PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF vs. SHRI A.RAMALINGAM
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the Tax Case Appeals on the ground of tax effect, citing Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019. This circular enhances the monetary limit for filing appeals before the High Court to Rs.1 crore. The Court noted that the tax effect in these appeals was less than this prescribed limit. However, the substantial questions of law framed at the time of admission were left open. The Revenue was granted liberty to mention the case before the Court to restore the appeals for hearing and decision on merits if the tax effect is found to be above the limit fixed in the circular. No costs were imposed, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.
What were the facts?
These three Tax Case Appeals (TCA.Nos.746 to 748 of 2018) were filed by the Revenue (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 2, Coimbatore) against orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chennai 'A' Bench, dated 27.09.2017. TCA.No.746 of 2018 pertains to assessment year 2006-07, arising from ITA.Nos.216/Mds/2013. TCA.No.747 of 2018 pertains to assessment year 2011-12, arising from ITA.Nos.591/Mds/2016. TCA.No.748 of 2018 pertains to assessment year 2006-07, arising from ITA.Nos.1315/Mds/2016. The ITAT had confirmed the lower authority's order in ITA.Nos.216/Mds/2013 and 1315/Mds/2016, and partly allowed ITA.No.591/Mds/2016. The appeals were admitted on substantial questions of law.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the ITAT was right in holding that the addition of Rs.2.38 Crores was made on the basis of presumption and surmise, brushing aside concrete evidence in the form of a stamp receipt on the impugned transaction of sale of land? (Question of law, concerning the assessment of income). 2. Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the oral statement, allegedly recorded from the assessee or their sisters, cannot override the statement contained in the registered release deed and affidavit, ignoring the terms of the assessee's father's last WILL to distribute properties among children? (Question of law, concerning the interpretation of documents and distribution of property). Assessee's contentions: Not recorded in the judgment. Revenue's contentions: The tax effect in these cases is less than Rs.1 crore. As per Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the CBDT, the monetary limit for filing an appeal before the High Court is Rs.1 crore. Therefore, these appeals should be dismissed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
T.C.A.Nos.746 to 748 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 16.12.2019 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN T.C.A.Nos.746 to 748 of 2018 and C.M.P.Nos.17026 & 17027 of 2018 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 2 No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore. ... Appellant (in all the appeals) Vs Shri.A.Ramalingam, L/H Shri.R.Ravanan, 279, 279/1, Sathy Main Road, Erode – 638 003. PAN: AGGPR 7344 N ... Respondent in TCA.Nos.746 & 748 of 2019 Shri R.Ravanan, 279/2, Sathy Road, Erode – 638 003. PAN: AGGPR 6530 G ... Respondent in TCA.No.747 of 2019 PRAYER in TCA.746 of 2019 : Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate 1/8 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.Nos.746 to 748 of 2018 Tribunal, Madras “A” Bench, dated 27.09.2017 passed in ITA.Nos.216/Mds/2013. PRAYER in TCA.747 of 2019 : Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “A” Bench, dated 27.09.2017 passed in ITA.Nos.591/Mds/2016. PRAYER in TCA.748 of 2019 : Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “A” Bench, dated 27.09.2017 passed in ITA.Nos.1315/Mds/2016. For Appellant :Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar (in all the appeals) Senior standing counsel For Respondent :Mr.A.S.Sriraman (in all the appeals) C O M M O N J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.KIRUBAKARAN, J) T.C.A.No.746 of 2018 has been preferred by the Revenue against the order dated 27.09.2017 passed in ITA.Nos.216/Mds/2013 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'A' Bench for the assessment year 2006-07. 2/8 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.Nos.746 to 748 of 2018 2.T.C.A.No.747 of 2018 has been preferred by the Revenue against the order dated 27.09.2017 passed in ITA.Nos.591/Mds/2016 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'A' Bench for the assessment year 2011-12. 3.T.C.A.No.748 of 2018 has been preferred by the Revenue against the order dated 27.09.2017 passed in ITA.Nos.1315/Mds/2016 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'A' Bench for the assessment year 2006-07. 4.The impugned orders were filed by the Assessee before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal has confirmed the order of the lower authority by allowing I.T.A.Nos.216/Mds/2013 & 1315/Mds/2016 and partly allowing I.T.A.No.591/Mds/2016. 5.T.C.A.Nos.746 & 748 of 2018 is admitted on the following substantial question of law : “Whether the ITAT was right in holding that the addition of Rs.2.38 Crores was made on the basis of presumption and surmise brushing aside the concrete evidence in the form of stamp receipt on the impugned transaction of sale 3/8 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.Nos.746 to 748 of 2018 of land?" 6.T.C.A.No.747 of 2018 is admitted on the following substantial question of law : “Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the oral statement said to be recorded from the assessee or from sisters of the assessee cannot override the statement contained in the registered release deed and affidavit ignoring the terms of assessee's father last WILL to distribute the properties among the children ?" 7.Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant would submit that the tax effect in these cases are less than Rs.1 crore and is covered by Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Director, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, Delhi. As per the said circular, the monetary limit to file an appeal before the High Court is fixed at Rs.1 crore. In these cases, tax effect is less than Rs.1 crore and therefore, these cases have to be dismissed. 4/8 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.Nos.746 to 748 of 2018 8.This Court perused the circular dated 08.08.2019 and Paragraph No.2 of the said Circular, which prescribes monetary limit for filing appeal is usefully extracted as follows: 2.As a step towards further management of litigation, it has been decided by the Board that monetary limits for filing of appeals in income-tax cases be enhanced further through amendment in Para 3 of the Circular mentioned above and accordingly, the table for monetary limits specified in Para 3 of the Circular shall read as follows: S.No. Appeals / SLPs in Income- tax matters Monetary Limit (Rs.) 1. Before Appeallate Tribunal 50,00,000 2. Before High Court 1,00,00,000 3. Before Supreme Court 2,00,00,000 9.In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and also in view of the Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Director, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Delhi, these Tax Case Appeals are dismissed on account of tax effect. However, the substantial question of law framed is left open. In the event the tax effect is above the limit fixed in the said 5/8 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.Nos.746 to 748 of 2018 circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court to restore the appeals to be heard and decided on merits. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. (NKKJ) (PVJ) 16.12.2019 sai 6/8 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.Nos.746 to 748 of 2018 To 1.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 2 No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore. 2.Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'A' Bench, Chennai. 7/8 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.Nos.746 to 748 of 2018 N.KIRUBAKARAN, J. and P.VELMURUGAN
, J.
sai T.C.A.Nos.746 to 748 of 2018 Dated : 16.12.2019 8/8 http://www.judis.nic.in
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026