M/S.BHIMAAS ENGINEERING AND vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF I

PDF · subscribers
TCA/66/2020HC Madras28 October 2020Bench: Hon`ble Mr Justice T. S. SIVAGNANAM6 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court noted that the substantial question of law did not require a decision due to subsequent developments, specifically the enactment of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The Court acknowledged the assessee's intention to avail the VVS Scheme. The Court directed the assessee to file Form No.I by November 19, 2020, and instructed the Competent Authority to process the application expeditiously, preferably within six weeks of filing. The appeal was disposed of with the liberty for the assessee to restore it if the decision on the VVS declaration was not in their favor. Consequently, the substantial question of law was left open. No costs were awarded.

What were the facts?

The assessee, M/s.Bhimaas Engineering & Projects Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Madras against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated March 21, 2019. The appeal pertained to the assessment year 2015-16. The Revenue was represented by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax. The procedural history involved the ITAT passing an order which the assessee sought to challenge before the High Court under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The amount in dispute was not explicitly stated.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in disallowing the sales commission paid? (Question of law) The assessee's counsel, on instructions, submitted that the assessee intended to avail the benefit of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VVS Scheme) and was taking steps to file the necessary declaration. The Revenue's contentions were not recorded as the appeal was disposed of based on the assessee's intention to opt for the VVS Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

T.C.A.No.66 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28.10.2020 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN Tax Case Appeal No.66 of 2020

M/s.Bhimaas Engineering & Projects Pvt. Ltd., Chennai-34 ...Appellant Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle 1(2), Chennai–34. ...Respondent APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench, Chennai, dated 21.3.2019 made in I.T.A.No.2907/Chny/2018 for the assessment year 2015-16. For Appellant : Mr.G.Baskar For Respondent : Mr.T.Ravikumar, SSC Judgment was delivered by

T.S.SIVAGNANAM

This appeal has been filed by the assessee under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for brevity) challenging the order dated 21.3.2019 made in I.T.A.No.2907/Chny/2018 on the file of the 1/6 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No.66 of 2020 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, 'C' Bench ('the Tribunal' for brevity) for the assessment year 2015-16. 2. The assessee preferred this appeal on the following substantial question of law: “Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in disallowing the sales commission paid ?” 3. We have heard Mr.G.Baskar, learned counsel appearing for the appellant/assessee and Mr.T.Ravikumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent/Revenue. 4. The learned counsel for the appellant/assessee, on instructions, submits that the appellant/assessee intends to avail the benefit of Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme ('VVS Scheme' for brevity) and in this regard, the assessee is taking steps to file the application/ declaration in Form No.I. 5. It may not be necessary for this Court to decide the substantial question of law raised for consideration on account of certain subsequent developments. The Government of India enacted the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (Act 3 of 2020) to provide for resolution of disputed tax and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. The Act of the Parliament received the assent of the 2/6 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No.66 of 2020 President on 17th March 2020 and published in the Gazette of India on 17th March 2020. 6. In terms of the said Act, the assessee has been given an option to put an end to the tax disputes, which may be pending at different levels either before the First Appellate Authority or before the Tribunal or before the High Court or before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. Under Section 2(j) “disputed tax” has been defined. In terms of Section 3, where a declarant means a person, who files a declaration under Section 4 on or before the last date files a declaration to the designated authority in accordance with the provisions of Section 4 in respect of tax arrears, then, notwithstanding anything contained in the Income Tax Act or any other law for the time being in force, the amount payable by the declarant shall be determined in terms of Section 3(a-c) thereunder. 7. The First Proviso to Section 3 states that in case, where an appeal or writ petition or special leave petition is filed by the Income Tax authority on any issue before the Appellate Forum, the amount payable shall be one-half of the amount in the table stipulated in Section 3 calculated on such issue, in such a manner as may be prescribed. The Second Proviso deals with the cases, where the matter is before the Commissioner (Appeals) or before the Dispute Resolution 3/6 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No.66 of 2020 Panel. The Third Proviso deals with cases, where the issue is pending before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The filing of the declaration is as per Section 4 of the Act and the particulars to be furnished are also mentioned in the Sub-Sections of Section 4. Section 5 of the Act deals with the time and manner of the payment and Section 6 deals with immunity from initiation of proceedings in respect of offence and imposition of penalty in certain cases. Section 9 of the Act deals with cases, where the Act 3 of 2020 will not be applicable. 8. As observed, the assessee is given liberty to restore this appeal in the event the ultimate decision to be taken on the declaration to be filed by the assessee under Section 4 of the said Act is not in favour of the assessee. If such a prayer is made, the Registry shall entertain the prayer without insisting upon any application to be filed for condonation of delay in restoration of the appeal and on such request made by the assessee by filing a miscellaneous petition for restoration, the Registry shall place such petition before the Division Bench for orders. 9. In the light of the above, we direct the appellant/assessee to file Form No.I on or before 19.11.2020 and the Competent Authority shall process the application/declaration in accordance with the Act and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible preferably within a 4/6 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No.66 of 2020 period of six (6) weeks from the date, on which, the declaration is filed in the proper form. 10. With this direction, the tax case appeal stands disposed of with the aforementioned liberty and Consequently, the substantial question of law are left open. No costs. 28.10.2020 To 1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Chennai. 2.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle 1(2), Chennai–34. RS 5/6 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No.66 of 2020 T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J AND V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN,J RS T.C.A.No.66 of 2020 28.10.2020 6/6 http://www.judis.nic.in

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →