THE PULLAMPARA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.2429 vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

PDF · subscribers
WP(C)/5074/2020HC KeralaKLHC01013944202024 February 2020Author: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court directed the appellate authority (the second respondent) to dispose of the appeal within a period of two months after issuing notice to the petitioner. The Court further ordered that recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance until the disposal of the appeal. The judgment does not explicitly address the legality of the 20% demand for stay, but implicitly grants relief by staying recovery pending appeal disposal. The issue of the specific condition for stay was not decided on merits, but the appeal was ordered to be disposed of expeditiously.

What were the facts?

The petitioner, The Pullampara Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., a co-operative society, filed an appeal against an assessment order under the Income Tax Act before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), the second respondent. The assessing authority demanded payment of 20% of the disputed tax as a condition for granting a stay against recovery pending the appeal. The petitioner challenged this demand and sought a stay of recovery proceedings. The writ petition was filed before the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the appellate authority is justified in demanding 20% of the disputed tax for granting a stay against recovery pending appeal, considering the petitioner is a co-operative society? The petitioner contended that the demand for 20% of the disputed tax for a stay was onerous and sought a direction for the disposal of the appeal without such pre-condition or with a modified condition. The revenue's contentions are not recorded in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 5TH PHALGUNA, 1941 WP(C).No.5074 OF 2020(H) PETITIONER: THE PULLAMPARA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.2429 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,MUKKUDIL P.O, VENJARAMOODU, THIRUVNANTHAPURAM DISTRICT 695 607 BY ADVS. SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR SRI.ARJUN RAGHAVAN RESPONDENTS: 1 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -2(3), OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KAWDIAR P.O, THIRUVNANATHAPURAM PIN 695 003 2 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) SSYSKST BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695 003 CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.5074 OF 2020(H) 2 JUDGMENT Dated this the 24th day of February 2020 The petitioner, a co-operative society filed an appeal as against the assessment order under the Income Tax Act before the 2nd respondent. The assessing authority insisted payment of 20% of the disputed tax to grant stay against recovery, pending appeal. In the light of the various judgments of this Court, the appellate authority - 2nd respondent is directed to dispose the appeal within a period of two months after issuing notice to the petitioner. Till then, the recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. Ordered accordingly. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE SAS/24/02/2020 JUDGE WP(C).No.5074 OF 2020(H) 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2017-2018 DATED 13-12-2019 EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT DATED 13- 12-2019 EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE ONLINE APPEAL DATED 06- 01-2020 ALONG WITH GROUNDS OF APPEAL, FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT, AGAINST EXT P1

ASSESSMENT ORDER. EXHIBIT P4 AOF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN EXT P3 APPEAL DATED 21- 01-2020 EXHIBIT P5 AOF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19-07- 2019 IN W.A NO. 1639 OF 2019 EXHIBIT P6 AOF THE JUDGMENT DATED 25-11- 2019 IN WP(C) NO. 31787 OF 2019 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL //// P.A. TO JUDGE

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →