ARAYOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK NO 692, vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER
What did the High Court hold?
The Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. The judgment states that the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, it grants the petitioner liberty to assail the order (presumably the rectification order) if they choose to do so in the future. No specific findings were made on the merits of any issue, as the petition was withdrawn. The Court did not decide any substantive legal question.
What were the facts?
The petitioners, Arayoor Service Co-operative Bank and its Managing Committee, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala. The respondents were the Income Tax Officer and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The third respondent was the Branch Manager of the Trivandrum District Co-operative Bank. The writ petition was filed challenging an order or action by the revenue. During the proceedings, the learned counsel for the respondents produced an order passed on rectification proceedings. The petitioner's counsel stated that this order had not been received by the client but sought permission to withdraw the writ petition.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the petitioner has grounds to challenge the order passed on rectification proceedings, given that it has not yet been received by the client? The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The revenue's contentions are not recorded in the judgment. The petitioner's counsel indicated that the rectification order was not received by the client but sought to withdraw the petition.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Today when the matter is taken up, learned Counsel for the 1st and 2nd respondents produced the order passed on rectification proceedings. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that aforementioned order is not received by the client. However, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to assail the order. AMIT RAWAL JUDGE Jm/
WP(C).No.3721 OF 2020(M) 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 AOF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 20.11.2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2 AOF THE APPEAL DATED 10.1.2018 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3 AOF THE ORDER DATED 18.12.2018 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT IN APPEAL EXHIBIT P4 AOF THE ORDER DATED 1.1.2019 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P5 AOF THE NOTICE DATED 5.2.2020 ISSUED UNDER SEC 226(3)
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Basant Kumar Gupta vs. Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S Swapnashiyana Homes Developers Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- Shree Hanumant Steel Traders vs. Assistant CommissionerChhattisgarh · 1 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026