COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SKM SHREE SHIVKUMAR
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. The primary reason for dismissal was the issuance of CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated August 8, 2019. This circular stipulates that appeals shall not be filed or pursued by the Department before the High Court if the tax effect does not exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). The Court noted that in the present case, the tax effect was less than this stipulated monetary limit. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The Court explicitly stated that the substantial questions of law were kept open for determination in appropriate cases. No costs were awarded.
What were the facts?
The Revenue, Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle I, Erode, filed a Tax Case Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), 'B' Bench, Chennai, dated July 17, 2014. This order was in relation to ITA No.1965/Mds/2011 for the Assessment Year 2008-2009. The appeal concerned the applicability of certain provisions of the Income Tax Act to transactions involving the assessee, SKM Shree Shivkumar, and a company, M/s.SKM Animal Feeds and Foods (India) Limited. The core of the dispute revolved around whether certain transactions constituted a dividend or income under specific sections of the Act, and whether the corporate veil of the company could be lifted in the context of a family arrangement and arbitration award.
What were the issues?
The Tribunal was called upon to decide the following substantial questions of law: 1. Whether the ITAT was correct in holding that the provisions of Sections 2(22)(e), 2(24)(iv), or 56(2)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, could not be invoked in the assessee's case? 2. Whether the ITAT was correct in holding that M/s.SKM Animal Feeds and Foods (India) Limited could be a party to a family arrangement between its family members, given its status as a separate legal entity? 3. Whether the ITAT was correct in holding that the alienation of assets of M/s.SKM Animal Feeds and Foods (India) Limited to one of its directors did not amount to a transfer in pursuance of a family arrangement? 4. Whether the ITAT was correct in holding that the corporate veil of M/s.SKM Animal Feeds and Foods (India) Limited needed to be lifted to view the entire transaction as a family settlement arrived at through an arbitration award? The Revenue contended that the ITAT's findings were erroneous. The judgment does not record specific arguments from the assessee's side regarding these issues, other than their appearance through counsel.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 260A,Section 2(22)(e),Section 2(24)(iv),Section 56(2)(vi)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Judgt. dt. 5.6.2020 in T.C.A.45/2015 CIT v. SKM Shree Shivkumar 1/5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 5.6.2020 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR Tax Case (A) No.45 of 2015 Commissioner of Income Tax Circle I Erode. Appellant Vs. SKM Shree Shivkumar 41, Periyar Nagar, Erode. PAN: AJCPS0629L Respondent Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai, dated 17.7.2014 made in ITA No.1965/Mds/2011. For Appellant : Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent : Mr.M.P.Senthilkumar J U D G M E N T (Delivered by DR.VINEET KOTHARI,J) This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue, calling in question the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai, dated 17.7.2014 made in ITA http://www.judis.nic.in Judgt. dt. 5.6.2020 in T.C.A.45/2015 CIT v. SKM Shree Shivkumar 2/5 No.1965/Mds/2011, for the Assessment Year 2008-2009, by raising the following substantial questions of law: "(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that the provisions of Sections 2(22)(e), 2(24)(iv) or 56(2)(vi) cannot be invoked in the assessee case? (ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that M/s.SKM Animal Feeds and Food (India) Limited could be made as a party to a family arrangement between the family members, when the company is a separate legal entity having a distinct existence, independent of its directors who are the family members? (iii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that alienation of the assets of the private company M/s.SKM Animal Feeds and Foods (India) Limited to one of its directors will not amount to transfer http://www.judis.nic.in Judgt. dt. 5.6.2020 in T.C.A.45/2015 CIT v. SKM Shree Shivkumar 3/5 in pursuant of the family arrangement? (iv) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that corporate veil of the company M/s.SKM Animal Feeds and Foods (India) Limited was required to be lifted to see the entire transaction as family settlement arrived through the arbitration award?" 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Senior Standing Counsel brought to our notice the Circular instruction issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes vide Circular No.17/2019 dated 8th August 2019, wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). 3. In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the Appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed, as withdrawn, keeping open the substantial questions of law for determination in appropriate cases. No costs. (V.K.,J.) (R.S.K.,J.) 5.6.2020 http://www.judis.nic.in Judgt. dt. 5.6.2020 in T.C.A.45/2015 CIT v. SKM Shree Shivkumar 4/5 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ssk. To 1. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle I, Erode. 2. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai. http://www.judis.nic.in Judgt. dt. 5.6.2020 in T.C.A.45/2015 CIT v. SKM Shree Shivkumar 5/5 DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J. and R.SURESH KUMAR, J. ssk. Tax Case (A) No.45 of 2015 5.6.2020. http://www.judis.nic.in
More judgments on Section 2(22)(e)
- Sindhu Farms Pvt Ltd, Gurugram vs DCIT, RohtakITA 8194/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Pranav Prakashchandra Kansara, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward 5 3 2 Ahmedabad, Aayakar Bhavan…ITA 911/AHD/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Pranav Prakashchandra Kansara, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward 5 3 2 Ahmedabad, Aayakar Bhavan…ITA 911/AHD/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- M/S. Jsw Infrastructure Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6051/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- M/S. Jsw Cement Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4867/MUM/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026