SANJAY SINGHAL vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner's grievance did not survive. This conclusion was based on the submission made by the Revenue that the reassessment proceedings for the assessment years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023 had been completed. The Revenue further clarified that no additions were made during these completed proceedings. As the primary reason for filing the writ petitions was the challenge to the reassessment notices and the potential for additions, the completion of these proceedings without any adverse findings rendered the petitions infructuous. The Court, therefore, disposed of the writ petitions and all pending applications.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Sanjay Singhal, filed two writ petitions before the Delhi High Court under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. These petitions challenged notices for reassessment concerning assessment years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023. The Revenue informed the Court that reassessment proceedings for both assessment years have been completed. Crucially, the Revenue stated that no additions were made during these completed reassessment proceedings. Consequently, the petitioner's grievance, which was the basis for filing the writ petitions, was no longer extant.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the petitioner's grievance survives in light of the completed reassessment proceedings with no additions, as per Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Assessee's Contention: The petitioner filed the writ petitions challenging the notices issued under Section 148. The underlying grievance was the initiation of reassessment proceedings. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue stated that reassessment proceedings for the assessment years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023 have been completed. Furthermore, the Revenue confirmed that no additions were made during these completed proceedings. This submission effectively addresses and resolves the petitioner's initial grievance.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
O R D E R % 17.03.2025
The petitioner has filed the present petitions under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the Revenue informs this Court that pursuant to the said notices re-assessment in respect of the assessment years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023 have been completed and there have been no additions.
In view of the above, it is clear that the petitioner’s grievance does not This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 20:12:39
survive.
The petitions are, accordingly, disposed of. All pending applications are also disposed of. VIBHU BAKHRU, J TEJAS KARIA, J MARCH 17, 2025 RK Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 20:12:39
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Sharma vs. Union Of INDIA Rep Thr The Intelligence Officer, Directorate General Of GST Intelligence (Dggi)Jharkhand · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026