COMMISSIOINER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S EASTMAN EXPORTS GLOBAL

PDF · subscribers
TCA/494/2015HC Madras18 June 2020Bench: Hon`ble Mr Justice T. S. SIVAGNANAM4 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. The dismissal was based on the Revenue's submission that the appeal was not being pursued due to a low tax effect, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019. The Court noted that the monetary limit for filing or pursuing appeals before the High Court had been increased to Rs. 1 Crore by this circular, and the tax effect in the present case was below this limit. Consequently, the substantial question of law framed at the time of admission was left open. The Revenue was granted liberty to seek restoration of the appeal if the tax effect was found to be above the threshold limit, to be heard and decided on merits. No costs were awarded.

What were the facts?

The Revenue, Commissioner of Income Tax, filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The ITAT's order, dated January 9, 2015, in ITA No. 773/Mds/2014, pertained to the assessment year 2009-10. The appeal challenged the ITAT's decision that proceeds realized by the assessee, M/s. Eastman Exports Global Clothing (P) Ltd., from the sale of Certified Emission Reduction (CER) credits, earned through its wind energy operations under the Clean Development Mechanism, constituted a capital receipt and were therefore not taxable. The High Court admitted the appeal on a substantial question of law.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the proceeds realized by the assessee on sale of Certified Emission Reduction Credit, which the assessee had earned on the Clean Development Mechanism in its wind energy operations, is a capital receipt and not taxable? (Question of law) Assessee's Contentions: Not recorded in the judgment. Revenue's Contentions: The Revenue's appeal was not pursued due to low tax effect, citing CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, which increased the monetary limit for pursuing appeals before the High Court to Rs. 1 Crore. The tax effect in this case was below this threshold.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

TCA.No.494 of 2015 In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 18.06.2020 Coram : The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM and The Honourable Mrs.Justice PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA Tax Case Appeal No.494 of 2015 Commissioner of Income Tax, No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore. ...Appellant -vs- M/s.Eastman Exports Global Clothing (P) Ltd., No.10-12, Kumar Nagar, South 2nd Street, Tirupur-641 003. PAN: AAC CC 0952 E ...Respondent APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 09.01.2015 made in I.T.A.No.773/Mds/2014 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'D' Bench, Chennai for the assessment year 2009-10. For Appellant : Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar, Senior Standing Counsel & Ms.G.Usha Rani, Standing Counsel For Respondent : Mr.R.Senniappan 1/4 http://www.judis.nic.in TCA.No.494 of 2015 Judgment was delivered by

T.S.Sivagnanam, J.

We have heard Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel and Ms.K.G.Usha Rani, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant- Revenue and Mr.R.Senniappan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-assessee. 2. This appeal, filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is directed against the order dated 09.01.2015, made in I.T.A.No.773/Mds/2014 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'D' Bench, Chennai for the assessment year 2009-10. 3. The appeal was admitted on 08.07.2015 on the following substantial question of law:- “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the proceeds realized by the assessee on sale of Certified Emission Reduction Credit, which the assessee had earned on the Clean Development Mechanism in its wind energy operations, is a capital receipt and not taxable?” 2/4 http://www.judis.nic.in TCA.No.494 of 2015 4. The learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant submits that the above appeal is not pursued by the Revenue on account of the low tax effect in terms of Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.8.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. By the said Circular, the monetary limit for filing or pursuing an appeal before the High Court has been increased to Rs.1 Crore. It is further submitted that the tax effect in this case is less than the threshold limit. 5. In the light of the said submissions, the above tax case appeal is dismissed on account of the low tax effect. The substantial question of law framed is left open. In the event the tax effect is above the threshold limit fixed in the said circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court to restore the appeal to be heard and decided on merits. No costs. (T.S.S., J.) (P.S.N., J.) 18.06.2020 Internet: Yes To The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'D' Bench. abr 3/4 http://www.judis.nic.in TCA.No.494 of 2015 T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J AND PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J. abr TCA.No.494 of 2015 18.06.2020 4/4 http://www.judis.nic.in

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →