DINESH KUMAR KHATORIA S/O LATE SHRI DAMODAR LAL KHATORIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted that the learned counsel for the petitioner, after receiving instructions from the client, stated that the instant civil writ petition was not being pressed. The court allowed the petitioner to raise all objections before the concerned authority. Consequently, the civil writ petition was disposed of as not pressed, with liberty granted to the petitioner as prayed for. The court directed that the authority concerned shall deal with all objections in accordance with law. No specific finding was given on the validity of the Section 153C order as the petition was not pressed.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar Khatoria, filed a civil writ petition before the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur. The petition challenged an order issued under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The respondent was the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 4, Jaipur. The petitioner's counsel, upon receiving instructions from the client, informed the court that the petition was not being pressed.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the order issued under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is valid and legally sustainable? (Question of law) Assessee's contention: The petitioner did not press the civil writ petition. Revenue's contention: Not recorded in the judgment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
[2025:RJ-JP:41621-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12572/2025 Dinesh Kumar Khatoria S/o Late Shri Damodar Lal Khatoria, Aged About 65 Years, R/o 626, Balaji Ka Rasta, Ghat Gate Bazar, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus The Assistant Commisioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 4 Jaipur. Address Room No. 416, 4Th Floor Jeevan Nidhi II, Bhawani Singh Road, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Meenakshi Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sarvesh Jain with Ms. Tanushka Sxena for Mr. Siddharth Bapna HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 13/10/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner challenging the order issued under Section 153C of Income Tax Act, 1961. Learned counsel for the petitioner at outset of instruction from the client and is not pressing the instant civil writ petition with liberty to raise all the objections before the authority concerned. Accordingly, the instant civil writ petition stands disposed of as not press with liberty as prayed for. There is no doubt authority concerned shall deal with all the objections in accordance with law. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J ashu /21
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mrs. Aqsa Begum vs. Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026