THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME T vs. M/S.BESSER CONCRETE SYSTEMS
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn on account of low tax effect, as per the submissions made by the Revenue citing CBDT Circular No. 17/2019. The Court noted that the monetary limit for filing or pursuing an appeal before the High Court had been increased to Rs. 1 crore and that the tax effect in this case was less than the threshold. The substantial questions of law framed were left open. Liberty was granted to the Revenue to seek restoration of the appeal if the tax effect was found to be above the threshold limit, to be heard and decided on merits. No costs were awarded.
What were the facts?
The Revenue, Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Madras, dated February 20, 2014. The appeal pertained to Assessment Year 2000-2001 and challenged the ITAT's deletion of an addition of Rs. 7,46,46,043/- to the book profit. The assessee is M/s. Besser Concrete Systems Ltd. The appeal was admitted on substantial questions of law. Subsequently, the Revenue sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
1. Whether, on the facts and circumstances, the Tribunal was correct in deleting the addition of Rs. 7,46,46,043/- to the book profit, considering Section 115JA(b) which mandates adding back amounts credited to any reserve, by whatever name called, to the book profit? 2. Is the Tribunal's finding incorrect, given that Section 41(1) addresses remission of liability as income, and its import cannot be disregarded when computing book profit under Section 115JA? Assessee's Contentions: Not recorded. Revenue's Contentions: The Revenue submitted that the appeal was not being pursued due to low tax effect, citing CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 which increased the monetary limit for appeals to the High Court to Rs. 1 crore. The tax effect in this case was stated to be below this threshold.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
T.C.A.No.1157 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 26.03.2021 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI T.C.A.No.1157 of 2015 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai ... Appellant v. M/s. Besser Concerte Systems Ltd., C/o. Shri S.Sridhar, Advocate, New No.14, Flat No.5, 1st Avenue, Indira Nagar, Adyar, Chennai – 600 020. ... Respondent Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras, “A” Bench, dated 20.02.2014 in ITA.No.458/Mds/2007 for the Assessment Year 2000-2001. For Appellant : Mrs. R.Hemalatha, Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent : Mr. M. Kaushik for Mr. S. Sridhar Page 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.1157 of 2015 JUDGMENT (Judgment was delivered by M. DURAISWAMY, J.) We have heard Mrs. R.Hemalatha, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant/Revenue and Mr.M. Kaushik for the respondent/Assessee. 2.The appeal, filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, the Act) is directed against the order dated 20.02.2014 made in ITA.No.458/Mds/2007 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, ''A'' Bench (for brevity, the Tribunal) for the Assessment Year 2000-2001. 3.The appeal was admitted on the following substantial questions of law: “(i) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in deleting the addition of Rs.7,46,46,043/- made to book profit especially when clause (b) section 115JA provides that the amount credited to any reserve by whatever Page 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.1157 of 2015 name called shall be added back to the book profit? (ii) Is not the finding of the Tribunal bad especially when section 41(1) speaks about any remission of liability should be in the nature of income and import of section 41(1) cannot be ignored while computing book profit under section 115JA?” 4.The learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the above appeal is not pursued by the Revenue on account of the Low Tax Effect in terms of Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. By the said Circular, the monetary limit for filing or pursuing an appeal before the High Court has been increased to Rs.1 crore. It is further submitted that the tax effect in this case is less than the threshold limit. 5.In the light of the said submissions, the above Tax Case Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn on account of the Low Tax Effect. The substantial question of law framed is left open. In the event the tax effect in this case is above the threshold limit fixed in the said Circular, Page 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.1157 of 2015 liberty is granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court to restore the appeal to be heard and decided on merits. No costs. [M.D., J.] [T.V.T.S., J.] 26.03.2021
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes Rj To The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, ''A'' Bench Page 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.1157 of 2015 M. DURAISWAMY, J. and T.V. THAMILSELVI, J. Rj T.C.A.No.1157 of 2015 26.03.2021 Page 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
More judgments on Section 115JA
- DCIT., Circle-1(1), Hyderabad vs M/S. Aragen Life Sciences Limited, HyderabadITA 639/HYD/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed25 Jul 2025AY 2015-16
- Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Ltd… vs The Dy.CIT., Circle-1(1), BarodaITA 1246/AHD/2012[2003-04]Status: Disposed19 Jun 2025AY 2003-04
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1), Hyderabad vs Regency Ceramics Limited, HyderabadITA 1350/HYD/2024[1998-99]Status: Disposed2 Jun 2025AY 1998-99
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1), Hyderabad vs Regency Ceramics Limited, HyderabadITA 1340/HYD/2024[2002-2003]Status: Disposed2 Jun 2025AY 2002-2003
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-3 (1), Hyderabad vs Regency Ceramics Limited, HyderabadITA 1339/HYD/2024[2001-2002]Status: Disposed2 Jun 2025AY 2001-2002
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026