INDU SUNILKUMAR vs. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court directed the second respondent, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), to dispose of the stay applications (Exts.P12 to P16) within a period of two months. Furthermore, the Court ordered that recovery proceedings pursuant to the impugned assessment orders shall be kept in abeyance until the disposal of these stay applications. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions. No specific finding was made on the merits of the assessment orders or the stay applications themselves, as the Court's intervention was procedural.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Smt. Indu Sunilkumar, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala challenging a series of notices (Ext.P18 series). These notices were issued pursuant to Assessment Orders (Exts.P1 to P5) passed under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner had filed appeals against these assessment orders before the second respondent, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), and also filed stay applications (Exts.P12 to P16) in support of these appeals. The writ petition sought a direction for the disposal of these stay applications.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the High Court should direct the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to dispose of the pending stay applications filed by the petitioner? The petitioner's contention, implied by filing the writ petition, is that the stay applications are pending and require adjudication. The revenue's contention is not recorded in the judgment. The petitioner seeks a direction for the expeditious disposal of the stay applications filed against the assessment orders.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner, aggrieved by Ext.P18 series of notices, approached this Court. The petitioner, as against Exts.P1 to P5 Assessment Orders under the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed Exts.P6 to P10 appeals before the second respondent. The petitioner also filed Exts.P12 to P16 stay applications. In view of the above, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to dispose Exts.P12 to P16 stay applications within a period of two months. Till then, recovery proceedings pursuant to the impugned orders in the above appeals shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE ln
WP(C).No.3793/2019 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 AOF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2003-04. EXHIBIT P2 AOF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2004-05. EXHIBIT P3 AOF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2005-06. EXHIBIT P4 AOF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2007-08. EXHIBIT P5 AOF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2009-10. EXHIBIT P6 AOF THE APPEAL IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER WITHOUT ANNEXURES FOR THE YEAR 2003-04. EXHIBIT P7 AOF THE APPEAL IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER WITHOUT ANNEXURES FOR THE YEAR 2004-05. EXHIBIT P8 AOF THE APPEAL IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER WITHOUT ANNEXURES FOR THE YEAR 2005-06. EXHIBIT P9 AOF THE APPEAL IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER WITHOUT ANNEXURES FOR THE YEAR 2007-08. EXHIBIT P10 AOF THE APPEALS IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER WITHOUT ANNEXURES FOR THE YEAR 2009-10. EXHIBIT P11 AOF THE JUDGMENT DATED 06.03.2015 IN WP(C) NO.7182 OF 2015. EXHIBIT P12 AOF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY DATED 31.10.2018 FOR THE YEAR 2003. 04. EXHIBIT P13 AOF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY DATED 31.10.2018 FOR THE YEAR 2004-05. WP(C).No.3793/2019 4 EXHIBIT P14 AOF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY DATED 31.10.2018 FOR THE YEAR 2005-06. EXHIBIT P15 AOF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY DATED 31.10.2018 FOR THE YEAR 2007-08. EXHIBIT P16 AOF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY DATED 31.10.2018 FOR THE YEAR 2009-10. EXHIBIT P17 AOF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 29.01.2019. EXHIBIT P18 AOF THE NOTICE PROPOSING RECOVERY AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE YEAR 2003-04. EXHIBIT P18 A AOF THE NOTICE PROPOSING RECOVERY AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE YEAR 2004-05. EXHIBIT P18 B AOF THE NOTICE PROPOSING RECOVERY AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE YEAR 2005-06. EXHIBIT P18 C AOF THE NOTICE PROPOSING RECOVERY AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE YEAR 2007-08. EXHIBIT P18 D AOF THE NOTICE PROPOSING RECOVERY AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE YEAR 2009-10. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL. //// P.A.TO JUDGE
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Noore Manpower Services vs. Commissioner Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 2 Nov 2026
- Maa Bhawani Minrals vs. Commissioner Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S. Nourangi Paints vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- Basant Kumar Gupta vs. Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S Swapnashiyana Homes Developers Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026