THE VENKITANGU FARMER'S CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. R 187 vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the first respondent, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), to decide the appeal (Ext.P3) within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. This decision is to be made in accordance with the law and after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. Crucially, the Court directed that the decision should be taken without insisting on the payment of 20% of the tax demanded, as per a circular from 2017. Furthermore, the Court ordered that recovery proceedings pursuant to the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance until such time as a decision is taken on the appeal. The ratio decidendi is that appellate authorities should dispose of appeals expeditiously, and interim relief regarding recovery can be granted pending appeal disposal, especially when supported by circulars.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, The Venkitangu Farmer's Co-operative Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala seeking a direction for the disposal of its appeal (Ext.P3) pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (the first respondent). This appeal was filed against an assessment order (Ext.P1) passed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward 2, Guruvayoor (the second respondent). The petitioner sought a timely decision on their appeal.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the High Court should direct the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to dispose of the pending appeal of the petitioner? 2. Whether the recovery proceedings should be kept in abeyance until a decision is taken on the appeal? Assessee's Contention: The petitioner bank sought a direction from the High Court for the expeditious disposal of its appeal before the first respondent. The petitioner also sought a stay on recovery proceedings until the appeal is decided. Revenue's Contention: The judgment records no specific contentions from the revenue side regarding the disposal of the appeal or the stay of recovery proceedings.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before the first respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against the assessment order Ext.P1. 2. Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting on payment of 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017. Till such time a decision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedings pursuant to the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance. AMIT RAWAL sab JUDGE
WP(C).No.8169 OF 2020(U) 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER ALONG WITH COMPUTATION SHEET DATED 13.11.2019. EXHIBIT P2OF DEMAND NOTICE DATED 13.11.2019. EXHIBIT P3OF THE APPEAL DATED 9.12.2019. EXHIBIT P4OF THE ORDER DATED 17.1.2020. EXHIBIT P5OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 24.1.2020. EXHIBIT P6OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 1.7.2019 IN W.A.1536 OF 2019.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026