASHOK MENON dkr JUDGE
ITA 343/2010 3 APPENDIX APPELLANT'S/(S) ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR 2003-04 ISSUED BY THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT TO THE APPELLANT DATED 30.03.2006. ANNEXURE B COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) TO THE APPELLANT DATED 06.11.2006. ANNEXURE C COPY OF THE TRIBUNAL ORDER DATED 24.09.2007 ISSUED TO THE APPELLANT.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026