COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SIMPSON & GENERAL

TCA.Nos.359-365/2016 In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 30.8.2019 Coram : The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM and The Honourable Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN Tax Case Appeal Nos.359 to 365 of 2016 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai ...Appellant Vs M/s.Simpson & General Finance Co. Ltd., Chennai-2. ...Respondent APPEALS under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the common order dated 18.3.2015 made in ITA.Nos.2655 to 2661/Mds/2014 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'A' Bench respectively for the assessment years from 2002-03 to 2008-09. For Appellant: Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar, SSC assisted by Ms.K.G.Usharani, SC For Respondent: Mr.R.Venkatanarayanan for M/s.Subbaraya Aiyer Padmanabhan COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment was delivered by

T.S.Sivagnanam,J)

We have heard Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel assisted by Ms.K.G.Usharani, Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant – 1/4 http://www.judis.nic.in TCA.Nos.359-365/2016 Revenue and Mr.R.Venkatanarayanan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent – assessee. 2. These appeals, filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, are directed against the common order dated 18.3.2015 made in ITA.Nos.2655 to 2661/Mds/2014 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'A' Bench respectively for the assessment years from 2002-03 to 2008-09. 3. The appeals were admitted on 12.7.2016 on the following substantial question of law : “Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) is not sustainable?” 4. The learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant submits that the above appeals are not pursued by the Revenue on account of the low tax effect in terms of Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.8.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. By the said Circular, the monetary limit for filing or pursuing an appeal before the High Court has been increased to Rs.1 Crore. It is further submitted that the tax effect in the respective cases is less than the threshold limit. 2/4 http://www.judis.nic.in TCA.Nos.359-365/2016 5. In the light of the said submissions, the above tax case appeals are dismissed on account of the low tax effect. The substantial question of law framed is left open. In the event the tax effect in the respective cases is above the threshold limit fixed in the said circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court to restore the appeals to be heard and decided on merits. No costs. (T.S.S.J.) (V.B.S.J.)

30.8.2019 Speaking (or) Non Speaking Order Index : Yes (or) No Internet: Yes (or) No To The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'A' Bench. RS 3/4 http://www.judis.nic.in TCA.Nos.359-365/2016 T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J AND V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN,J RS TCA.Nos.359 to 365 of 2016 30.8.2019 4/4 http://www.judis.nic.in