M/S VIRGO PROPERTIES P LTD., vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

PDF · subscribers
TCA/103/2018HC Madras07 January 2021Bench: Hon`ble Mr Justice T. S. SIVAGNANAM4 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court noted that the assessee had filed a declaration/undertaking under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, and orders were passed on 31.12.2020 in Form No.3. In light of this subsequent event, the Court granted the assessee liberty to restore the appeal if the ultimate decision on the declaration filed under the Scheme was not in their favour. If such a prayer for restoration was made, the Registry was directed to entertain it without insisting on a condonation of delay application and place it before the appropriate Division Bench. Consequently, the substantial questions of law raised in the appeal were left open and not decided on merits. No costs were awarded.

What were the facts?

The assessee, M/s.Virgo Properties P. Ltd., filed an appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Madras challenging an order dated 31.7.2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai ('the Tribunal'). The appeal pertains to the assessment year 2012-13. The assessee is aggrieved by the Tribunal's interpretation of Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning the inclusion of capital gains/profits in the computation of book profits for taxation. The appeal was filed under Section 260A of the Act. The Revenue was represented by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle 3(2), Chennai.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the interpretation of Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is correct in including capital gains/profits in the quantification of book profits for taxation? (Question of law) 2. Whether the interpretation of Section 115JB of the Act, to exclude capital gains profit from book profit computation, as held by various courts including the High Court, was validly and correctly followed by the Appellate Tribunal, despite the appellant citing subsequent decisions? Assessee's contentions: The assessee argued that the Tribunal's interpretation of Section 115JB was incorrect regarding the inclusion of capital gains/profits in book profits. The assessee also contended that the Tribunal failed to follow various High Court decisions, including those rendered subsequent to the impugned order, which supported the exclusion of capital gains from book profit computation. Revenue's contentions: The judgment does not record any specific contentions made by the Revenue.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 115JB,Section 260A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

TCA.No.103 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 07.1.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA Tax Case Appeal No.103 of 2018

M/s.Virgo Properties P. Ltd., Chennai-17 ...Appellant Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle 3(2), Chennai-34 ...Respondent APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 31.7.2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench, Chennai made in I.T.A.No.741/Mds/2016 for the assessment year 2012-13. For Appellant: Mr.A.S.Sriraman For Respondent: Ms.V.Pushpa, JSC Judgment was delivered by

T.S.SIVAGNANAM

This appeal has been filed by the assessee under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for brevity) challenging the order 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.No.103 of 2018 dated 31.7.2017 made in I.T.A.No.741/Mds/2016 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, 'B' Bench ('the Tribunal' for brevity) for the assessment year 2012-13. 2. The assessee has filed this appeal by raising the following substantial questions of law : “i. Whether the interpretation of the provisions of Section 115JB of the Act is correct in so far as the inclusion of capital gains/profits in the quantification of book profits for taxation ? And ii. Whether the interpretation of Section 115JB of the Act so as to exclude the capital gains profit from the book profit computation given by various courts including this Court is validly and correctly followed by the Appellate Tribunal despite the decisions rendered/cited by the appellant were subsequent to the decision followed in the impugned order?” 3. We have heard Mr.A.S.Sriraman, learned counsel for the appellant/assessee and Ms.V.Pushpa, learned Junior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent/Revenue. 4. The learned counsel for the assessee submits that the assessee already filed the declaration/undertaking under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and orders were passed on 31.12.2020 in Form No.3. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.No.103 of 2018 5. In the light of the subsequent event, the assessee is given liberty to restore this appeal in the event the ultimate decision taken on the declaration filed by the assessee under Section 4 of the said Act is not in favour of the assessee. If such a prayer is made, the Registry shall entertain the prayer without insisting upon any application to be filed for condonation of delay in restoration of the appeal and on such request made by the assessee by filing a miscellaneous petition for restoration, the Registry shall place such petition before the appropriate Division Bench for orders. 6. The tax case appeal stands disposed of with the aforementioned liberty. Consequently, the substantial questions of law raised are left open. No costs. 07.1.2021 To 1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle 3(2), Chennai-34 RS 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.No.103 of 2018 T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J AND R.N.MANJULA,J RS TCA.No.103 of 2018 07.1.2021 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

More judgments on Section 115JB

All 5,494 judgments and leading authorities on Section 115JB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →