ARUN RAJ PILLAI., vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed the writ petitions as withdrawn. The petitioners, having already filed statutory appeals against the assessment orders, sought to withdraw their writ petitions. They requested liberty to pursue all their pleas and submissions before the appellate authority, which was granted. The court also directed that if an application for interim stay is pressed before the appellate authority, it should be decided expeditiously, within 15 days of receiving a certified copy of the order. The court did not decide on the merits of the assessment orders or the grounds raised by the petitioners.
What were the facts?
The petitioners, Varun Raj, M.K. Rajendran Pillai, Arun Raj Pillai, and Valsala Raj, filed four separate writ petitions before the High Court of Kerala challenging assessment orders passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax. The petitions were filed in February 2020, after appeals against these assessment orders had already been preferred in January 2020. The petitioners raised several grounds, including violation of natural justice and resort to provisions of Section 153(d) of the Income Tax Act. The revenue was represented by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), and the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the writ petitions are maintainable when statutory appeals against the assessment orders have already been filed by the petitioners? Assessee's Contention: The learned counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to raise all pleas and submissions, including those raised in Ext.P7 and in the grounds of appeal pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax. Revenue's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific contention from the revenue regarding the maintainability of the writ petitions. However, the court's decision implies that the alternative remedy of appeal was available and pursued.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
153(d)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (4 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT [ WP(C).3377/2020, WP(C).3390/2020, WP(C).3423/2020, WP(C).3438/2020 ] Dated this the 2nd day of March 2020 Petitioners have raised many pleas for challenging the assessment orders including the violation of natural justice as well as resort to certain provisions of Section 153(d) of the Income Tax Act. Concededly against the order of assessment, appeals have been preferred in the month of January 2020. Despite that, challenged the same very orders through this instant petition in February 2020. Having confronted with the maintainability of the writ petition, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks the leave of this court for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to take up all the pleas and submissions raised in Ext.P7, over and above what has been stated in the grounds of appeal pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax. The liberty aforementioned is fair and honest
WP(C).Nos.3377,3390,3423 & 3438 OF 2020 6
accordingly accorded.
As far as the interim prayer is concerned, petitioners can always press the application for interim stay. In case such application is pressed, the concerned appellate authority shall decide as expeditiously as possible, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order. The writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. AMIT RAWAL JUDGE uu 02.03.2020
WP(C).Nos.3377,3390,3423 & 3438 OF 2020 7
Appendix — schedule of exhibits
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026
- Mrs. Aqsa Begum vs. Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026