THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME vs. M/S.G.ABDUL RAHMAN AND CO.,

PDF · subscribers
TCA/790/2019HC Madras30 October 2019Bench: Hon`ble The ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE5 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court dismissed the Tax Case Appeal on the ground of tax effect, citing Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, which stipulates a monetary limit of Rs. 1 crore for filing appeals before the High Court. The Court noted that the tax effect in this case was less than this limit. However, the substantial questions of law framed were left open. The Revenue was granted liberty to mention the case for restoration if the tax effect is found to be above the prescribed limit, to be heard and decided on merits. The judgment did not decide the substantial questions of law on their merits.

What were the facts?

The Revenue, Commissioner of Income Tax – VIII, Chennai, filed a Tax Case Appeal against an order dated 24.07.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'D' Bench, for the assessment year 2004-05. The appeal was admitted on substantial questions of law concerning the validity of reassessment proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the Tribunal correctly dismissed the Revenue's appeal without deciding on merits. The Revenue's counsel submitted that the tax effect in this case was less than Rs. 1 crore, which, as per Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, is the monetary limit for filing an appeal before the High Court. Therefore, the appeal should be dismissed.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in dismissing the appeal filed by the revenue on the ground that it was a mere change of opinion, thereby questioning the validity of resorting to the provisions of Section 147/148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in not deciding the matter on merits and whether the notice issued under Section 148 was in time in accordance with explanation 2(c) of section 147, which clearly applies to the facts of this case? Assessee's Contentions: The judgment does not record any specific contentions made by the assessee, M/s. G. Abdul Rahman & Co. Revenue's Contentions: The Revenue contended that the tax effect in this case is less than Rs. 1 crore and is covered by Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, which sets the monetary limit for filing an appeal before the High Court at Rs. 1 crore. Therefore, the appeal should be dismissed.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 148

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

T.C.A.No.790 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 13.11.2019 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN T.C.A.No.790 of 2019 The Commissioner of Income Tax – VIII Chennai.

... Appellant Vs M/s.G.Abdul Rahman & Co., No.252C Abdl Hakeem Road, Melvisharam (PAN AAAFG5497P) ... Respondent PRAYER : Appeal under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “D” Bench, dated 24.07.2009 in ITA.No.167/Mds/2009. For Appellant :Mr.M.Swaminathan J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.KIRUBAKARAN, J) This Tax Case Appeal has been preferred by the Revenue against the order dated 24.07.2009 in ITA.No.167/Mds/2009. on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'D' Bench for the 1/5 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No.790 of 2019 assessment year 2004-05. 2.The appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law : “1.Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in dismissing the appeal filed by the revenue on the ground that this is a mere change of opinion of the assessing officer for resorting to the provisions of Section 147/148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is valid? 2.Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in not deciding the matter on merits and the notice was issued under Section 148 in time in accordance with explanation 2(c) of section 147 which clearly apply to the facts of this case?" 3.Mr.M.Swaminathan, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant would submit that the tax effect in this case is less than Rs.1 crore and is covered by Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Director, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, Delhi. As per the said circular, the monetary 2/5 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No.790 of 2019 limit to file an appeal before the High Court is fixed at Rs.1 crore. In this case, tax effect is less than Rs.1 crore and therefore, the case has to be dismissed. 4.This Court perused the circular dated 08.08.2019 and Paragraph No.2 of the said Circular, which prescribes monetary limit for filing appeal is usefully extracted as follows: 2.As a step towards further management of litigation, it has been decided by the Board that monetary limits for filing of appeals in income-tax cases be enhanced further through amendment in Para 3 of the Circular mentioned above and accordingly, the table for monetary limits specified in Para 3 of the Circular shall read as follows: S.No. Appeals / SLPs in Income-tax matters Monetary Limit (Rs.) 1. Before Appeallate Tribunal 50,00,000 2. Before High Court 1,00,00,000 3. Before Supreme Court 2,00,00,000 5.In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and also in view of the Circular 3/5 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No.790 of 2019 No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Director, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Delhi, the Tax Case Appeal is dismissed on account of tax effect. However, the substantial questions of law framed is left open. In the event the tax effect is above the limit fixed in the said circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court to restore the appeal to be heard and decided on merits. No costs. (NKKJ) (PVJ) 13.11.2019 sai To 1. The Commissioner of Income Tax – VIII Chennai. 2.Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'D' Bench, Chennai. 4/5 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No.790 of 2019 N.KIRUBAKARAN, J. and P.VELMURUGAN

, J.

sai T.C.A.No.790 of 2019 Dated : 13.11.2019 5/5 http://www.judis.nic.in

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →