M/S. TAMIL NADU INDUSTRIAL D vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER O
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Electronics Corporation of India Vs. Union of India reported in (2011) 332 ITR 0058, agreed with the substantial questions of law raised by the assessee. The Court found that the Supreme Court had recalled directions requiring approval from the Committee on Disputes and remitted appeals for adjudication on merits. Consequently, the High Court set aside the impugned order of the ITAT dated 12.05.2009 in ITA.No.1181/Mds/2008 for Assessment Year 2003-2004. The appeal was remanded back to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” Bench, Chennai, for fresh adjudication on merits. No costs were awarded. The specific finding on each question of law is implicitly addressed by the setting aside and remand, based on the precedent cited.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corporation Limited, a State Government Corporation, filed its Return of Income for Assessment Year 2003-2004 showing 'Nil' income. The assessment was completed by the Assessing Officer on 23.11.2005. The Commissioner of Income Tax set aside this order and directed the Assessing Officer to recompute book profits under Section 115JB and under normal provisions, and to determine loss and absorbed depreciation for subsequent years. The assessee appealed this order to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), and the Revenue filed a cross-objection. The ITAT, by its order dated 12.05.2009, dismissed both the appeal and the cross-objection, holding that neither party had obtained necessary permission from the Committee on Disputes. The assessee then filed the present appeal before the High Court against the ITAT's order.
What were the issues?
The High Court had to decide the following substantial questions of law: 1. Whether the Tribunal was justified in not adjudicating the assessee's appeal (ITA.No.1181/Mds/2008 for AY 2003-04) in its consolidated order dated 12.05.2009. 2. Whether the Tribunal was justified in dismissing the appeal for not obtaining permission from the Committee on Disputes. 3. Whether the Tribunal was justified in rejecting the Miscellaneous Application to recall its order dated 12.05.2009, which dismissed the assessee's appeal. 4. Whether the Tribunal ought to have recalled its earlier order based on the Supreme Court decision in Electronics Corporation of India vs. Union of India. Assessee's Contentions: The assessee argued that the Tribunal was not justified in dismissing the appeal for want of permission from the Committee on Disputes, citing the Supreme Court decision in Electronics Corporation of India vs. Union of India, which recalled similar directions. The assessee contended that the Tribunal should have adjudicated the appeal on merits or recalled its order. Revenue's Contentions: The Revenue relied on ONGC & Anr. Vs. CCE, which was considered in the Electronics Corporation of India case. The judgment does not explicitly record further contentions from the Revenue regarding the specific issues raised by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
T.C.A.No.825 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 12.11.2019 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN AND THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE T.C.A.No.825 of 2019 Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corporation Limited 19A, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. ... Appellant / Appellant Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Company Circle – III (1) Chennai – 600 034. ... Respondent / Respondent Prayer:- Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” Bench, Chennai dated 12th May, 2009 in ITA.No.1181/Mds/2008. For Appellant : Mr.Vikram Vijaya Raghavan for Mr.Subbaraya Aiyar Padmanabhan. For Respondent : Mr.M.Swaminathan & Ms.Pushpa Standing Counsel for Income Tax Dept. 1/6 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No.825 of 2019 JUDGMENT [Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J.] The
appellant-assessee
State
Government Corporation/Undertaking and its Return of Income for the Assessment Year 2003-2004, admitting 'Nil' income was picked up for scrutiny and notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act was issued and thereafter, assessment was completed by the Assessing Officer, vide order dated 23.11.2005. The Commissioner of Income Tax has set aside the said order with a further direction, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the book profits under Section 115JB of the Act for the impugned Assessment Year and also to do the computation under normal provisions on the basis of the directions and decisions given, and also directed him to determine the loss and absorbed depreciation for the subsequent years, in accordance with law. 2. The assessee, aggrieved by the said order, filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench, and a Cross Objection was preferred by the Revenue. The Appellate Tribunal vide impugned order dated 12.05.2009, dismissed both the appeal and the cross objection filed by the Assessee and Revenue respectively, holding that neither the Assessee nor the Revenue, have not obtained necessary permission from the Committee on Disputes, however, granted liberty to 2/6 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No.825 of 2019 them to move the Tribunal for recalling the order. 3. Aggrieved by the dismissal order, the State Government Corporation/Assessee is before this Court in this appeal. In the grounds of appeal memorandum, the assessee has raised the following substantial questions of law : 1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in not adjudicating the appeal filed by assessee in ITA.No.1181/Mds/2008 for the assessment year 2003-04 in its consolidated order dated 12th May 2009? 2. Even assuming that the assessee appeal in ITA.No.1181/Mds/2008 for the assessment year 2003-04 was included in the consolidated order dated 12th May 2009, whether the Tribunal was justified in dismissing the appeal for not obtaining the permission from Committee on Disputes to pursue the appeal? 3. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in rejecting the Miscellaneous Application to recall its order dated 12th May 2009 to specifically adjudicate the assessee appeal in ITA No.1181/Mds/2008 for the assessment year 2003-2004 holding that the said appeal also stood dismissed vide the consolidated order dated 12th May 2009? 4. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal ought to have recalled its earlier order dated 12th 3/6 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No.825 of 2019 May 2009 for the assessment year 2003-04 on the basis of the Hon'ble Supreme Court decision in the case of Electronics Corporation of India vs. Union of India [332 ITR 58 (SC)], wherein the orders of the Supreme Court in the cases of ONGC vs. CEE [(1992) 104 CTR (SC) 31 : 1995 Suppl.(4) SCC 541]; ONGC vs. CEE [(1994) 116 CTR (SC) 643 : 2004 (6) SCC 437]; ONGC vs. City & Industrial Development Corporation [2007 (7) SCC 39] were recalled? 4. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant-assessee as well as the Standing Counsel appearing for the Revenue, has drawn the attention of this Court to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Electronics Corporation of India Vs. Union of India & Ors reported in [(2011) 332 ITR 0058 :(2011) 238 CTR 0353 : (2011) 79 CCH 0419 ISCC], and would submit the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the above cited decision, had recalled the directions requiring the approval of Committee on Disputes, and as such, remitted the appeals back to the Tribunal for adjudication on merits. 5. The Revenue has placed reliance upon ONGC & Anr. Vs. CCE [1992 Supp (2) SCC 432] and the said decision was taken into consideration in the above cited decision, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, had recalled the directions passed in the following cases : i. ONGC vs. CCE (1992) 104 CTR (SC) 31 : 1995 Supp (4) SCC 541 4/6 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No.825 of 2019 dt. 11th Oct.1991. ii. ONGC vs. CCE (1994) 116 CTR (SC) 643 : (2004) 6 SCC 437, dt. 7th Jan. 1994. iii. ONGC vs. CCE (2007) 7 SCC 39, dt. 20th July 1994. 6. This Court has considered the rival submissions and also perused the materials placed before it. 7. In the light of the above cited decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, reported in [(2011) 332 ITR 0058], this Court is in agreement with the substantial questions of law raised in this appeal, and this appeal is allowed and the impugned order dated 12th May, 2009 in ITA.No.1181/Mds/2008, relating to the Assessment Year 2003-2004, is set aside and the appeal is remanded back to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” Bench, Chennai, for fresh adjudication. No costs. [M.S.N., J.,] [N.S.S., J]
12.11.2019 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order ds To: The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Company Circle – III (1) Chennai – 600 034. 5/6 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No.825 of 2019 M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J., and N.SESHASAYEE, J., ds T.C.A.No.825 of 2019 12.11.2019 6/6 http://www.judis.nic.in
More judgments on Section 115JB
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Braithwaite & Co. Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 1(1), KolkataITA 1076/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026