AMBALAPAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2 (1)
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court, considering the limited nature of the relief sought, disposed of the writ petition. It directed the 2nd respondent (Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)) to decide the appeal (Ext.P5) in accordance with law within three months of receiving a copy of the judgment, after providing the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. Crucially, the Court ordered that the demand for remittance of 20% of the tax (Ext.P8) shall be kept in abeyance until the appeal is decided. Furthermore, recovery proceedings based on the assessment order (Ext.P3) were deferred until such time. The principle derived is that pending appeal, the demand for pre-deposit can be stayed if the appellate authority is directed to decide the appeal expeditiously.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Ambalapad Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., is a primary agricultural credit society. It filed an appeal (Ext.P5) against an assessment order (Ext.P3). The petitioner's grievance is that the Income Tax Officer is insisting on the payment of 20% of the assessed tax pending the appeal's consideration. The petitioner has approached the High Court of Kerala by way of a writ petition (civil) seeking relief regarding this insistence.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the insistence on payment of 20% of the assessed tax pending appeal is legally tenable, considering the pendency of the appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)? (Question of law) The assessee (petitioner) contended that the insistence on payment of 20% of the assessed tax pending appeal is causing hardship and that the appeal itself should be considered expeditiously. The revenue (respondent) was represented by learned standing counsel, and their specific arguments are not recorded in the judgment.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
DATED 03.12.2019 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-2013. EXHIBIT P4 AOF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 03.12.2019. EXHIBIT P5 AOF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P6 AOF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 10.01.2020. EXHIBIT P7 AOF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.7.2019 IN W.A. NO. 1639 OF 2019. EXHIBIT P8 AOF THE ORDER NO. ITBA/COM/F/17/2019-20/1025776373(1) DATED 26.02.2020.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026