DEVENDRA CHANDANMAL JAIN vs. ASSISTANT/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, NASHIK
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court granted the petitioner's request to withdraw the petitions. The Court observed that Mr. Naniwadekar, representing the petitioner, sought leave to withdraw the petitions. Consequently, the Court ordered that the petitions be dismissed as withdrawn. No decision was made on the merits of the case, as the petitions were withdrawn by the petitioner. The specific reasons for withdrawal were not elaborated upon in the order. The operative direction was the dismissal of the petitions.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Devendra Chandanmal Jain, filed three writ petitions (Nos. 15616, 15617, and 15618 of 2023) before the Bombay High Court. The respondents were the Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 2, and another. The petitions challenged an order or action by the revenue authorities. The specific assessment years and the amount in dispute were not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to these petitions was not detailed.
What were the issues?
The primary issue before the High Court was whether the petitioner should be granted leave to withdraw the writ petitions. Assessee's contention: Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar, on behalf of the petitioner, sought leave to withdraw the petitions. Revenue's contention: Mr. Ajeet Manwani, along with Ms. Samiksha Kanani, appeared for the respondents – Revenue. The judgment does not record any specific contention or argument from the revenue's side regarding the withdrawal, other than their appearance.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1/1 443.WP-15616-2023.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.15616 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.15617 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.15618 OF 2023 Devendra Chandanmal Jain ….Petitioner V/s. The Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 2 and Anr. ....Respondents ---- Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar i/b. Mr. Smit Shah for petitioner. Mr. Ajeet Manwani a/w. Ms. Samiksha Kanani for respondents – Revenue. ---- CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM & DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
DATED : 23rd JANUARY 2024 P.C. : WRIT PETITION NO.15616 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.15617 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.15618 OF 2023 1 Mr. Naniwadekar seeks leave to withdraw the petitions. 2 Petitions dismissed as withdrawn. (DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.) Gauri Gaekwad GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Digitally signed by GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Date: 2024.01.24 10:57:59 +0530
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026