PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF IN vs. SUSEE MOTOR FINANCE
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that in light of CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019, which enhances the monetary limits for filing appeals, and the submission by the Revenue that the tax effect under the impugned orders is less than Rs. 1,00,00,000/-, the Tax Case Appeals deserve dismissal. The Court accordingly dismissed the appeals. However, the Court explicitly stated that the substantial questions of law raised in these appeals are left open to be decided in an appropriate proceeding. No costs were awarded.
What were the facts?
The appeals were filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central 2, Chennai (Revenue) against the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'D' Bench. The respondent in all appeals is M/s. Susee Motor Finance. The appeals challenged the Tribunal's orders dated 09.10.2015 in ITA Nos. 2106, 2103, 2107, 2104, 2105, and 2108 of 2014. The Revenue's counsel submitted that the tax effect under the impugned orders was less than Rs. 1,00,00,000/-. Consequently, the Revenue requested that the appeals be dismissed in light of CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019, leaving the substantial questions of law open for future consideration.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the appeals filed by the Revenue should be dismissed on the grounds of low tax effect, as per CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019? (Question of law) Assessee's Contention: The assessee did not make any specific arguments as the Revenue conceded to the dismissal of the appeals based on the circular. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue argued that as the tax effect in the impugned orders is less than Rs. 1,00,00,000/-, CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019 applies, and the appeals should be dismissed. The Revenue also stated that the substantial questions of law raised in these appeals should be left open for consideration in the future.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
TCA.Nos.446, 449, 455, 457, 460 and 464 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 04.06.2020 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. SATHYANARAYANAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE TCA.Nos.446, 449, 455, 457, 460 and 464 of 2019 The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Central 2, No.108, Mahatma Gandhi, Road Chennai 600 034. .. Appellant in all Tax Case Appeals Versus M/s.Susee Motor Finance No.271, [Old No.98/1] Chittoor High Road, Vellore 632 007. PAN AAP FS 9766 G
.. Respondent in all Tax Case Appeals 1/6 http://www.judis.nic.in TCA.Nos.446, 449, 455, 457, 460 and 464 of 2019 Prayer:- Tax Case Appeals filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras ''D'' Bench dated 09.10.2015 in ITA.Nos.2106/Mds/2014 ; 2103/Mds/2014 ; 2107/Mds/2014 ; 2104/Mds/2014 ; 2105/Mds/2014 ; and 2108/2014. For Appellant in all cases : Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar For Respondent in all cases : Mr.T.Vasudevan COMMON JUDGMENT [Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.SATHYANARAYANAN,J.,] (1)Heard Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar, learned Standing counsel appearing for the appellant/Revenue and Mr.T.Vasudvan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent/assessee in the above Tax Case Appeals. (2)The learned Standing counsel appearing for the appellant/Revenue fairly submitted that since the tax effect under the impugned orders is less than Rs.1,00,00,000/-, the Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes shall apply and the appeals may be dismissed, leaving the substantial questions of law raised in these appeals open for consideration in the near future. (3)Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 reads as follows:- 2/6 http://www.judis.nic.in TCA.Nos.446, 449, 455, 457, 460 and 464 of 2019 ''Circular No.3/2018 dated 11th July 2018 has been replaced by Circular No.17/2019 dated 8th August 2019 to enhance Monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal High Courts and SLPs/Appeals before Supreme Court for reducing litigation. Appeals/SLPs in Income Tax Matters Monetary Limit [Rs.] [Previous Limits] Monetary Limit [Rs.] [Revised Limit] Before Appellate Tribunal 20,00,000 50,00,000 Before High Court 50,00,000 1,00,00,000 Before Supreme Court 1,00,00,000 2,00,00,000 ●The Assessing Officer shall calculate the tax effect separately for every assessment year in respect of the disputed issues in the case of every assessee. If, in the case of an assessee, the disputed issues arise in more than one assessment year, appeal can be filed in respect of such assessment year or years in which the tax effect in respect of the disputed issues exceeds the monetary limit. No appeal shall be filed in respect of an assessment year or years in which the tax effect is less than 3/6 http://www.judis.nic.in TCA.Nos.446, 449, 455, 457, 460 and 464 of 2019 the monetary limit. ●Further, even in the case of composite order of High Court or appellate authority which involves more than one assessment year and common issues in more than one assessment year, no appeal shall be filed in respect of an assessment year or years in which the tax effect is less than the monetary limit. ●In case where a composite order/judgment involves more than one assessee, each assessee shall be dealt with separately. (4)In the light of the above referred circular, these Tax Case Appeals deserve dismissal and accordingly, dismissed. However, the question of law is left open and it is to be decided in an appropriate proceeding. No costs. [M.S.N.,J] [A.Q., J] 04.06.2020 AP Internet : Yes 4/6 http://www.judis.nic.in TCA.Nos.446, 449, 455, 457, 460 and 464 of 2019 To The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Central 2, No.108, Mahatma Gandhi, Road Chennai 600 034. 5/6 http://www.judis.nic.in TCA.Nos.446, 449, 455, 457, 460 and 464 of 2019 M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J., AND ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J., AP TCA.Nos.446, 449, 455, 457, 460 & 464/2019 04.06.2020 6/6 http://www.judis.nic.in
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026