M/S.CORTEX ENTERPRISES vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

PDF · subscribers
TCA/8/2021HC Madras11 January 2021Bench: Hon`ble Mr Justice T. S. SIVAGNANAM6 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court noted that the assessee intended to avail the benefit of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (Act 3 of 2020). Given this development, the Court deemed it unnecessary to decide the substantial questions of law. The Court referred to the provisions of the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, which provides for the resolution of disputed tax matters pending at various appellate levels. The assessee was granted liberty to restore the appeal if the decision on their declaration under the VVS Scheme was not in their favour. The Court directed the assessee to file Form No. I and the Competent Authority to process the application expeditiously, preferably within six weeks. The Tax Case Appeal was disposed of with this liberty, leaving the substantial questions of law open. No costs were awarded.

What were the facts?

The assessee, M/s. Cortex Enterprises, Chennai, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, before the High Court of Judicature at Madras. The appeal challenged an order dated April 30, 2019, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai ('the Tribunal'), in ITA No. 3377/Chny/2018, pertaining to the assessment year 2011-12. The Revenue was represented by the Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward 1(5), Chennai. The appeal was filed raising substantial questions of law concerning reassessment proceedings, the scope of reassessment orders beyond reasons recorded under Section 148, and disallowance under Section 40A(3) for payments made under exceptional circumstances. The High Court heard arguments from both sides.

What were the issues?

The Tribunal had to decide three substantial questions of law: 1. Whether the reassessment proceedings for assessment year 2011-12 were valid. 2. Whether the reassessment order was justified beyond the reasons recorded under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. 3. Whether the disallowance under Section 40A(3) for a business payment made due to unavoidable or exceptional circumstances, as provided under Rule 6DD of the Income Tax Rules, was correct. The assessee contended that they intended to avail the benefit of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VVS Scheme) and were taking steps to file the necessary declaration. The Revenue was represented by its Senior Standing Counsel. The judgment does not record specific arguments from the Revenue on the substantial questions of law, other than accepting notice.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260A,Section 148,Section 40A(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

TCA.No.8 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 11.1.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA Tax Case Appeal No.8 of 2021 M/s.Cortex Enterprises, Chennai-4 ...Appellant Vs The Income Tax Officer, Non Corporate Ward 1(5), Chennai-34 ...Respondent APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 30.4.2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai made in I.T.A.No.3377/Chny/2018 for the assessment year 2011-12. For Appellant: Mr.P.Prithvi Chopda For Respondent : Mr.T.Ravikumar, SSC Judgment was delivered by

T.S.SIVAGNANAM

This appeal has been filed by the assessee under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for brevity) challenging the order 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.No.8 of 2021 dated 30.4.2019 made in I.T.A.No.3377/Chny/2018 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, 'B' Bench ('the Tribunal' for brevity) for the assessment year 2011-12. 2. The assessee has filed this appeal by raising the following substantial questions of law: “1. Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is correct in law to uphold the reassessment proceedings for the assessment year 2011-12 ? 2. Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is correct in law to uphold the reassessment order beyond the reasons recorded under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act ? and 3. Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is correct in law to uphold the disallowance under Section 40A(3) for the payment made in the course of business due to unavoidable circumstance falling under exceptional circumstance provided under Rule 6DD of the Income Tax Rules?” 3. We have heard Mr.P.Prithvi Chopda, learned counsel appearing for the appellant – assessee and Mr.T.Ravikumar, learned Senior 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.No.8 of 2021 Standing Counsel accepting notice for the respondent – Revenue. 4. The learned counsel for the appellant/assessee, on instructions, submitted that the appellant/assessee intends to avail the benefit of Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme ('VVS Scheme' for brevity) and in this regard, the assessee is taking steps to file the application/ declaration in Form No.I. 5. It may not be necessary for this Court to decide the substantial questions of law raised for consideration on account of certain subsequent developments. The Government of India enacted the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (Act 3 of 2020) to provide for resolution of disputed tax and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. The Act of the Parliament received the assent of the President on 17th March 2020 and published in the Gazette of India on 17th March 2020. 6 . In terms of the said Act, the assessee has been given an option to put an end to the tax disputes, which may be pending at different levels either before the First Appellate Authority or before the Tribunal or before the High Court or before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. Under Section 2(j) “disputed tax” has been defined. In terms of Section 3, where a declarant means a person, who files a declaration under Section 4 on or before the last date files a 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.No.8 of 2021 declaration to the designated authority in accordance with the provisions of Section 4 in respect of tax arrears, then, notwithstanding anything contained in the Income Tax Act or any other law for the time being in force, the amount payable by the declarant shall be determined in terms of Section 3(a-c) thereunder. 7. The First Proviso to Section 3 states that in case, where an Appeal or Writ Petition or Special Leave Petition is filed by the Income Tax authority on any issue before the Appellate Forum, the amount payable shall be one-half of the amount in the table stipulated in Section 3 calculated on such issue, in such a manner as may be prescribed. The Second Proviso deals with the cases, where the matter is before the Commissioner (Appeals) or before the Dispute Resolution Panel. The Third Proviso deals with cases, where the issue is pending before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The filing of the declaration is as per Section 4 of the Act and the particulars to be furnished are also mentioned in the Sub Sections of Section 4. Section 5 of the Act deals with the time and manner of the payment and Section 6 deals with Immunity from initiation of proceedings in respect of offence and imposition of penalty in certain cases. Section 9 of the Act deals with cases, where the Act 3 of 2020 will not be applicable. 8. As observed, the assessee is given liberty to restore this 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.No.8 of 2021 appeal in the event the ultimate decision to be taken on the declaration to be filed by the assessee under Section 4 of the said Act is not in favour of the assessee. If such a prayer is made, the Registry shall entertain the prayer without insisting upon any application to be filed for condonation of delay in restoration of the appeal and on such request made by the assessee by filing a miscellaneous petition for restoration, the Registry shall place such petition before the Division Bench for orders. 9. In the light of the above, we direct the appellant/assessee to file the Form No.I and the Competent Authority shall process the application/declaration in accordance with the Act and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six (6) weeks from the date on which the declaration is filed in the proper form. 10. The tax case appeal stands disposed of with the aforementioned liberty. Consequently, the substantial questions of law raised are left open. No costs. 11.1.2021 RS 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.No.8 of 2021 T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J AND R.N.MANJULA,J RS To 1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai. 2.The Income Tax Officer, Non Corporate Ward 1(5), Chennai-34. TCA.No.8 of 2021 11.1.2021 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

More judgments on Section 148

All 35,022 judgments and leading authorities on Section 148 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →