KOYYODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court of Kerala, in light of its previous judgment in W.P.(C) No.28170/2019 (Ext.P8), held that all recovery proceedings pursuant to the impugned orders in the appeals before the third respondent (Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)) shall be kept in abeyance till the appeals are disposed of. The court did not delve into the merits of the disputed amount or the validity of the assessment itself. The reasoning is based on the precedent established in the earlier writ petition, which addressed the issue of keeping recovery proceedings in abeyance pending appeal. The operative direction is to keep recovery proceedings in abeyance. No issue was expressly left undecided.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, M/s. Koyyode Service Co-operative Bank, is a Primary Agricultural Credit Society. They are aggrieved by Ext.P7 order issued by the second respondent, the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax. This order directed the petitioner to pay 20% of the disputed amount. The petitioner had approached the High Court of Kerala by way of a writ petition. A similar issue concerning recovery proceedings pending appeal had been considered by the same court in W.P.(C) No.28170/2019, dated 23.10.2019, which was produced as Ext.P8. The present writ petition challenges the order demanding 20% of the disputed amount.
What were the issues?
1. Whether recovery proceedings pursuant to impugned orders in appeals before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) should be kept in abeyance until the appeals are disposed of? (Question of law and fact, turning on principles of natural justice and the Income Tax Act, 1961). Assessee's Contention: The petitioner, aggrieved by the order demanding 20% of the disputed amount, sought relief from the High Court. They relied on a previous judgment of the same court in W.P.(C) No.28170/2019 (Ext.P8) which dealt with a similar issue. Revenue's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific contentions made by the revenue in this particular writ petition. However, the impugned order was passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, demanding 20% of the disputed amount.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE SATURDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 25TH KARTHIKA, 1941 WP(C).No.31007 OF 2019(A) PETITIONER/S: M/S.KOYYODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, KOYYODE P.O., KANNUR-670621, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SHISNA T.C. BY ADVS. SRI.S.ARUN RAJ SRI. PAUL JOHN RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, KANNUR RANGE, KANNUR- 670006. 2 THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, NORTH BLOCK, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE- 673001. 3 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE-673001. BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.11.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.31007/2019(A) 2 JUDGMENT Dated this the 16th day of November 2019 The petitioner is a Primary Agricultural Credit Society. Aggrieved by Ext.P7 order of the second respondent, they approached this Court. By the said order, the petitioner was directed to pay 20% of the disputed amount demanded by the second respondent. A similar issue was considered by this Court in W.P.(C) No.28170/2019 dated 23.10.2019, produced as Ext.P8. In the light of Ext.P8 judgment, all recovery proceedings pursuant to the impugned orders in the appeals before the third respondent shall be kept in abeyance till the appeals are disposed of. The writ petition is disposed of as above. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE ln
WP(C).No.31007/2019(A) 3
Appendix — schedule of exhibits
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026