HIMMATARAM SAGRAMAJI CHOUDHARY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(3) PANAJI AND 3 ORS

PDF · subscribers
WP/187/2026HC BombayHCBM05000380202606 July 2026Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VALMIKI MENEZES,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR1 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

33-WP-187-2026.DOC Suchitra IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO.187/2026 HIMMATRAM SAGRAMJI CHOUDHARY … PETITIONER Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(3) PANAJI AND 3 ORS. … RESPONDENTS Mr Sahil Sardessai, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Respondent Dept. CORAM: VALMIKI MENEZES & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATED: 6th JULY 2026 P.C. : 1. he Revenue has dropped the assessment proceedings against the Petitioner vide communication dated 18.02.2026. In view of this communication, the grievance raised in the Petition has been redressed. Mr Sahil Sardessai, learned counsel for the Petitioner on instructions, and in view of this development, seeks to withdraw this Petition. 2. he Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. VALMIKI MENEZES, J. Page 1 of 1 6th July 2026 Signed by: SUCHITRA NANDAN SINGBAL Designation: Personal Assistant Date: 07/07/2026 10:07:04

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →