DOOR DEVICES MANUFACTURING COMPANY vs. PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI & ANR.

PDF · subscribers
W.P.(C)/12103/2022HC DelhiDLHC01031120202214 May 2026Author: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The Delhi High Court did not decide any substantive issues in this excerpt. The court merely adjourned the hearing of the three writ petitions to a future date, May 14, 2026, as requested by the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent. The reason for the adjournment is not specified. No findings were made on any of the merits of the cases, and no operative directions were issued beyond scheduling the next hearing.

What were the facts?

These are three writ petitions filed before the Delhi High Court. The petitioners are Deepak Hinges Private Ltd., Door Devices Manufacturing Company, and D.D. Hardware Private Limited. They are challenging orders or actions taken by the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax and another respondent. The specific assessment years and the nature of the orders under challenge are not detailed in this excerpt. The procedural history indicates that these matters were listed for hearing, and a request was made by the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent to adjourn the hearing. The court acceded to this request.

What were the issues?

The provided text does not contain any specific legal issues that the Tribunal had to decide, nor does it record any arguments made by the assessee or the revenue. The excerpt is limited to procedural matters regarding the listing of the cases and an adjournment request. Therefore, no questions of law or fact can be identified, and no contentions of either party are recorded.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (2 matters)

W.P.(C) 12059/2022
W.P.(C) 12103/2022

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~11 to 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12059/2022 CM APPL. 38918/2023 DEEPAK HINGES PRIVATE LTD .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given versus PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, SSC. Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Sr. Adv, with Ms Pankhuri Shrivastava, Mr. Alekshendra Sharma and Mr. Mukul, Advs. 12 + W.P.(C) 12103/2022 CM APPL. 38919/2023 DOOR DEVICES MANUFACTURING COMPANY .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given versus PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Sr. Adv, with Ms Pankhuri Shrivastava, Mr. Alekshendra Sharma and Mr. Mukul, Advs. Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC, Mr. V. K. Saksena and Ms Hemlata Rawat, JSCs. 13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/06/2026 at 00:42:44

+ W.P.(C) 12109/2022 CM APPL. 38917/2023 D.D. HARDWARE PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given versus PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Sr. Adv, with Ms Pankhuri Shrivastava, Mr. Alekshendra Sharma and Mr. Mukul, Advs. Mr. Indruj Singh Rai, SSC, Mr. Sanjeev Menon, Mr. Rahul Singh, JSCs and Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN O R D E R %

15.04.

2026

1.

This case is taken up today as 14.04.2026 was declared a holiday on account of the birth anniversary of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar as informed vide circular No. No. 71/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 10.04.2026. 2. List these cases on 14.05.2026 as prayed by Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, learned Senior Standing Counsel. DINESH MEHTA, J MADHU JAIN, J APRIL 15, 2026/ss This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/06/2026 at 00:42:44

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →