COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI.P.SATHYANARAYANAN

PDF · subscribers
TCA/818/2015HC Madras27 August 2019Bench: Hon`ble Mr Justice T. S. SIVAGNANAM4 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court dismissed the appeals filed by the Revenue. The dismissal was based on the Revenue's submission that it was not pursuing the appeals due to a low tax effect, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, which raised the monetary limit for appeals to the High Court to Rs. 1 Crore. The Court noted that the tax effect in these cases was below the threshold. Consequently, the substantial questions of law framed for admission were left open. The Revenue was granted liberty to mention the case for restoration if the tax effect was found to be above the threshold limit, allowing for a decision on merits. No costs were imposed.

What were the facts?

The Revenue, Commissioner of Income Tax, filed these appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order dated 21.09.2011 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chennai 'A' Bench. The appeals challenge the ITAT's decisions concerning assessment years 2000-01, 2003-04, 2004-05, and 1999-2000 to 2005-06. The appeals were admitted on substantial questions of law. However, the Revenue later submitted that it was not pursuing these appeals due to low tax effect, citing CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 which increased the monetary limit for appeals to the High Court to Rs. 1 Crore. The tax effect in these cases was stated to be below this threshold.

What were the issues?

The Tribunal had to decide the following substantial questions of law: 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in annulling the search assessments for the assessment years 2000-01, 2003-04 and 2004-05 made under Section 153C read with Section 153A of the Income Tax Act? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that a satisfaction note is to be recorded for the purpose of invoking Section 153C, especially when the assessing officer dealing with the assessment of the 'searched person' and the 'non-searched person' is one and the same? 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that a belated Return of Income filed under Section 153C read with Section 153A is an invalid return and cannot be acted upon for the purpose of making an assessment? 4. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in deleting the additions made by the assessing officer based on materials seized during search and information available subsequent to the issuance of notice? The Revenue contended that the ITAT erred in annulling search assessments and in its interpretation of Section 153C regarding satisfaction notes and the validity of belated returns. The Revenue also questioned the deletion of additions made based on seized materials. The judgment does not record specific arguments from the assessee.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260A,Section 153C,Section 153A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

TCA.Nos.818 to 827 of 2015 In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 27.08.2019 Coram : The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM and The Honourable Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN Tax Case Appeal Nos.818 to 827 of 2015 Commissioner of Income Tax, Central I, 108, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai - 600 034. ...Appellant Vs Shri P.Sathyanarayanan ...Respondent APPEALS under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the common order dated 21.09.2011 made in ITA.Nos.717 to 719 and 891 to 897/Mds/2008 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'A' Bench for the assessment years 2000-01, 2003-04, 2004-05 and 1999-2000 to 2005-06. For Appellant : Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar, SSC assisted by Ms.K.G.Usharani, SC For Respondent : Mr.G.Baskar COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment was delivered by T.S.Sivagnanam,J) We have heard Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel assisted by Ms.K.G.Usharani, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant – Revenue and Mr.G.Baskar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent - assessee. 1/4 http://www.judis.nic.in TCA.Nos.818 to 827 of 2015 2.These appeals, filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, are directed against the common order dated 21.09.2011 made in ITA.Nos.717 to 719 and 891 to 897/Mds/2008 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'A' Bench for the assessment years 2000-01, 2003- 04, 2004-05 and 1999-2000 to 2005-06. 3.TCA.Nos.818 to 820 of 2015 were admitted on 30.11.2015 on the following substantial questions of law : “1)Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law, in annulling the search assessments for the assessment years 2000-01, 2003-04 and 2004-05 made under Section 153C read with Section 153A of the Income Tax Act? 2)Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that satisfaction note is to be recorded for the purpose of invoking Section 153C especially when the assessing officer, who dealt with the assessment of 'searched person' and that of the other 'non-searched person' is one and the same?" 4.TCA.Nos.821 to 827 of 2015 were admitted on 30.11.2015 on the following substantial questions of law : “1)Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in in holding that the belated Return of Income filed under Section 153C read with Section 153A is an invalid return and the same cannot be acted upon for the purpose of make assessment? 2)Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the 2/4 http://www.judis.nic.in TCA.Nos.818 to 827 of 2015 case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in deleting the additions made by the assessing officer based on the materials seized during search and the information available subsequent to issuance of notice?" 5.The learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant submits that the above appeals are not pursued by the Revenue on account of the low tax effect in terms of Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.8.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. By the said Circular, the monetary limit for filing or pursuing an appeal before the High Court has been increased to Rs.1 Crore. It is further submitted that the tax effect in the respective cases is less than the threshold limit. 6. In the light of the said submissions, the above tax case appeals are dismissed on account of the low tax effect. The substantial questions of law framed are left open. In the event the tax effect in the respective cases is above the threshold limit fixed in the said circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court to restore the appeals to be heard and decided on merits. No costs. (T.S.S.J.) (V.B.S.J.) 27.08.2019 cse Speaking (or) Non Speaking Order Index : Yes (or) No 3/4 http://www.judis.nic.in TCA.Nos.818 to 827 of 2015 T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J. AND V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN,J. cse To The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'A' Bench. TCA.Nos.818 to 827 of 2015 27.08.2019 4/4 http://www.judis.nic.in

More judgments on Section 153C

All 9,619 judgments and leading authorities on Section 153C →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →